211
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« on: June 04, 2020, 07:29:13 pm »
As usual dirty tactics utilized to force through trash policies.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
212
General Discussion / Re: Proposal on bitASSETS dividend and BTS destruction
« on: June 04, 2020, 07:28:39 pm »
more bitasset scams being forced through? sad.
213
General Discussion / Re: Prediction Market: June 2020 BTS 0.30 CNY
« on: June 02, 2020, 08:07:32 pm »
How can we trust a prediction market asset from a proponent of faking price feeds? Exceedingly unwise to participate in this.
214
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« on: May 26, 2020, 07:45:45 pm »
Reject.
215
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP2: Reform on bitEUR feed price mechanism
« on: May 24, 2020, 05:04:20 pm »lower USD threshold
Remove the threshold, provide real price feeds. 2 instances of months long bailouts to the detriment of BTS, bad debtors need to face reality.
216
General Discussion / Re: BTS-DEX economic model(updated MM contest rule)
« on: May 24, 2020, 05:02:30 pm »Quote
bitAssets include bitCNY， bitUSD
Why include known scam coins in this? Reject.
217
General Discussion / Re: how about slowly lowering the bitUSD and bitCNY feed price threshold?
« on: May 17, 2020, 11:36:47 pm »
Give 24hrs notice then publish the real price. The bitassets have not had their peg for almost a year, as is they are dead scam coins with zero future.
218
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Marketing: Full time Marketing team
« on: April 30, 2020, 09:08:19 pm »
Reject.
219
General Discussion / Re: Info about scamcoins?
« on: April 30, 2020, 09:06:43 pm »
List of known scamcoins: bitUSD, bitCNY
220
General Discussion / Re: Does it make sense to cultivate bitEUR?
« on: April 25, 2020, 11:17:37 am »
Just another dead scamcoin, RIP
221
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP2: Reform on bitEUR feed price mechanism
« on: April 17, 2020, 01:03:55 pm »
BAIP 2 was proven a failure due to BSIP76 twice intervening. SCAM
222
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: April 04, 2020, 04:11:22 pm »interesting, why shall I trust you, not my eyes?https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/us/politics/cia-coronavirus-china.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/china-concealed-extent-of-virus-outbreak-u-s-intelligence-says
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-52321529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CC6ChW-CQg
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/no-10-drops-china-from-coronavirus-death-toll-list-dxfr92fdk
They hit their threshold and set a fixed feed like bitCNY 🤔
we just updated the design of bitCNY, in old times bitCNY is a derivative that base on BTS real time price. now it is a derivative that base on one function of BTS priceWithout providing bitasset holders a vote, without changing the asset details nor website's technical documentation to reflect these changes. A cover up.
Why not instead buy more BTS to cover bad debt positions than defraud bitasset holders?
surely this change hurt bitCNY holders, but it solve the death spiral and benefit BTS future. the decision is made mainly by China community, include most of the bitCNY holders.No doubt it hurt bitasset holders, 70%+ loss of asset value is a substantial second bailout of bad debtors without their permission. bitCNY is no longer a stable store of value for savers nor retail, new smartcoins are being created with substantially higher credibility than bitassets.
Death spiral is subjective, the spiral has already occurred for the asset holder not the bad debtor; global settlement at real prices would have provided an opportunity for traders, denying this core trading activity disincentivizes buying BTS at these high prices.
223
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:27:25 pm »In August 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to remove the dollar peg to gold, the Bretton Woods System collapsed.BS. Global settlement would have nullified this bad debt issue & we'd likely have recovered by this point.
You surely can say that US cheated the whole world, but the point is, at that moment US has no other choice.
BTS also face similar problem, BTS need first to survive, and then can seek more.
BitAssets are not created as a killer to BTS.
BitAssets weren't created to defraud the bitshares community, yet here we are - the committee owned bitassets now permanently disgraced scamcoins.
Shame on you for fundamentally destroying the integrity of bitassets permanently.
On the upside, at least we know now that china's lying about their covid figures since these bitCNY fixed feeds are seemingly fully acceptable to the CCP. Had you not led the bitassets to defraud the entire Bitshares community I might have taken the CN Covid figures at face value and not prepared as well as I did for this quarantine. Cheers mate 👍
if you want to discuss bitCNY issue, let's focus on it, covid figures is another irrelevant problem.
and it's clear that China has solved internal problems and is now helping the whole world. as a Chinese that live in Shanghai I am clear what happened here.
BTW, where do you come from?
It's an identical problem - when faced with an unacceptable situation the outcome has been to repeatedly provide fake numbers.
Trust me when I say nobody believes China has solved the problem, they're simply lying about the figures, exactly like how BSIP76 proponents have behaved with bitCNY (provide fake numbers to escape an undesirable reality). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llgCCybOZoA
Why does my location matter? No courts are open; if I was in china would you be demanding my incarceration? Sad. I may or may not currently reside in the fully independent nation state of Taiwan.
224
General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to prevent bad debt (black swan)
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:21:53 pm »Quote
Let's don't talk about the "scam"
That's what it is though, BSIP76 is a scam. BSIP76 proponents could fairly be categorized as "scammers".
225
OpenLedger / Re: OPEN.GRC DISABLED FOR 2 YEARS WITH NO JUSTIFICATION
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:59:27 am »Did you open a support ticket?Multiple, all closed.
What is your next step now?
My next step? Probably deal with the fact they're permanently inaccessible.
