How long will this be active for then? It's almost been 2 weeks now.

Quote from: R on October 01, 2019, 06:41:10 pm

The vote weight from the 1x CR from any BTS backed bitasset should be allocated to the bitasset holder, not the debt holder.

Bad idea....gives shitloads of power to BTS shorters..and it's much easier to drop price than raise it

I'd rather have that voting weight "lost" ....essentially the debtor's incentive is for price to go up, the holder's is for it to go down....one has put up 1x collateral, the other holds an asset worth 1x collateral with opposite incentives.

I'd say consider them as cancelling each other out and not assign that weight at all

OK, so up to 1x CR of bitassets with BTS backing have 0 vote weight, all CR above 1x have vote weight? Sounds good to me. 👍

I don't support disabling global settlement on committee owned bitassets, I'd far rather see them globally settle than operate a fractional reserve where none of the debtors face consequences.

Good thing that anyone can create a new bitasset to compete against manipulated bitassets though, eh? The market can decide which will survive - I've got a feeling it might be the stable one not the manipulated one.

有人愿意帮他翻译这两份文档吗，他悬赏 7500 BTS。

Quote from: Customminer on September 02, 2019, 08:52:03 pm

I wish to request Chinese translation support for the following documents:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BTS-CM/Hertz-Whitepaper/master/hertz_whitepaper.md (except the preface section, that's part of an old steem post)
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BTS-CM/Norns/master/about.md

2 BTS per word sound alright? So approx 7500 BTS in total for the above two documents?

Regarding the Norns whitepaper, it references deities from Norse mythology using Wikipedia references, it'd be great if relevant articles within online Chinese encyclopedias could be referenced in their place if possible?

I'm looking for price feed publishers for the Norns & hertz:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27749.0;all
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26013.msg334968

Thanks

Anyone interested in the translation?

https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26121&api_key=123abc
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26116&api_key=123abc

The above BSIP WP's were activated for a very short moment this morning, days after the changes were thrust upon witnesses. Why was the BSIP WP process bypassed/disregarded when it comes to such a high impact BSIP?

Why was any outcome of BSIP76 for bitUSD acted upon prior to activation of the WP? Currently none of the BSIP76 WP for bitUSD have activated, thus don't have network consensus on the matter.

https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26119&api_key=123abc
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26122&api_key=123abc
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26120&api_key=123abc

Side note: Looks like the bitshares-ui and bts.ai show 0.00% funding for WP regardless of prior activation, to check if an BSIP ever achieved activation prior to implementation, look up the worker proposal object for the balance id like the following for BSIP76 indicating no network activation/consensus (0 balance, no activation):
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.14.222&api_key=123abc
https://btsapi.grcnode.co.uk/get_bts_object?object_id=1.13.26121&api_key=123abc

Fair enough the purpose of refund400k promoted by its proponents is to block excessive worker payouts, however it's irrefutable that any worker proposal which fails to become activated on the network (for whatever reason) fundamentally lacks network consensus; BSIPs which lack sufficient network consensus perhaps shouldn't be acted upon.

Enforcement of recent BSIPs which were put to worker proposals have instead relied on the intimidation tactic of immediately removing votes (or the threat of) from witnesses who refuse to comply with BSIPs which lack sufficient network consensus. This disagreement on feeds threatens the integrity of the network by pulling the rug out beneath witnesses without prior communication.