Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 68
331
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 五年过去了，分析一下BTS价格如此的低，失败在哪？
« on: September 02, 2019, 10:56:59 pm »
Quote from: clockwork on September 02, 2019, 10:06:39 am
Quote from: binggo on September 01, 2019, 12:51:57 am
Quote from: lovegan007 on August 31, 2019, 06:03:45 pm
为了鼓励参与高倍数抵押的人，应该在“解冻余额”中可以申领 连续抵押了多少天的账户可以申领 理事会的系统中的那10亿BTS的拿一部分来奖励，或者拿市场手续费的一倍份来分红。

不要盯着资金池里的10亿BTS，本来就不应该存在的东西，导致现在人人都在盯着资金池，而不是用真正的收入来覆盖支出，增发的资金池本来是为基础开发置留的，而不是为了各种会议及架构留的.

一个refund400k就能把老外搞的各种疯狂，当初抵制增发的时候这帮人又是什么样的嘴脸？！

锚定资产区收的锚定资产手续费倒是可以拿一部分用来给高倍长期抵押的用户分点红，毕竟这些羊毛出在羊身上，用在羊身上也无可厚非，相当于负利率。

老外的思维落后时代太多，很多问题我们指出并提出解决方案时，他们还在持续性的各种懵逼中，坚持自己的看法就是宇宙真理，等到漫长的时间流逝之后，他们中可能才会有那么一两个人才会意识到问题的表面。

I agree with you regarding real income.

I wrote about this 18 months ago:

https://steemit.com/bitshares/@clockwork/bitshares-fees-the-fee-schedule-and-dex-profitability

I then spent 3 months analyzing chain data and in discussions with stakeholders and traders to implement a new , more efficient/profitable fee schedule.

And then I was treated like the enemy for suggesting that the chain should be profitable like you are saying now and the fee change was cancelled leading to the state of the reserve pool now.

I've ALWAYS acted and commented with the best interests of the platform in mind. It's others who are voting only with their pocket.
Time to resubmit the proposal since now everyone is on board the same concept? If the concept is rejected then the basis for voting for refund400k is proven dishonest & false.

332
中文 (Chinese) / Re: [互助帖] 中文翻译协助 Assistance for English/Chinese Translation
« on: September 02, 2019, 08:52:03 pm »
I wish to request Chinese translation support for the following documents:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BTS-CM/Hertz-Whitepaper/master/hertz_whitepaper.md (except the preface section, that's part of an old steem post)
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BTS-CM/Norns/master/about.md

2 BTS per word sound alright? So approx 7500 BTS in total for the above two documents?

Regarding the Norns whitepaper, it references deities from Norse mythology using Wikipedia references, it'd be great if relevant articles within online Chinese encyclopedias could be referenced in their place if possible?

I'm looking for price feed publishers for the Norns & hertz:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27749.0;all
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26013.msg334968

Thanks

333
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Requesting price feeds for the Hertz ABA
« on: September 02, 2019, 08:48:15 pm »
Bump. Reviving the Hertz price feed publisher request thread, still looking for more price feed publishers 👍

BitUSD is now no longer globally settled, it's operational and so is hertz.

334
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Reduce onboarding registrar
« on: September 02, 2019, 08:29:45 pm »
Quote from: bench on September 02, 2019, 07:25:45 pm
Quote from: Customminer on September 02, 2019, 04:48:30 pm
RE Changing the fee taken, why not propose changing the redistribution of fees from 80:20 so that the network gets more?
Network gets more, faucet gets less. Problem increased!

When the main faucet is not sustainable with the new referral system, we should update our fees.
There was a recent fee structure rebalancing proposal, but it was rejected IIRC. Could request the committee does that too. 👍

335
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Announcement of cn-vote Union: Re-evaluation of our support of Worker Proposals
« on: September 02, 2019, 05:38:54 pm »
Quote from: bitcrab on September 02, 2019, 10:01:18 am
Quote from: xeroc on September 02, 2019, 08:37:56 am
Quote from: bitcrab on September 02, 2019, 02:24:33 am
however, I don't think it's very difficult to find skilled enough developers to do the core dev job.
Uff, have you ever looked into *their* job?
Since I am in a closed telegram group with the core dev team, I can tell you, it's *WAY* over my head ... and I'd call myself well-educated.
OK，maybe I was wrong.
It's going to be exceedingly difficult and expensive to replace the development capabilities lost due to refund400k. It's concerning that you're unaware of what you're blocking & the subsequent future consequences that burning these bridges will result in.

336
General Discussion / Re: Please cancel the vote on those proposals for taking money! !
« on: September 02, 2019, 04:53:31 pm »
Quote from: xiaoyu8086 on September 02, 2019, 02:50:15 am
You have a meeting again and again, taking money from the BTS again and again, and then cashing in. Caused the BTS to plunge again and again, you are rubbish!
This is false, the worker proposals are not the source of BTS price depreciation. Whoever informed you this was the case has misled you. Stop spreading misinformation.

Quote from: xiaoyu8086 on September 02, 2019, 02:50:15 am
And those workers, do nothing, the wages are still taken, how can the price of BTS rise? ? ?
Again, completely false. Many of the worker proposals are highly productive, highly transparent, and are not the source of price downtrend.

Without UI, Core & HTD workers your BTS would be extremely at risk. You don't know what you're talking about.

Quote from: xiaoyu8086 on September 02, 2019, 02:50:15 am
For the development of BTS, resolutely resist the destruction of BTS by these unscrupulous guys!
Please cancel the vote on those proposals for taking money! !
To vote for refund400k is to vote for austerity, to vote for a cease of development, to vote for worse security, to vote for a price downtrend. None of the workers are 'unscrupulous', your misinformation to drive refund400k forwards is what is unscrupulous.

337
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Reduce onboarding registrar
« on: September 02, 2019, 04:48:30 pm »
Quote from: ioBanker on September 02, 2019, 10:47:08 am
Quote from: bench on September 02, 2019, 01:04:13 am
At the moment the onboarding.bitshares.foundation takes 15% as registrar.
To stay competitive with OpenLedger the registrar should also be set to 0%.

Registrar cut was introduced to cover costs for signup, but with low signup costs and new referral system(market fee share), this is not needed anymore.

Network onboarding.bitshares.foundation should be the best competing faucet since it's backed by bitshares worker, OL is using his 0% faucet's feature to gain more voting power while advertising his faucet to be competing with the network's official faucet.
The faucet worker proposal has been blocked by refund400k, it may eventually stop working and new users will be impeded from joining.

RE Changing the fee taken, why not propose changing the redistribution of fees from 80:20 so that the network gets more? Problem solved, can remove refund400k vote.

338
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Announcement of cn-vote Union: Re-evaluation of our support of Worker Proposals
« on: September 02, 2019, 12:53:00 am »
Quote from: binggo on September 02, 2019, 12:21:12 am
The core team have got the enought fund already.

I didn't think this is the time or future to support all the worker.

The income of the DEX can't support all the worker, only can support one or two worker.

The reserve pool? it shouldn't exsit, the worker fund shouldn't attach to the reserve pool, it should attach to the income，so we can determine easily which worker is necessary.
The core team don't have enough funding for the full worker proposed goals.

The income of the DEX certainly can support all the workers, you're wrong. If you're concerned you can propose referral fee redistribution towards reserve pool inflation, but this solution is being ignored instead going straight to the nuclear option of destroying ongoing workers with no justifiable reason.

Why shouldn't the reserve pool exist? It's been the intended functionality for years now and doesn't have any negative impact on BTS economy.

339
General Discussion / Re: AVG2907 dumping price massivly ?
« on: September 01, 2019, 11:10:36 pm »
Quote
this solution may increase the possibility of a black swan event
Global Settlement*. Since BSIP18 the black swan scenario has solutions, thus this term is outdated.

340
General Discussion / Re: Pump100k
« on: September 01, 2019, 11:08:18 pm »
Why focus solely on bitCNY? Why not the norns given the reduction in risk?

341
General Discussion / Re: AVG2907 dumping price massivly ?
« on: August 31, 2019, 11:24:20 pm »






342
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Announcement of cn-vote Union: Re-evaluation of our support of Worker Proposals
« on: August 31, 2019, 11:10:44 pm »
Quote from: bitcrab on August 31, 2019, 03:04:58 pm
Same logic, don't the BTS holders from China understand what sense can workers like wirex make?

Whilst Wirex wouldn't immediately be available in China, but by enhancing the Bitshares ecosystem in US, EMEA & soon SEA, the holders from China will benefit.

Quote from: bitcrab on August 31, 2019, 03:04:58 pm
in my view, when BTS price is under 0.3CNY or there are margin call orders in CNY/USD markets, any big workers should be stopped immediately.

Indiscriminately stopping all workers may damage the Bitshares network. Reputation & Brand has already been inflicted by refund400k due to the conferences being at-risk/cancelled. One could theorize that the recent price drops are influenced by refund400k, the opposite of the intended effect.


343
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] North American BitShares Conference + WCC DEVCON |Updated 7/10
« on: August 31, 2019, 10:38:07 pm »
I'm sorry to see the conference being cancelled due to refund400k voters, this is quite unfortunate.

344
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Seeking price feed publishers for the Norns (Urthr, Verthandi & Skuld)
« on: August 31, 2019, 10:32:11 pm »
Quote from: bench on August 30, 2019, 12:19:55 pm
Quote from: Customminer on August 29, 2019, 09:29:33 pm
Quote from: bench on August 29, 2019, 06:10:48 pm
Quote from: Customminer on August 28, 2019, 06:36:04 pm
Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍
You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!
Market fee permission is permanently disabled.
Why ?

The market fee permission was disabled for the Norns to reduce potential regulatory hurdles/issues.

Other users on the Bitshares platform are welcome to create their own alternative algorithm based assets with market fees enabled, using the existing Norn price feed scripts (MIT licensed).

The network will still earn fees from any Norn related operations on the bitshares platform.

I've not had any direct feedback from potential price feed publishers regarding fees prohibiting their price feed publishing participation, they're one of the cheapest operations on the network. I've created 6M+ price feed operations on the bitshares network so far for hertz & the norns.

345
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Seeking price feed publishers for the Norns (Urthr, Verthandi & Skuld)
« on: August 29, 2019, 09:29:33 pm »
Quote from: bench on August 29, 2019, 06:10:48 pm
Quote from: Customminer on August 28, 2019, 06:36:04 pm
Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍
You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!
Market fee permission is permanently disabled.

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 68

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 23 queries.