I'm sorry to see the conference being cancelled due to refund400k voters, this is quite unfortunate.

Quote from: Customminer on August 28, 2019, 06:36:04 pm

Bump. Still looking for further price feed publishers & market participants 👍

You should set up a market fee and share it to price feed publisher!

Market fee permission is permanently disabled.

agree

disagree

NABTS2019

Was an upcoming dedicated Bitshares conference in North America; its deactivation is a major loss for Bitshares marketing opportunity.

DEXBot WP3 - Liquidity for the DEX

Highly active community worker proposal for developing an open source trading bot for Bitshares; this worker is highly beneficial to the Bitshares liquidity and market bootstrapping. There are no equal featured alternative Bitshares trading bots.

201907-steemfest

Promoting Bitshares at Steemfest - an soon to be lost opportunity to market Bitshares to new users.

201902-reference-faucet

Without this new users would be unable to register on the Bitshares network. How don't you know this? Are you using an alternative? There's no actively maintained alternative registration faucets, blocking this would deter new users from Bitshares.

2019-06-decentralized-partnership

A soon to be lost marketing opportunity for Bitshares.

By blocking decentralized, steemfest & nabts2019 worker proposals you disregard marketing/advertising across America, Europe, Middle east & Africa entirely.

201902-infrastructure

Required so that web wallets have servers to connect to. By attacking this WP you threaten the Bitshares infrastructure for us all.

Who are you? Why apply for such a huge expense?

Most of the worker proposals are highly transparent and you can find this information out if you were to do some digging.

These expenses are fair market rates for highly specialist contract developers, if you can undercut the existing dev worker proposals then do submit one else this is empty complaining.

Is it really necessary for you to exist?

Yes, very.

Why don't you tell us what's going on and what's going on?

The three marketing/conference workers are for events in the future, they can't provide you information on content which does not yet exist. You can find out more info on steemfest & decentralized by visiting their dedicated websites & the nabts wp you could have asked in its dedicated 'stakeholder proposal' thread.

The infrastructure and faucet workers don't provide constant update reports because they're passively operational software stacks for maintaining the operational state of the Bitshares network.

Who's to say you're not corrupt?

Unless you've got clear evidence of corruption, don't make accusations of bad faith. Most of the above worker proposals are highly transparent. From my perspective you're attacking the Bitshares network with this fraudulent narrative.

Would a BSIP request be the most direct method of requesting price feed publisher support from the witnesses for GDEX.BTC? 🤔 Or would that set a bad precedent?

My suggestion is to stop all stoppable workers by voting until the market recovers, and then resume as appropriate.

Don't vote for refund400k, worker proposals are not the source of BTS' price downtrend & most worker proposals are not feasibly stoppable without causing loss of developer resources/capabilities, loss of investor confidence and loss of marketing opportunities. Austerity has proven to be a failed economic policy, rather than blocking workers out of fear of price uncertainty invest in workers for the future of Bitshares to be more easily realized whilst other platforms stagnate.

The emission of BTS from worker proposals is not the source of price downtrend; don't spread that misinformation. Austerity is not a sustainable economic policy, it does far more harm than good. By voting for refund400k you risk loss of development capabilities, loss of marketing opportunities, you put the security of the network and client at risk by impeding development.

Don't vote for refund400k because of the low price of BTS, it's going to do more harm than good. The majority of the recently de-activated and currently active worker proposals are worth funding and are not the cause of BTS price downtrend.