391
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Payger - Payment + Messenger
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:54:38 pm »
Would you be able to add support for SMOKE & RUDEX.SMOKE please? Thanks 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
392
General Discussion / Re: Sharebits, Whaleshares, Stakemine -- All operational!
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:51:45 pm »
will stakemine support beos in the future?
393
General Discussion / Re: How much responsebility does a larger investor have?
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:36:22 pm »Do you want to control this situation?
Charge fees from the margin call，then he will become responsebal for his debt.
What % would you recommend?
394
General Discussion / Re: topics to be discussed in Shanghai
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:35:41 pm »
How did these discussions go?
395
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:33:25 pm »
Could you please encourage price feed support for the following assets? Thanks
Hertz, Urthr, Verthandi, Skuld.
https://norns.hertz.network/
https://crypto.fans/hertz/
Hertz, Urthr, Verthandi, Skuld.
https://norns.hertz.network/
https://crypto.fans/hertz/
396
General Discussion / Re: Ryan R. Fox Introduces the BitShares Core Team 2019 Roadmap and Future in China
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:28:16 pm »
Good to see the conference went well, I'm glad that core devs were able to attend.
397
General Discussion / Re: First BitShares-sponsored research paper submitted for review
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:26:09 pm »
Great work biophil 👍
Supporting your worker proposal should be a high priority for all 👌
Supporting your worker proposal should be a high priority for all 👌
398
General Discussion / Re: Allow non-LTM accounts to be referrers?
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:24:24 pm »
Rather than entirely removing the LTM requirement, what about a minimum BTS balance requirement for referral mechanism access?
399
General Discussion / Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« on: August 17, 2019, 03:23:07 pm »
Is using a translate tool insufficient for understanding ongoing worker proposals? If websites don't work with these tools, this can be amended.
400
General Discussion / Re: suggestion on new OMO fund
« on: August 17, 2019, 02:58:33 pm »Quote
Another key factor is that, at that moment, smartcoin rules is not robust enough to resist shorting attack.
Only bitassets which are pegged to external price references cannot resist 'shorting attacks'. Smartcoins like the Norns (https://norns.hertz.network/) are completely resistant to BTS' external price fluctuations. An OMO for them would be far less risky than one for BTS:CNY/USD, imo.
401
General Discussion / Re: Why Need BSIP For Everything?
« on: August 17, 2019, 02:42:36 pm »The fact is, due to fear of being voted out, most of witnesses don't proactively take actions or voice their opinions.Does this mean witnesses wouldn't provide price feed support for new mpa without a BSIP? Perhaps that's the fastest way of getting price feed support.. 🤔
So current situations is, vote first, then act according to result of voting. Not bad.
402
General Discussion / Re: It's a basket currency
« on: August 17, 2019, 02:38:35 pm »
Maybe, however non-committee owned mpa don't get much attention
403
General Discussion / Re: Allow non-LTM accounts to be referrers?
« on: August 05, 2019, 09:29:19 am »
$100 isn't a lot to ask for LTM. If they can't do that, I doubt they have a legit stream of users to refer.
404
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts on new OMO fund
« on: July 30, 2019, 12:59:08 am »
Would it only focus on core bitassets? Or could private smartcoins like the norns be in scope?
405
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Bitshares-UI - First 6 months of worker results
« on: July 26, 2019, 12:46:33 pm »
Great work 👍
