Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Customminer

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31
391
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 17, 2017, 03:38:42 pm »
I thought the idea of Gridcoin is to combine POW with making calculations that are helpful to science.
What purpose does Bitshares server here? I am sure the answer is simple, I just don't get it.
Gridcoin does not use POW, it rewards verified BOINC computation on top of Proof of Stake.

The purpose of Bitshares is to serve as a decentralized exchange where we can trade open.grc upon.. lol

392
General Discussion / Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 17, 2017, 10:16:02 am »
https://steemit.com/gridcoin/@cm-steem/gridcoin-s-customised-bitshares-web-wallet-dex

The Gridcoin community has begun customizing the Bitshares web wallet, prioritizing OPEN.GRC as a featured asset & main trading pair against many important BTS assets!

It only took a day of editing (and a day of messing with the build environment) to get this far. It's not a live wallet for the public, but still in development & open-source for anyone to run locally.

I might create a guide for setting up a similar build environment using Windows and Virtualbox if anyone's interested?

I hope to add in new drop-down menus to the right of 'Deposit/Withdraw', linking to the other web wallets (OpenLedger, FreedomLedger, BTSABC, etc) and to BOINC/BTS/Gridcoin community links. The *.JSX is a tad confusing though..

Some of the screenshots still show Open.BTC being used as the trading pair, this has been changed.

Thoughts?



393
General Discussion / Re: TASKMANAGER Asset Info
« on: January 16, 2017, 09:57:16 pm »
In the GRC customized BTS web wallet, TASKMANAGER is a featured asset w/ an icon https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/51921-grc-bitshares-dex-grc-dex/ :D

394
Beyond Bitcoin / Re: [TEST] ShareBits Testing Thread
« on: January 12, 2017, 12:44:55 pm »
Cool, can we tip any asset via the forum?

395
Minimum required changes to revive an MPA after a black swan event: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23334.15.html

Very relevant to this thread.

396
Quick update regarding the 'GRIDCOIN' MPA - The Gridcoin price fluctuated, triggered a black swan state and the asset has been stuck in said state ever since: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22733.msg299091.html#msg299091

It has however opened the door to new developments by PC regarding MPA resiliency to black swan events. Once these new changes are in effect, the Gridcoin community will reactivate the market pegged asset, requiring more witnesses to produce the price feed.

Prior to the black swan event we only had 2 or 3 witnesses out of 25 (27?), whilst changing the witness count may be a dangerous idea the concept of vote weight degradation over time for witnesses and committee members is still sound.

What does everyone think?

397
General Discussion / Re: Changes I think Openledger needs
« on: November 21, 2016, 01:49:58 pm »
ad. 2
I strongly disagree!
First of all, this is Bitshares Wallet and openledger is one of the companies out there that emits its IOU,
there is no reason to be in any way favor

The bitshares blockchain will never limit the trading of any tokens against any other tokens. bitshares.org/wallet is the bitshares wallet

But why would a company like openledger want to support another companies UIA. Like i said in my example Poloniex doesn't let you trade Bitstamp dollars.
Perhaps a show/hide toggle for alternative EBA which have a similar purpose would be more appropriate than only showing OL's EBA?

If there was automatic bridging between identical EBA's then this would be less of an issue, you could just show 'eba.usd' rather than open.usd tether.usd etc.

398
General Discussion / Re: Another cryptonomex spin off?
« on: November 05, 2016, 02:48:40 pm »
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22317.msg290945.html#msg290945
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22561.0.html

Hopefully this isn't his planned merger of BTS + STEEM + <new project>, if it is we must utilize BTS stake weight voting rather than allowing a forced take-over! https://github.com/FollowMyVote/StakeWeightedVoting

399
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] BitShares Webdesign Mockup
« on: October 30, 2016, 03:01:54 pm »
I'll be voting to support this worker proposal, can't wait for the bitshares website to be redesigned :)

400
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: October 29, 2016, 01:28:08 pm »
Looks great! :D

I'll be adding the open.grc link to the gridcoin website https://btsbots.com/a/OPEN.GRC

Keep up the good work!

402
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin
« on: October 29, 2016, 11:53:47 am »

404
Technical Support / Re: freedomledger: loss of wallet password
« on: October 22, 2016, 04:24:17 pm »
You are your own bank, I don't believe that freedom ledger has any ability to change your password. If you cannot remember your password then you've lost access to your funds.

405
Decentralized voting (continuous) would also be needed for voting project in/out, or do you think that should be up to the elected statistics committee? (That may provide them too much power though).

https://followmyvote.com/its-alive-follow-my-vote-launches-blockchain-voting-software-on-the-bitshares-blockchain/ Pretty cool graphene voting developments - related to this post.

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31