Testnet:
faucet: https://faucet.testnet.bitshares.eu
prefix: TEST

Mainnet:
faucet: https://faucet.bitshares.eu
prefix: BTS

If you send a public key with the wrong prefix to the faucets, they will raise an error/exception.
Is that what you are looking for?

Quote from: Customminer on January 16, 2019, 12:41:29 pm

Quote from: xeroc on January 14, 2019, 02:09:19 pm

Quote from: Customminer on January 14, 2019, 12:20:58 pm

Could this worker help with this issue? https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1773

BitShares.eu will give you a warning (that will show nicely in the UI) in case you try to create an account with keys for a different blockchain.
From a faucet POV, we can only identify "wrong blockchain" by means of the "prefix" (the first characters in your public key, e.g. BTSxxxxxxx).
If someone sets up a private blockchain and uses the same BTS prefix, then there is no way if knowing the users wants those accounts to be created somewhere else - in fact, the keys are identical then!

Could you help with the documentation aspect of private faucet & testnet setup please? I hadn't realized that you'd get an error if you changed the prefix, in my past security research I was blocked by an inability to use a private faucet on my private testnet :/ I've probably registered 10 accounts on the public testnet instead of the private testnet during early attempts 😂

No, I'm hoping for improved documentation/support for private testnet faucet implmentation. Public testnet is not on the table for security research as it breaches HackTheDEX TOS.

Could this worker help with this issue? https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1773

Are you ok with users using your XOVBTC as backing collateral for bitassets on the BTS DEX?

Do you plan on adding RUDEX UIA (exchange backed assets like RUDEX.GRC) support to Payger in the future? I massively appreciate the addition of OPEN.GRC, however OL has had this EBA on hold (suspended deposits/withdrawals) since early 2017 where as RUDEX.GRC has active deposits/withdrawals. OPEN.GRC did survive the most recent delisting wave: https://dex.openledger.io/news/announcement-gateways-openledger-dex/

Where Payger could fit into the Gridcoin ecosystem is within a theoretical commercialized BOINC project. BOINC projects perform volunteer distributed computing, by adding a paywall and a generic compute task submission process, one could spin up cloud computing businesses (offering compute in return for crypto) with effectively free computing power to compete against Golem, iEXc, sonm, and traditional cloud VPS businesses. The changes could take place within the existing (decades old) BOINC web server code which is programmed mostly in PHP and C++.

Keep up the good work though guys, it was great meeting you all in person at bitfest 👍

Does not publishing price feeds for 'private bitassets' count as cheating? 🤔

I can't see the images, can you use an international image host like imgur please?

Quote from: xeroc on December 20, 2018, 10:48:54 am

What the heck are you talking about? Could you please explain in clearer words?
Also, please don't swear ..

Now, some whales do not produce bitcny, oppose bsip41 and bsip42, and prevent other users from producing bitcny

Nobody is preventing you from borrowing bitCNY, the only time this would be the case is if there was a global settlement for bitCNY. Why don't you borrow the bitCNY into existence yourself or enable your customers to borrow CNY using BTS if that's your business model?

Quote from: cryptofalcon on December 19, 2018, 10:00:40 am

Quote from: Customminer on December 18, 2018, 11:19:45 am

BSIP-0023 is somewhat relevant, however it focuses on external cryptocurrency snapshots: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0023.md

Several of the bitcoin forks have market caps 10x BTS, a single UIA worth billions could justify sharedrop BSIP research 👌

@Customminer, we do not currently see a Use Case for this particular BSIP.
If you have one in mind, please share with the community and let's talk!

Sorry, I will vote for no until these wrong feed price been voted out.
I don't think witness should execute it until it become an active worker.

What do price feeds matter when it comes to worker proposals entirely unrelated to price feeds? Don't stagnate BTS' development over broken bitassets.