Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 67
602
What are your plans for publishing price feeds? Would you consider publishing feeds for Hertz?

603
General Discussion / Re: Unfortunately, it seems clear to me ..
« on: March 18, 2018, 10:44:45 pm »
This will ultimately raise a few questions about the STEALTH token which is a FeeBacked Asset that has been given by Dan for the development of Stealth. If the backend devs where to continue its development using funds from the reserves, it would only be fair to re-evaluate how well those that currently hold STEALTH (those that have interest in its development and usage), performed in the last 2-3 years.
For me, it never made sense to work on STEALTH only so that some other people (STEALTH holders) can earn money of it.
If solely implemented by the bitshares-core dev worker proposal then non-FBA is appropriate, otherwise fair enough. There'd be nothing stopping the copy/pasting of the stealth code without the FBA though right?
In a hardfork, yes.
But that requires (as usual) a BSIP and the approval of BTS holders.
In this case, not only need approval of BTS holders but also STEALTH holders. There is a somewhat "social contract".
A social contract between some parties who no longer associate with BTS, ultimately the only social contract which should have been established is a worker proposal.

604
I object to chris4210 advising anybody about anything  :o
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0022.md is likely the only way to lose votes from committee positions, lol

Time to join the committee?

605
General Discussion / Re: Unfortunately, it seems clear to me ..
« on: March 18, 2018, 02:28:28 am »
This will ultimately raise a few questions about the STEALTH token which is a FeeBacked Asset that has been given by Dan for the development of Stealth. If the backend devs where to continue its development using funds from the reserves, it would only be fair to re-evaluate how well those that currently hold STEALTH (those that have interest in its development and usage), performed in the last 2-3 years.
For me, it never made sense to work on STEALTH only so that some other people (STEALTH holders) can earn money of it.
If solely implemented by the bitshares-core dev worker proposal then non-FBA is appropriate, otherwise fair enough. There'd be nothing stopping the copy/pasting of the stealth code without the FBA though right?

606
General Discussion / Re: 5 Node Verified Price Feed - Python
« on: March 18, 2018, 02:25:18 am »
> working under the assumption that any node can provide rogue price feeds at any given time,

You can select witnesses, committee or 25 private price feed publishers, so just don't provide permission to untrustworthy entities?

607
"The deadline of claiming BITE: 2018/4/2 00:00 GMT+8."

Such an artificial sharedrop claim deadline is unapealling, BTS2.0 has no limit on sharedrop claims & BITE shouldn't either.

608
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: March 15, 2018, 11:50:39 pm »
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-aba-whitepaper-markdown-edition-translations-inbound

Whitepaper in markdown format for steemit (for PDF phobic users).

Cheers.

609
General Discussion / Re: BTS dropped from Shapeshift? Alternatives?
« on: March 15, 2018, 11:47:47 pm »
The flyp.me devs seemed in support of Bitshares on Telegram, I'd imagine that the foundation reaching out to them would be successful.

610
General Discussion / Re: Unfortunately, it seems clear to me ..
« on: March 15, 2018, 11:47:01 pm »
> Dan has gone off the deep end about the privacy topic,

Dan is not involved in BTS anymore, so who cares?

> Stan is all about regulation and playing nice with the SEC now

One can certainly have private transactions whilst still being SEC compliant.

> Could it be that I'm just out of the loop?

Yes. https://t.me/Agorise

611
Oh dang, I was enjoying those low fees  :'( haha

612
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: March 12, 2018, 11:54:03 pm »
Had an interesting discussion with an user on the /r/cryptomarkets subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/811cv0/hertz_an_oscillating_usd_pegged_algorithm_based/dv01paz/

Their idea for algorithm based assets:

613
Don't want market fees? Use Hertz :D http://open-explorer.io/#/assets/HERTZ

615
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@stan/bitshares-org-gets-long-awaited-face-lift

Stan/Cryptonomex apparently just transferred ownership of bitshares.org to Apasia.tech - a for-profit entity that isn't an active witness/committee member nor a part of the Bitshares foundation.

Is anyone else concerned by this? Wouldn't it have been more appropriate for the ownership transfer to have been made to the committee, witnesses or to the bitshares foundation instead of a private for-profit company?

Take precautions - I'd consider using the light wallet over the reference org wallet until we know what's going on.

Cheers

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 67