751
General Discussion / Re: open sourcing the explorer.
« on: December 26, 2017, 12:45:35 pm »
Looks great, keep up the excellent work 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
752
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares UI Customization Guide!
« on: December 26, 2017, 12:42:24 pm »Hello !
Thank you very much for your posts !
However I have a lot of difficulties personalising the 'topmarkets' dashboard. I followed the guide but most tradings pair doesn't appear, even though I added pictures in the right sizing.
Any help on this would be very much appreciated !
With best regards,
Tatch
The BTS-UI has changed quite a lot since this guide was created, it's possible that the instructions are no longer accurate.
Are there any errors showing in the web browser console?
You may need to remove/replace some of the default trading pairs from the main page for your additions to show.
753
Meta / Re: do you have modify the trade logic in this fork?
« on: December 26, 2017, 12:38:05 pm »as the most active trader in DEX,
nobody ever told me about these rule.
so where is my compensation?
Bitshares owes you no compensation, in accordance with the implemented MIT license: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Specifically:
Quote
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.
754
General Discussion / Re: Is there a block explorer for the Bitshares 1.0 blockchain to verify balances
« on: December 26, 2017, 12:33:06 pm »
AFAIK no such service exists. If you imported your private keys then you'll have the correct amount, the only scenario in which you wouldn't have your owed amount is if you forgot another account you had?
755
General Discussion / Re: 606 bts will prevent website from using bitshares
« on: December 26, 2017, 12:31:59 pm »
Fees can be adjusted at any time by the committee, they were set back when the price was far lower - if you want to issue a token and believe the costs are too high then contact your elected committee members regarding these concerns.
756
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIPs 23 & 24
« on: December 02, 2017, 12:32:19 pm »
RE: BSIP-0023, we've missed the opportunity to have the first BTC token sharedropped onto a graphene chain: https://news.bitcoin.com/the-first-dpos-hard-fork-lightning-bitcoin-is-on-the-way/
That said, it's still massively worthwhile researching the ability to sharedrop an UIA based on an external crypto snapshot.
That said, it's still massively worthwhile researching the ability to sharedrop an UIA based on an external crypto snapshot.
757
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Abit - Core Developer [工作提案] 后端开发
« on: December 02, 2017, 12:31:02 pm »
Sounds good to me - let's vote to pay some great developers! 
758
General Discussion / Re: OpenLedger propose Bitshares 3.0 enhancements (NEW)
« on: December 02, 2017, 12:29:54 pm »Tether has zero proven backing collateral, and is centrally issued. I'd avoid it at all costs.I remember that CoinHoarder use to be supporter of BTS.
What happened?
Meh, kind of a lot of reasons.
- I realized the Larimers are greedy when they stopped sharedropping PTS/AGS, due to the stuff with the Bitshares DAC mergers, and how the Steem project started.
- I disagreed with the lack of development (pretty much only GUI work done since Dan left)
- I felt like my opinions and ideas weren't taken seriously by the community.
- I realized there are better designed DEXs that will eventually come to fruition that don't use IOUs or derivatives.
- Tether kicked bitUSD's butt.
- The proliferation of Bitshares vaporware fork scams that never seem to come to fuition (or at least to their full potential) by "community" members.
Even with all that stuff, I still root for Bitshares because I was such an avid supporter in its beginning. Some people bought BTS because of my advice, so I want Bitshares to succeed. I just dont own any anymore. I have always been a Bitshares supporter, but I am more honest and blunt than most, so my posts may not come off that way.
Am I the only one here that thinks tether usd has become total scam ?
759
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Trading Live on AEX (BTC38)
« on: December 02, 2017, 12:28:08 pm »
Excellent news! Takes a while to load for me, but it's great to see an exchange accept smartcoins
760
General Discussion / Re: Where can I find JSON-RPC model example that I could pass to the BitShares node?
« on: December 02, 2017, 12:26:31 pm »
You need to interact with a full node which provides RPC access.
761
General Discussion / Re: How "OPEN" should we be?
« on: October 28, 2017, 01:21:28 pm »
Anyone can perform analytics against the BTS blockchain historical data, if you're not using stealth/confidential-transactions then this is a given fact.
I do believe that this public data is valuable for us all though, we can gain insights into the utilization of BTS for use in marketing.
If google ends up publicly analyzing the BTS DEX data, then that's great for our mainstream exposure.
I do believe that this public data is valuable for us all though, we can gain insights into the utilization of BTS for use in marketing.
If google ends up publicly analyzing the BTS DEX data, then that's great for our mainstream exposure.
762
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BitShares Improvement Proposal (BSIP) document for Stealth.
« on: October 25, 2017, 11:37:43 am »
Would this be paid work? I've written a few BSIPs recently.
763
General Discussion / Re: OpenLedger propose Bitshares 3.0 enhancements (NEW)
« on: October 25, 2017, 11:32:56 am »
and it's still nothing they can work on right now.
Not a fact.
Current Bitshares functionality will need to be implemented as an EOS native smart contract. This work can start now.
Given zero BSIPs on the routes to EOS integration, this isn't a serious proposal and won't make it in time for the ICO. Perhaps bringing some of EOS' functionality to BTS is plausible, but BTS merging into/onto EOS is highly unlikely.
OP: Got any BSIPs to share?
764
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares huge advantages over Ether just evaporated
« on: October 20, 2017, 10:24:27 pm »
Execution time of 1.5 minutes? Pathetic! Bring it down to several seconds then we're talking. In the mean time, ETH remains garbage tier baby crypto investment.
765
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] Joining in as BitShares Witness as "sc-ol"
« on: October 20, 2017, 10:16:04 pm »
I’m all ears to support an MPA or SmartCoin that doesn’t require an active witness for price feeds, just contact me, and I would be happy to talk about it.
I'm present on the BitShares Witness Telegram channel, as well as here and Steemit.
Howdy!
Check out my thread on https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,25083.msg311587.html#msg311587
I'm pushing for creation of BitETH and BitZEC as new smartcoins. I'd like them to be eventually adopted by "official" witnesses, but not sure of the mechanism for that. What are your thoughts?
In the current pre-bsip-0018 state of the network, crypto based smartcoins (MPAs) are vulnerable to global settlement ('black swan') events, once the BTS network has hard-forked to include bsip-0018 at the end of november, such assets will be more plausible for the long term.
That said, there's more interesting MPAs out there especially in the Algorithm Based Asset category of MPAs, IMO.
Keep it real,
CM.
