Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 68
782
I've added the door.one exchange to gridcoin.us, as we have the open.grc gateway on the bts dex. Looking forwards to this being in production :)

783
General Discussion / Re: Market pegged assets
« on: August 30, 2017, 02:09:19 pm »
You can always buy USD directly with your BTS instead of lending the USD into existence, that way you don't need to worry about collateral.

784
General Discussion / Re: BlockPay in Serious Trouble
« on: August 30, 2017, 02:07:18 pm »
https://blockpay.ch/general/blockpay-status-update/

They just posted an announcement there regarding the split, terrible ico lol..

785
Stakeholder Proposals / BSIPs 23 & 24
« on: August 29, 2017, 11:15:55 pm »
I've created two draft BSIPs:

BSIP-0023 - Sharedropping an UIA against an external cryptocurrency distribution snapshot
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/draft-bsip-0023-sharedropping-an-uia-against-an-external-cryptocurrency-distribution-snapshot

Draft BSIP-0024 - "Locking Bitshares away as 'Bitshares Influence' for voting privileges on the BTS DEX"
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/draft-bsip-0024-locking-bitshares-away-as-bitshares-influence-for-voting-privileges-on-the-bts-dex

I'd appreciate input on both, they're drafts and haven't been submitted as a pull request into the BSIP repo yet.

Thanks +5%

786
Hell yeah, man! This is some quality original content, great work guys!  +5%

You should consider briefly talking about this project during the weekly Bitshares hangouts on mumble/steemit: https://steemit.com/bitshares/@officialfuzzy/bitshares-hangout-36-2017-09-01-opensource-agenda-beyondbit-payouts-powered-by-sp

787
General Discussion / Re: BCH or BCC in dex?
« on: August 25, 2017, 02:25:48 am »
We do not currently have Bitcoin Cash supported within the BTS DEX. You should contact a gateway service such as openledger to include this token.
You're fucking joking right? Can't add a smartcoin to the dex until there is a gateway? da fuq? Does openledger control the bts code? Since when dou we need the actual physical tokens to be able to trade in the dex? Is this legit or was it a dumb response, because there is a similar reply in tech support too?


*BTS is the fucking gateway to the dex!!!! Am i missing something????

You can certainly make an MPA for bitcoin cash, I thought you were asking for an open.bch to deposit your BCH onto the BTS DEX using an EBA UIA.

788
General Discussion / Re: BCH or BCC in dex?
« on: August 23, 2017, 01:57:11 pm »
We do not currently have Bitcoin Cash supported within the BTS DEX. You should contact a gateway service such as openledger to include this token.

789
General Discussion / Re: Why no wikipedia page for Bitshares?
« on: August 16, 2017, 03:26:26 pm »
Wikipedia is notorious for deleting content, best of luck if you're intending on creating a Bitshares wikipedia article.

790
General Discussion / Re: HERO's arch nemesis! The opposite of 'HERO'
« on: August 08, 2017, 11:25:56 am »
Like the sounds of these ideas to some degree but don't like the continuous interest rate.

It's not interest but rather appreciation of assets by the predictable modification of the price feed.

Anything with an interest rate may destroy itself after thirty cycles.  Whatever those cycles may be.  Brings me back to a special asset that I have been thinking about for longer than bitcoin has been around.  May have to dig up those notes and further explore something that would be between the USD and HERO that may not has so much interest pressure.  But more of a mechanism that minimizes the long tern interest destruction factor that I have some long term concern of.

What do you mean cycles? The hertz sin waves? That'd still be almost 3 years though :P

I'd be interested in reading your previous research.

791
General Discussion / Re: Sidechains should be a priority for bitshares.
« on: August 06, 2017, 12:18:58 am »
We should work on a draft BSIP for the potential implementation of sidechains.

We do have the UIA Gateways though, there will probably be more popping up in the future (we should encourage existing exchanges to run their own BTS gateway).

http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/drivechain/
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Atomic_cross-chain_trading

Would sidechains require witnesses to monitor external block explorers or run full clients? The later would be asking a lot of the witnesses.

792
General Discussion / Re: HERO's arch nemesis! The opposite of 'HERO'
« on: August 05, 2017, 03:56:58 pm »
I was thinking about NEMESIS last night.

Say if we were to decrease the feed price at a rate of 0.25% each day, with a start price of $1000 the token would function for 9958 days (~27.29 years) before hitting the max decimal places (0.00000001). If we had a higher starting feed price (Greater than $1000) then we could increase the feed price reduction rate whilst maintaining more than a decade of functionality..

Holding the NEMESIS as long term savings wouldn't make sense, however given that shorters who lend the token into existence would experience a debt destruction rate of 0.25% (+) per day there would be overwhelming sell pressure at (or below) the feed price.

The risk that those holding NEMESIS are left holding a sour bag nobody wants to buy isn't a concern given that they can simply settle the MPA and margin call the shorters. Given that there would be overwhelming sell pressure there would be a very small likelihood of a global-settlement/blackswan as there would be available sell orders at or below the feed price.

Would anyone be interested in the debt destroying Nemesis token? Can you think of a better name, given that NEM exists and nemesis might infringe on resident evil's copyrights (possibly?).

793
does this include:

* work on open source explorer gui ( @oxarbitrage )

I don't think so:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24097.msg309466.html#msg309466
Worker proposal '1.14.55' covers the open source explorer, not this thread's worker proposal.

794
Technical Support / Updated Bitshares client on official website?
« on: August 03, 2017, 12:52:12 pm »
Hey,

Several users have been asking for an updated bitshares client update on the bitshares.org website, the last client release was 22nd may. Who is in charge of bitshares.org and or release management?

Cheers

795
General Discussion / Re: sidechains and trustless gateways
« on: August 01, 2017, 09:16:30 pm »
When EOS  delivers what they promise, I'll move all my funds into it and forget about bitshares. Until then, I don't care neither about EOS nor about EOS sidechain.
Well it's a good thing we've got at least a year before then, so let's get brainstorming some ideas!

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 68