Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68
931
General Discussion / Re: Interactive Charts and Graphs
« on: April 01, 2017, 10:37:12 pm »
Very nice charts, what do you think about netdata for real-time Bitshares charts? https://github.com/firehol/netdata/

932
General Discussion / Re: New updated version - Moonstone Wallet Beta
« on: April 01, 2017, 10:24:39 pm »
Looks good, I've reported a few bugs using the google bug reporting tool.

Keep up the good work guys :)

Are you planning on creating an android wallet?

933
General Discussion / Re: [Testnet-StressTest] March 15th - 3:00pm UTC
« on: March 31, 2017, 09:06:33 pm »
I spoke during the 14th Bitshares hangout regarding the potential Bitshares BOINC project for stress-testing, rewarding full/api nodes, testnet experiments, etc.

Unnofficial recording: https://steemit.com/beyondbitcoin/@glitterfart/bitshares-hangout-2017-03-30-beyond-bitcoin-radioshow-raw-recording-for-impatients

934
General Discussion / Re: [Testnet-StressTest] March 15th - 3:00pm UTC
« on: March 26, 2017, 07:21:43 pm »
Thoughts on utilizing a BOINC project to distribute the load generating software required to push the tx/s to new heights? https://steemit.com/beyondbitcoin/@cm-steem/brainstorming-boinc-projects-006#@cm-steem/re-cm-steem-brainstorming-boinc-projects-006-20170326t013749374z

Mentioned the idea on beyondbitcoin #200 too: https://steemit.com/beyondbitcoin/@glitterfart/beyond-bitcoin-radioshow-2017-03-24-gridcoin-raw-recording-for-impatients

What I took away from that conversation is that BOINC would not be suitable for the BitShares testnet to spam the network for testing b/c BOINC projects are geared towards problems where longer term application of CPU resources is required, as opposed to the burst requirements of the testnet. Testing on the testnet is not a continuous, ongoing operation.

I'm not very knowledgeable about BOINC, just commenting on what I heard in the mumble last Friday.

What I meant was that a Bitshares testnet stress-test BOINC project would be unsuitable for Gridcoin whitelist status as the Gridcoin network focuses on projects with continuous work unit distribution, and the nature of stress-tests is bursty & far apart.

Such a BOINC project is entirely possible, you can distribute any kind of distributed computing application. I'd imagine that for this idea, you would distribute a docker container which contained python dependencies, the testnet stress-test python script, and the bitshares client.

Once running on an user's machine, it would need to create a testnet user account, then the project admin would need to send enough testnet BTS to each participating account, then the main stress-test script would begin bombarding testnet with transactions, so it's not as simple as just distributing the bitshares client and the python script.

With regards to rewarding participating users, you could add an BTS account field within the BOINC profile or within the project registration page, to which you could take into account the credit achieved by participating users during the stress-test phases & distribute an UIA proportionally for their completed work.

936
If you were able to exchange FIAT to <relevant_smartcoin> in stores or at an ATM, then we'd potentially see a massive surge in the use of the smartcoins, no? I'd prefer to use smartcoins to buy goods online instead of BTC because in the time between buying BTC and spending the BTC the value can change due to volatility (far less volatility w/ FIAT).

937
General Discussion / Re: Compuceeds and Compumatrix
« on: January 23, 2017, 08:22:45 pm »
Your forum registration is broken. Do you sign up somewhere else?

938
The poll wouldn't work for me, but I imagine that a large amount of the BTS communtiy is interested in the stealth/anonymity features being introduced to BitShares. There was that article that claimed that the feature is barely used in zcash, but that's because zcash is an ico pump and dump.

939
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 22, 2017, 03:36:52 am »
We should hold a theme creation challenge/contest, it's pretty much just picking 20 colours. Lesson learned - you need to provide translations to new themes in the dropdown menu.
BTS Web Wallet Dank edition, now with 200% airhorns. 420. Doritos.

941
Lock away the 1mil BTS in a smart contract, deduct x BTS for every missed block?

942
General Discussion / Re: plan for sidechain?
« on: January 20, 2017, 01:50:55 pm »
Gridcoin's interested in a sidechain! http://forum.blockchainbunker.com/d/5-which-blockchain-should-sidechain-first/9

There was once a quote of $100k to get the sidechain tech developed, is this a realistic quote & if a worker proposal was created would its development be possible? I'll vote for it! :)

Would sidechains make EBAs obsolete though? :/

943
Quick update regarding the 'GRIDCOIN' MPA - The Gridcoin price fluctuated, triggered a black swan state and the asset has been stuck in said state ever since: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22733.msg299091.html#msg299091

It has however opened the door to new developments by PC regarding MPA resiliency to black swan events. Once these new changes are in effect, the Gridcoin community will reactivate the market pegged asset, requiring more witnesses to produce the price feed.

Prior to the black swan event we only had 2 or 3 witnesses out of 25 (27?), whilst changing the witness count may be a dangerous idea the concept of vote weight degradation over time for witnesses and committee members is still sound.

What does everyone think?
I do think a UIA fits more in Gridcoin's situation, perhaps with a special owner/committee like the STEALTH asset (check https://cryptofresh.com/u/stealth-mgmt , the owner is a multi-sig account, automatically controlled by top 5 holders)
We've already got an EBA (OPEN.GRC), issuing an UIA would inflate the GRC coinsupply (unlikely to fly with the GRC network unless we burnt GRC before project-raining an GRC UIA).
We're waiting for the blackswan hardening features to be implemented within BTS early this year, when the changes are implemented we will revive the GRIDCOIN MPA even if it's risky.

This is off topic though, back to the main point - vote degradation!

People are talking about increasing the block rewards for witnesses to encourage more active/productive witnesses: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23702.0.html

Surely degrading votes over say 4-6 months would encourage witnesses to continuously campaign for their positions and open the door for new witnesses to potentially gain power?

Getting witnesses to add price feeds for the GRIDCOIN MPA was like pulling teeth  - witnesses should be far more active & inactivity should have consequences, even if their witness node is healthy.

I think vote degradation may be a problem if there isn't a ton of voter participation to begin with.  Also, I think @pc made a good argument against degradation earlier in the thread.

By the way, I wonder if witnesses have been reluctant to offer price feeds for Gridcoin MPA because they think MPA is the wrong way to go.  I tend to agree with that.  A cryptocuyrrency is not the best use case for an MPA, especially an MPA that will have difficult gaining liquidity.  Why not issue a UIA?  You could get rid of your blockchain and replace the coins with a committee-controlled UIA.  Then you could focus on maintaining/developing your BOINC software rather then futzing around with a blockchain, which has nothing to do with your core competency.   Anyway, just my 2 cents.
If there's not a ton of voter participation to begin with then surely DPOS is not an effective mechanism for voting witnesses into/out of power? Currently witnesses are voted in and unless they turn malicious/incompetent they never lose their position, thus competition stalls and witnesses contribute the minimum required of their role. By introducing vote degradation(over a long time say 6 months), witnesses would have to at least post an update once in a while to show they're still alive in the community. It'd revitalize the democratic aspect of DPOS.

Should it really be up to witnesses to make decisions that prevent alternative cryptocurrencies from utilizing the full features of bitshares? If it was like pulling teeth for GRC, will all other alternative cryptocurrencies face opposition from these individuals? Surely we want as many assets being traded on the DEX as possible, no? Had we never attempted the MPA, BTS would not be pursuing improvments to blackswan handling: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/216 This'd have been far worse if it had affected bitUSD.

I've mentioned in previous posts why we won't be pursuing an UIA. Gridcoin is a seperate community & project from BOINC, we do not contribute towards its development and by issuing an UIA for BOINC computation we would be introducing centralization where there is currently decentralization. There will certainly be BOINC UIAs issued in the future (project rain), but GRC will not be migrating to an UIA.

Edit: Relevant github issue: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/29

944
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 20, 2017, 09:51:34 am »
I hope to add in new drop-down menus to the right of 'Deposit/Withdraw', linking to the other web wallets (OpenLedger, FreedomLedger, BTSABC, etc) and to BOINC/BTS/Gridcoin community links. The *.JSX is a tad confusing though..
I think (but not sure) something similar to this should work:
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/blob/master/web/app/components/Layout/Header.jsx#L227
It can be used later somewhere in return (line 246).
Managed to add a drop down menu thanks to your suggestion:


945
General Discussion / Re: Gridcoin's BTS Web Wallet Customisations!
« on: January 19, 2017, 09:46:23 am »
I hope to add in new drop-down menus to the right of 'Deposit/Withdraw', linking to the other web wallets (OpenLedger, FreedomLedger, BTSABC, etc) and to BOINC/BTS/Gridcoin community links. The *.JSX is a tad confusing though..
I think (but not sure) something similar to this should work:
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/blob/master/web/app/components/Layout/Header.jsx#L227
It can be used later somewhere in return (line 246).
Cool, I'll try getting this to work this weekend. I also need to uplift the customizations to the latest BTS GUI release.

Edit: Merged in the latest bitshares ui changes :)

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68