Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Oh .. I would actually focus on selling bitUSD and bitGOLD and let me realize on there own that they can also buy bitBTC .. AND get a yield on it too!
It's (IMHO) worth more when your costumers realize the potentials themselves instead of giving them a list of things they can do ..
It's been there a while actually, but they're pulling the data from Bitsharesblocks and so their data got out of sync when I changed the API last week. Toast and I contacted Gliss about it and he got it back up a few days ago.I thought that Gliss was supposed to put BitUSD on the main page with Nubits. Any news on that?
litecoin and dogecoin (merge-mined) are the perfect target.
Attacking dogecoin almost seems like an even worse idea. Who would want to attack such a nice community? All they care about is tipping each other and making fun pictures of dogs.
Seriously, Bitshares should not be in the business of attacking other coins. Even if it works.
We can win due to a superior product, there is no need to be the bad guys and launch attacks on other coins networks.
Let us not be the one to initiate use of force. I thought that was what most of us agreed upon, but it looks like I was wrong.
At a min we need to make it easier to vote. I don't view voter apathy as a bad thing in all cases. It is too hard to figure out how to vote. The thumbs up thumbs down would be great if it worked. I don't like the fact that I must select 101 different people in order for my vote to be counted. Why can I go through and thumb up a single delegate and the gui takes and votes my stake. Or I select 10 or 20 delegates with a check mark system and click vote stake and be done?You don't have to pick up all 101 delegates in order for your vote to be counted. One delegate is minimum so your vote can be counted. System prefers if you vote for all 101 delegates, but that doesn't mean that you need to vote for all 101 delegate.
Think unity not division. If you can't see any division going on here in this thread then you haven't truly understood the danger of making ambiguous posts in the community.
I trust I3's technical skills and leadership in general, but not so much in PR and marketing. This doesn't help to strengthen my confidence.
I have the same feeling in this point with Thom.
It would be better if we can avoid ambiguous statements when we are trying to announce something important.
Ever think that accountants and lawyers demand I3 be careful about how much they say? Ever think that one wrong word could cause more trouble than leaving it ambiguous?
I am sure they want to tell us everything clearly.
QUESTION: If PTS price plummeted as for all intents and purposes it is useless right now, why hasn't the BTSX price plummeted equally? If there was a merger then wouldn't both be useless and worthless now and only BTS(when it's released, based on your holdings of both PTS and BTSX, be useful and valuable?There was no merger but share drop by BTSX.
