Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vegolino

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30
286
General Discussion / Re: drltc is joining the BitShares team
« on: October 21, 2014, 04:20:02 pm »
Congratulations drltc  :)

287
General Discussion / Re: IMPORTANT: BTS Merger (Poll)
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:47:36 pm »
 +5%

288
General Discussion / Re: The Significance of What We Are Doing...(Vote)
« on: October 21, 2014, 11:40:09 am »
Quote
From the day I read the first Invictus web pages....the ones with the knight and the windmill....I completely bought into the idea that some incredibly clever people cared about the principals I value and were going to use Satoshi's invention and their ingenuity to build technology and networks that would manifest Satoshi's dream.  I believe the dream was to forever alter the structure of humanity by providing a tool that resists corruption over time and enables our societies to completely reorganize our resources and priorities, unfettered by a corrupting influence.

What will this accomplish?  It's almost unimaginable.  Appropriate allocation of capital, preservation of finite resources, unlimited innovation, new levels of education, a breakdown of tribal societal structures, no more war......

I genuinely couldn't care less what allocation I get if Bitshares can move us even a small way towards that goal.  I trust BM to be as fair as possible.  I promise right now that I will not complain regardless of the final decision. I will not look back and analyse what might have been.  I feel honoured to be even the tiniest part this.  I want our children to grow up in peace and explore the universe.

What we build today in Bitshares could literally echo through eternity and for once, that echo might fill our progeny with pride and love.
Thanks Ben Mason for putting your thoughts in writing  :)  +5%

289
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 21, 2014, 10:35:18 am »
I thought that would necessarily be the case anyway.
I wonder it would not be practical for DNS = NOTE = VOTE = BTSX. Those others are assets within BTS.

The risk is simply having those on one chain.. one bug could rue them all.
Then the other issue is putting PTS/AGS into BTS or put that separate.
There is risk that one bug could rue them all, but don't forget if all developers are together than it is easier to fix the bug rather than if they are separate.

290
The mere  presence of this thread is proof that you know exactly that this share dilution proposal is a bad thing, and you just want to cover up that fact.

It is share dilution, so just call it what it is.
Once it is implemented and coinmarketcap doubles soon after it will not matter what we call it as all names will be good ones .
We will be calling it that thing that made us rich including pc who nearly sold his shares  :)

291
Quote
Quote from freemarket
The choice is yours:  Fear or Love
  +5%

292
Empirical1.1
Quote
However as I've said before my BitShares investment is primarily an investment in Bytemasters grand vision. BitAssets also have a short window of opportunity to take their shot at the world. So the sooner we get things resolved and push forward the better.
My thoughts exactly  +5%

293
General Discussion / Re: Gold 2.0 vs. Shares 2.0: Lets Talk Metaphors
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:11:20 pm »
This might be one for the stupid questions thread.

But since it's a DAC, anybody can come up with a dilution proposal right?
It doesn't necessarily have to be Invictus issuing new shares, as long as they get enough votes.
Yes

294
General Discussion / Re: Gold 2.0 vs. Shares 2.0: Lets Talk Metaphors
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:51:36 pm »
Clear and simple way to communicate things is a gift. Thank you MeTHoDx for using this gift and sharing it with forum users.

295
General Discussion / Re: Main reason of FUD from Chinese Community
« on: October 20, 2014, 11:28:44 am »
*************************** They are running a sale on bts and its probably going to be the last one we see for a long time. Buy low sell high
There is no need to use such a rude language on the forum.

296
Don't you guys have a board of your own? If you're going to post here try and put some English in.

If they're posting here it's because they feel their voices are not being heard there.
A lot of the stuff happens on the English forums even though China are currently the main market.
If they want to, they can post here in Chinese whenever they want imo.
  +5%

297
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 07:27:37 pm »
These are the kind of changes you don't make after a launch. It's way too much change for the market to handle and it's not the kind of change anyone wants. The market is speaking.

In my opinion if you want unity then network the DACs using technical means. Don't change the names, don't change the internal structures or centralize it. Allow all DACs to pay a fee to join this network of DACs and use that network as a sort of support network for all the DACs.

It is a company. 
It is competing in a ruthless Darwinian evolutionary environment. 
It must continuously adapt or die. 
Arguments against change are arguments against adapting. 
The dinosaurs already tried that.

:)
   +5% for wise Stan

298
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 06:56:58 pm »
Quote
Once Bytemaster & his trusted mates discovered the "secret sauce recipe" and realized how to gain orders of magnitude faster penetration into the market by exploiting certain opportunities that have recently appeared, it became clear that the opportunities had to be seized. 

By now people should know that what they are investing in is the products of a very agile team that will stay ahead of the competition chiefly because of that agility.  We make no apologies for playing to that strength.  Those that are able to HODL will be rewarded.  Those who can't will fall off at the hairpin turns.  We will always have people who have climbed on board for the wrong reasons and they are the ones who will eject during the high-G maneuvers.  Buy when they sell.

If you want slow and steady, invest in Coca Cola.  :)
  +5% +5%

299
General Discussion / Re: VOTE DAC Just Got More Interesting 2.0
« on: October 18, 2014, 12:07:02 pm »
1) BTSX hard cap of 2 billion is going to limit its growth potential.

Now I'm confused? It is up to shareholders to determine if BTSX has a "hard cap of 2 billion". If shareholders deem it necessary they can vote in delegates that support delusion, right?

From the "How much is a new user worth?" thread (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9603.0) it seems like +60% of the people are for delusion as long as there is a good plan. And many of the people who were against it change their minds and some even said it should be done if need be but only as a last resort.

So BTSX doesn't have a hard cap and doesn't have limited growth potential. Or at least I think it should be left up to shareholders to decide if it does.

Or have I missed something???
  +5%
If bytemaster think 2 billion cap is going to limit growth potential, than let's change it. If majority of shareholders wants to remove it than what is the problem?
 Please forgive me for any ignorance that I am not aware of regarding this issue.

300
There is absolutely no need for the new thread

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30