Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xiangxn

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: January 16, 2017, 03:36:03 am »
You can vote for my witness [xn-delegate], thanks.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23687.0.html

17
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: January 16, 2017, 03:34:01 am »
You can vote for my witness [xn-delegate], thanks.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23687.0.html

18
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] 1.6.59 - xn-delegate
« on: January 12, 2017, 03:03:07 am »
I get you're a developer... Why not open a worker proposal instead of witness?
The witness is not to make money, is to better participation.
Because the current worker is not well supervised.

What do you mean by not well supervised?

I voted for your witness.
I believe your witness has missed around 370 blocks in past 24 hours. Probably due to the high latency associated with being hosted in china.
Maybe your location is not suitable for hosting witness?

no... My witness last missed block at Three months ago,and VPS from Linode.

You are sure you see the xn-delegate?

19
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] 1.6.59 - xn-delegate
« on: January 11, 2017, 01:21:25 pm »
I get you're a developer... Why not open a worker proposal instead of witness?
The witness is not to make money, is to better participation.
Because the current worker is not well supervised.

20
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] 1.6.59 - xn-delegate
« on: January 11, 2017, 10:21:06 am »
既然是 UI ,来几张截图看看?
已经补发图片

21
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 你赞同增加出块奖励吗?
« on: January 11, 2017, 08:14:39 am »
 +5% +5% +5%
不光加块收入,还应该改变worker的发放流程,也要适当的加一些些交易费。

22
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] 1.6.59 - xn-delegate
« on: January 11, 2017, 03:13:50 am »
That's great! Can't wait to try it.
Completed 30%,
I think it should be very fast

23
Stakeholder Proposals / [Witness Proposal] 1.6.59 - xn-delegate
« on: January 10, 2017, 10:00:51 am »
我是一个程序员,已经从业15年;从PTS发布后开始关注区块链技术,在过去的时间里一直关注PTS、Bitshare1.0、Bitshare2.0、以及框架Graphene。

在目前各种区块技术对比后,发现Bitshare2.0以及Graphene框架是相当不错的,所以加大了在技术上的学习时间。

看到社区里很多人反对Worker,于是我已经开始免费的为Bitshares2.0做一个UI。这个UI,是针对入门用户,以操作简单为目的,主要实现交易和支付功能;这个项目的源码同步公开,以方便其他人学习研究。为更多的开发爱好者参与进来做出我自己的一点贡献。

源码地址:https://github.com/xiangxn/btsgo
钱包demo:https://coingo.club

另外,我会用我的专业来做好一个证人,相信我是认真负责的。

同时也希望大家为我的见证人投上一票:
见证人账号:xn-delegate
见证人 id:1.6.59
见证人服务器配置:Linode 4核,8G 内存

I am a programmer, has been practitioners for 15 years; from the PTS after the release of concern about the block chain technology, in the past time has been concerned about PTS, Bitshare1.0, Bitshare2.0, and framework Graphene.

In the current block technology comparison, found Bitshare2.0 and Graphene framework is quite good, so increase the technical learning time.

See a lot of people in the community against Worker, so I have started a free Bitshares2.0 UI. The UI is aimed at entry users, for the purpose of simple operation, the main realization of the transaction and payment functions; the project's source code simultaneously open to facilitate other people to study and research. For more development enthusiasts to participate in to make my own little contribution.

Source address: https://github.com/xiangxn/btsgo
wallet demo:https://coingo.club

I will use my professional to do a witness, I believe I am serious and responsible.

I also hope that you will vote for my witnesses:
Witness account: xn-delegate
Witnesses id: 1.6.59
Witness Server configuration: Linode 4 core, 8G memory

24
中文 (Chinese) / 关于bitshares系统承兑商的一些想法
« on: September 22, 2016, 02:29:28 am »
承兑商是去中心交易平台中最重要的一个环节,却没有在系统内得到监管。这让一个去中心的交易平台失去了翅膀。

    我一直在思考 bitshares 这么好项目为什么市值一跌再跌,在社区、QQ群里看到最多的就是UI问题、推广问题、庄的问题、开发问题等等;后来又发现还有提现问题,经过分析,发现人们在内盘交易完提现,第一不能是法币,第二只能通过承兑商或者其他中心交易平台提现,在内盘操作过的人无一不觉得很麻烦。

    数字币出生以来,已经出现过交易平台“被盗”不只一次,人们都相当痛恨这种事情,但为什么面对一个去中心化的交易平台,却不愿意去学习(UI太难),没有去尝试(提现麻烦)而且最终还是要到中心交易平台提现,所以就没有这种必要了。“巨蟹”,玩bts的再了解不过,他们做出了承兑商,为内盘交易的充提做出了巨大的贡献。但是没有玩过bts的同学就没办法知道了,一定就会怀疑承兑能力,甚至怀疑承兑跑路。虽然,目前没有任何办法可以完全解决这个“信任”问题,但是我在深入的学习了bts系统后发现系统本身的“公司管理机制”已经相当不错了,这也是在解决“信任”问题,另外就是投票的“理事会”,“见证人”,这都是在区块上达成的共识。那么我就在想为什么不把承兑商也作为系统的一员呢?这样bts系统就成功的有了一个简单的闭环。那么系统内将有“理事会”、“见证人”、“承兑商”,理事会员作为执行者,承兑商为公司的“出纳”(也许这个比方不太准确)。

    下面将“承兑商”角色并入系统的具体想法描述一下,希望有兴趣的同学一起讨论研究:

    1、承兑商账户类似于“见证人”需要终身会员后再创建。

    2、创建承兑商时需要锁定一定数量的“准备金”(下限可以像其他系统参数一样投票决定,以bts计算)。

    3、承兑商可以像见证人一样是有限个数在运行,通过投票和“准备金”两个数据排名,前N位“承兑商”运行。

    4、承兑商的资产可提余额全网公开(系统账户本来资产数量就是公开的)。

    5、修改系统代码时,固化基本数字币(btc)充提功能以及一到两个法币充提接口(法币提现接口是否合法?)。

    6、其他第三方数字币提现可按btc提现功能自行开发(出于安全不建议自行开发,可由worker完成)。

    7、承兑商需要自己配置节点完成服务提供(类似于API服务器,如果技术上可以实现直接账户提现,则更好,因为可以保护承兑商的服务器,提现通过账户之间的数据沟通完成操作,我想到的最简单的数据沟通就是交易的memo,也可以独立开发一种操作类型)。

    以上为我个人想到的并入方案,肯定有不少问题,所以希望大家有兴趣的参与讨论,希望最终成型。

    另外如果英文好的,欢迎翻译!!!欢迎转载!!!

     谢谢大家花时间看到最后一个字

25
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares 3.0 - It Is Time
« on: June 28, 2016, 01:13:51 am »
Why not use BTS to IPO?
Then assets within the disc tokens for IPO
I agree, any IPO should be done on the BTS 2.0 network. The initial distribution of Bitshares 3.0 could be derived from that distribution of BTS 3.0 tokens issued on Bit shares 2.0

Worst case scenario, it provides short term buy pressure to the BTS token. Best case scenario... BTS 3.0 takes off like Ethereum, and shareholders are content with the equity reduction based on evaluation increase of the BTS 3.0 token.

If you antagonists are correct, Bitshares 2.0 will beat out Bitshares 3.0 in the market. Otherwise, Bit shares 3.0 will beat out Bit shares 2.0, and you may not get such a pleasant share drop. Someone will eventually come along and do what I am proposing.

Any issuance will accelerate BTS death!!!
Now, The only thing to do is change the source of worker's wages

26
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares 3.0 - It Is Time
« on: June 27, 2016, 05:35:27 am »
Why not use BTS to IPO?
Then assets within the disc tokens for IPO

27
加我一个见证xn-delegate,本人,投身开发14年,运行的见证节点在阿里云120.27.121.190,希望各位土豪给上一票,把bts的搞下去。
我的口号是:只要不归0,我节点就不停! :)

28
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 自平台的测试链测试发布
« on: May 03, 2016, 03:08:42 am »
 +5%支持到底 +5%

29
现在的手续费是相当不合理的,虽然换算成rmb不算多,但对于数字币的一个亮点,就是支付快捷,手续少,可是这一点没有体现,我不知道为什么会这么高,现在你支付1bts给朋友,你要花6毛rmb,这就限制了人来使用。现在相信bts的人已经不多了,就算网络不收费,我也相信有人出来为网络出服务器。就像我,只在测试网络上跑见正人,多次拉票未果,但是我的服务器一直没有停过。只要使用的人多了,那怕你一次手续费是一bts也是取之不尽的。现在都讲运营模式,懂事们,你们怎么想的?

30
I have no clue what it does :(
This is a trade information on a blockchain of data guessing game.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5