166
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
167
General Discussion / INFOGRAPHIC - Graphene Ecosystem
« on: October 02, 2015, 09:39:26 am »
Let's brainstorm about what players and roles exist in the graphene ecosystem. At the moment I have:
- The respective graphene blockchain (Bitshares, Identabit, Muse)
- Cryptonomex (once as a backend software software provider and once as a front end software provider / implementation partner / technical referral partner)
- The industry specific entrepreneurs (follow may vote, open ledger etc.)
- Affiliate marketers
- Users
- The respective graphene blockchain (Bitshares, Identabit, Muse)
- Cryptonomex (once as a backend software software provider and once as a front end software provider / implementation partner / technical referral partner)
- The industry specific entrepreneurs (follow may vote, open ledger etc.)
- Affiliate marketers
- Users
168
General Discussion / Re: Metrics to distinguish blockchain development companies
« on: October 02, 2015, 09:23:52 am »
Thanks a lot everyone!! Updated. Check it out!
169
General Discussion / Metrics to distinguish blockchain development companies
« on: October 01, 2015, 07:22:11 pm »
Please brainstorm with me...
What are the metrics that distinguish the various blockchain / distributed ledger tech stacks:
At the moment I have:
Development support for public / private blockchains
Development support for regulatory compliant blockchains
Open Source
IP protected
Scalability (transaction throughput, settlement speed, cost efficiency)
Scope: Amount of applications possible (without meta protocols)
Governance and self funding ability for public blockchains
Virality potential
External developer tools and documentation as of today
Please don't be afraid to suggest metrics that let CNX look bad! Being realistic creates trust.
In a table it looks like this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxMu13EYH1fB0HWYyagWD1IlXhmy4SnRXJjiCyHs3AM/edit?usp=sharing
It will be part of a pitch we are creating to be used in China..
What are the metrics that distinguish the various blockchain / distributed ledger tech stacks:
At the moment I have:
Development support for public / private blockchains
Development support for regulatory compliant blockchains
Open Source
IP protected
Scalability (transaction throughput, settlement speed, cost efficiency)
Scope: Amount of applications possible (without meta protocols)
Governance and self funding ability for public blockchains
Virality potential
External developer tools and documentation as of today
Please don't be afraid to suggest metrics that let CNX look bad! Being realistic creates trust.
In a table it looks like this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxMu13EYH1fB0HWYyagWD1IlXhmy4SnRXJjiCyHs3AM/edit?usp=sharing
It will be part of a pitch we are creating to be used in China..
170
General Discussion / Re: Anyone reach out to David Rutter of R3 - Big Banks using blockchain technology
« on: October 01, 2015, 11:46:01 am »I didnt doubt that. The timing and the framing (in what social context that inquiry is made) could be better though.Such a contact can only be done once if it comes accross that the poerson contacting them is doing so in some official CNX capacity...
...... in general there is absolutely no rush to contact them. They don't have own software and it will take them years to decide on something. All they do is drum up attention by having big names attributed to their brand... My point is that we will probably be in a better position to make the contact once graphene has proven itself and CNX has received some more positive attention.
But some social media buzz directed towards them
I think murderistic is the perfect person, hes been good with other leads so far.
171
General Discussion / Re: Anyone reach out to David Rutter of R3 - Big Banks using blockchain technology
« on: September 30, 2015, 10:28:11 pm »
Such a contact can only be done once if it comes accross that the poerson contacting them is doing so in some official CNX capacity...
...... in general there is absolutely no rush to contact them. They don't have own software and it will take them years to decide on something. All they do is drum up attention by having big names attributed to their brand... My point is that we will probably be in a better position to make the contact once graphene has proven itself and CNX has received some more positive attention.
But some social media buzz directed towards them
...... in general there is absolutely no rush to contact them. They don't have own software and it will take them years to decide on something. All they do is drum up attention by having big names attributed to their brand... My point is that we will probably be in a better position to make the contact once graphene has proven itself and CNX has received some more positive attention.
But some social media buzz directed towards them
172
General Discussion / Re: Anyone reach out to David Rutter of R3 - Big Banks using blockchain technology
« on: September 30, 2015, 06:44:45 pm »
We arent investors in any legal sense. If someone approaches anyone it should be made clear what role the person has (bought a counterparty free token in a fundraising campaign and am a community member).
173
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: September 30, 2015, 04:20:50 pm »Ok thanks!What is the "precision" parameter on bitsharesblocks (user issued assets > asset info) about?
How many "satoshis" of the asset make up one unit. For example, BTS has precision 10^5 and BTC has precision 10^8.
174
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: September 30, 2015, 03:07:15 pm »
What is the "precision" parameter on bitsharesblocks (user issued assets > asset info) about?
175
Meta / Re: World Leaders Meet at United Nations; Control of the Internet on the Table !!!
« on: September 28, 2015, 09:55:53 pm »All the more reason why political security needs to be figured out.i am really happy that you give credit to this. How things are preceived matters a lot.
176
Openledger / Re: CT - World’s First Decentralized Fintech Exchange OpenLedger Launches
« on: September 27, 2015, 12:42:38 pm »
Any chance to get the openledger dot com domain?
177
General Discussion / Re: Predict what will be the price of ETH and BTS the first time that BTS passes ETH
« on: September 26, 2015, 07:46:42 pm »
37m
178
Random Discussion / Re: How can BitShares & Comnunity change lifes?
« on: September 26, 2015, 05:07:56 pm »
Cried over it 
179
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: September 26, 2015, 04:10:29 pm »
Stupid question: Will the font and the color scheme still change?
I dont dislike the font in general just the parts where everything is capitalized under Explorer > Blocks
I dont dislike the font in general just the parts where everything is capitalized under Explorer > Blocks
180
General Discussion / Re: What in theory need to be done, to create new pegged bitAsset, like bitPLN?
« on: September 26, 2015, 11:58:55 am »The motivation to short a bitasset into existence that I can see is the speculation that bts goes up if there is big demand for bitassets because it means the system and bts is being used.
2.) What is the potential return for a whale or Bank to lock away the first million BTS to start a new market? What do they gain?
Any other incentives?
Could this become a problem in a general bear market where the bear market effect on the bts price is bigger than the increasing demand for bitassets?
