Quote from: delulo on January 27, 2014, 01:04:33 pm

Quote from: AdamBLevine on January 27, 2014, 07:48:15 am

Quote from: currencydebt on January 27, 2014, 03:57:56 am

Quote from: AdamBLevine on January 26, 2014, 09:13:47 pm

Ambitious title, to be honest with you I get most of my information by talking to people all the time, and reading lots of forums.   I am paying attention to Bitshares, Mastercoin, NXT, Ethereum, Emunie (to a lesser extent).   I am very interested in open transactions.

Adam, any that are off the radar or on the horizon?

Q1 is about Metacoins, Q3 will be about the coins built on top of metacoins, and I wouldnt be suprised if it was really Q2.

Honestly this is the bleeding edge right here

What do you mean by Q and what by metacoins?
Q1 is about Metacoins, Q3 will be about the coins built on top of metacoins, and I wouldnt be suprised if it was really Q2.

By tools do you mean financial instruments that are possible with Bitshares/Mastercoin or 3rd Parties building on top /based on Mastercoin/Bitshares?

Q1 being from January 2014 to March 2014
Q2 being from April 2014 to June 2014
Q3 being from July 2014 to September 2014
Q4 being from October 2014 to December 2014

Metacoins being something like Mastercoin and then the coins/tools built on top of these metacoins.

Quote from: delulo on January 26, 2014, 11:21:26 pm

They keep them.
See OP:

Quote

"What happens to all the donations?"

100% of the proceeds go to growing the crypto-equity industry. Zero percent  will be retained as profits Invictus.

That means these BTSX, together with Donated PTS/BTC, will be allocated in an asset pool that 3i promises to grow DAC industry, but not as company profit. Am I intepreting correct?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

"What happens to all the donations?"

100% of the proceeds go to growing the crypto-equity industry. Zero percent  will be retained as profits Invictus.

Quote from: delulo on January 23, 2014, 09:13:17 pm

Quote from: sumantso on January 23, 2014, 08:38:07 pm

Quote from: delulo on January 23, 2014, 07:40:26 pm

Agree with regard to invictus and bytemaster! Good distribution is key to success in DACs and this is only possible if the team focuses on the long term and not the quick bug which in the end is way more profitable anyway (exponential growth...).

Edit:
And with respect to AGS/PTS value something has to be considered that has not been mentioned yet that much. With PTS you are holding a tradable asset that can rise in value in itself which is not the case for AGS. Maybe (what do you think?) bitshares has more potential to grow in price compared to PTS but by buying AGS one is giving up an asset with value in itself. With PTS you have both Bitshares and PTS. With AGS you only have Bitshares after the release... The only way people can get in with future invictus DACS is by PTS which will make it rise lots....
What do you think?

You will get a portion in all future I3 or I3 supported DACs through AGS. As far as I3 is concerned, AGS and PTS are on the same footing.

...you are not contradicting what I said above

I read closely and yes, you are right.

So it all boils down to how big BitsharesX is going to become. If you believe that its gonna be huge it makes sense to maximize the earned amount. I am some 2:1 in PTS/AGS and will probably end up as 1:1.