Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bench

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 23
16
General Discussion / Re: bitsharescan.com（Bitshares Blockchain Explorer feedback）
« on: August 05, 2020, 11:26:53 am »
Quote from: Thul3 on August 05, 2020, 06:15:28 am
Quote
dear all,the yesterdays removal of votes from cnvote supporting openledger-dc witness makes it impossible to cover costs in near future of support of well known nodes like nuremberg and explorer bitsharescan.they will close as the month server fee expire unless its voted back

Why does Open Ledger not open source bitsharescan, when he is not able to cover the server costs ?

17
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] XBTSIO-WALLET
« on: July 24, 2020, 11:04:16 pm »
Bitshares-vision proxy supports XBTSIO-WALLET Witness.

18
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [POLL]BAIP8 : Reduce price threshold by 30% for bitcny
« on: June 21, 2020, 12:56:21 pm »
Support!

19
Stakeholder Proposals / OIP1: Asset Feature - MLP2 (Market Liquidity Pool 2)
« on: June 21, 2020, 12:42:34 pm »
Liquidity is a big problem on the BitShares DEX, because there is no way to lend assets for market making.

Bancor and Uniswap got recently a protocol update. More users are using their service for lending and asset swaps.

The Onest Blockchain is a proof of concept for BitShares and BTS holder, to bring new innovations into the space. Which means an OIP can be freely exchanged for a BSIP and vice versa.

Abstract
  • MLP2 is an asset lending feature, to provide liquidity for asset exchanges at the current price level
  • Simplified version of the Bancor Protocol without connector weight
  • Stepless liquidity with no order book for any asset pair
  • Blockchain as borrower and liquidity provider
  • ONS as central node and base currency
  • Market fees are shared to asset lender and blockchain

What is new in MLP2?
  • One asset deposit/withdraw to/from MLP2
  • Non-core token liquidity pairs
  • No orderbook integration

Flow Chart


Soruces:
https://github.com/Onest-io/OIPS/issues/2
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29651.0
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/213

20
General Discussion / Re: bitsharescan.com（Bitshares Blockchain Explorer feedback）
« on: June 11, 2020, 04:53:29 pm »
HONEST.Assets are not an UIA, but a MPA, please correct.

21
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« on: June 07, 2020, 12:19:02 am »
Quote from: Thul3 on June 06, 2020, 04:08:41 pm
Your proposal is not valid for a BAIP voting

This and the destruction BSIP has already a higher voting power:

22
General Discussion / Re: What happened to Telegram?
« on: June 06, 2020, 09:19:04 pm »
Quote from: EuropaSH on June 06, 2020, 09:10:32 pm
links to channels?

#btstalk:matrix.org
#agorise:matrix.org
#Onest:matrix.org

23
General Discussion / Re: What happened to Telegram?
« on: June 06, 2020, 09:07:42 pm »
We have created backup channels on the matrix network.

https://matrix.org/

24
General Discussion / Re: MARKET FEE SHARING AND BSIP 86
« on: June 06, 2020, 12:08:10 pm »
The implementation of BSIP86 is wrong, because it taxes the asset owner and involves the committee.

A better approach is this:
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/262

25
General Discussion / Re: WARNING: HONEST.Assets Are High Risk MPA Assets
« on: May 28, 2020, 11:11:00 am »
Do your own research, before posting any FUD.

Headline should be HONEST.Assets are the biggest opportunity, since the invention of bitAssets. 

One price feeder is atm offline, should be back in a few hours.

The rest got already answered by @chigbolu.


Compare this with bitAssets!

26
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Bitshares UI, 2020 (6 months)
« on: May 25, 2020, 11:23:06 pm »
Quote from: Thul3 on May 25, 2020, 10:50:02 pm
What are currently the most urgent updates bitshares UI need ?

I would say bug fixes, auto reconnect and UX refinements.

27
General Discussion / Re: BTS-DEX economic model(updated MM contest rule)
« on: May 25, 2020, 01:28:42 pm »
Quote from: bitcrab on May 24, 2020, 02:24:15 am
it's easy to call bitCNY and bitUSD scamcoin, it's difficult to make BTS grow up and resume bitCNY and bitUSD.

Yes, it is very easy to say:
- because borrower did not use the chance to pay their debt back, when bitUSD/bitCNY has a huge discount.
- because market fees where not used to finance the reserve pool or to support development.
- because my suggestion to lower feed price threshold every day by 0.5%, is still not implemented.
- because we have with HONEST.Assets a working alternative.

28
General Discussion / Re: BTS-DEX economic model(updated MM contest rule)
« on: May 22, 2020, 12:40:59 pm »
Quote from: bitcrab on May 20, 2020, 09:24:12 am
2.BTS/bitAssets group, Base Reward 3KBTS, Top Reward 20KBTS, and Buy-Sell Reward Ratio 10:0
Why should the network reward the borrower of a scam coin ? Something is here completely wrong.

29
General Discussion / Re: how about slowly lowering the bitUSD and bitCNY feed price threshold?
« on: May 18, 2020, 01:40:24 pm »
Quote from: binggo on May 18, 2020, 04:40:44 am
The holders of bitasset? en, nobody care, let the holders of bitasset go to die!

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32035.0

30
General Discussion / Re: how about slowly lowering the bitUSD and bitCNY feed price threshold?
« on: May 18, 2020, 02:04:14 am »
Quote from: bitcrab on May 14, 2020, 05:09:11 am
thoughts?
Lowering price feed threshold every day by 0.5%. 

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 23

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 23 queries.