Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bench

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 23
61
General Discussion / Re: Cleaned out!
« on: January 02, 2020, 01:04:18 am »
Problem is solved in UI, but bitshares.org still links to an insecure client version:

BitShares UI (GitHub Release April 26, 2019)

62
General Discussion / Re: BSIP reorganization?
« on: December 27, 2019, 12:32:38 pm »
Quote from: abit on December 27, 2019, 12:16:51 pm
IMO we need 77, 81 and 85. Please help push them.

yes, but the biggest BTS account holder bit2020bts doesn't even vote.

63
General Discussion / Re: A thread on openledger
« on: December 23, 2019, 01:41:27 am »
The new fee schedule is just another punch in the customer's face. The minimum withdraw amount exclude most OPEN.asset holder. The complete opposite from open.

64
General Discussion / Re: Don't support BSIP62: Close Margin Position #211
« on: December 20, 2019, 12:19:51 am »
When he/she closes the position with a high discount the premium rises, but the price feed is not dependent on the bitAsset market.

Closing margin position needs a market fee.

65
General Discussion / Re: If biteur have set the new feed price rule BAIP2?
« on: December 20, 2019, 12:08:58 am »
bitEUR creater and user have no interest to get fucked up like bitUSD/bitCNY.

66
General Discussion / Re: If biteur have set the new feed price rule BAIP2?
« on: December 18, 2019, 04:23:48 pm »
I don't think so and this is good!

67
General Discussion / Re: Dear BTS... BSIPs that should be active...
« on: December 14, 2019, 06:34:44 pm »
I agree, we have here a good overview of BSIPs:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=31838.0

68
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] BitShares Core Team Worker Proposal from Graphene Lab
« on: December 12, 2019, 02:59:23 am »
 +5% Full support!

69
General Discussion / Re: [Market Making Contest Announcement] Adding ETH and EOS
« on: December 12, 2019, 02:51:24 am »
Quote from: Thul3 on December 11, 2019, 07:36:54 am
Whats the goal of adding these 2 pairs ?

I disagree adding now these 2 pairs instead of bitcny.

In the past days bitshares proofed to work great when market was going down and was one of the better performing coins in a downtrend HOWEVER it is having difficilties when moving up.
The issue is when the market is moving down it is being catched as supposed from the BTC/BTS USDT/BTS market but has no buy support when market is moving up.

Adding Bitcny/ BTC-USDT would be the needed support to also move quicker up in an uptrend and would release the pressure of current oversupply of bitcny

Agree here, market making to restore the peg on bitCNY/BTC and bitCNY/USDT is needed.

70
General Discussion / Re: Many Level Arbitrage bot between DEX and CEX (offer for community )
« on: December 10, 2019, 05:00:34 pm »
Why reinvent the wheel ?

Why do you offer it now and not, when DEXBot announced the work on arbitrage?

71
General Discussion / Re: BSIP reorganization?
« on: December 09, 2019, 03:20:18 am »
@bitcrab:
Good overview, I agree on the classification. BSIP70 is tricky, but should also generate some market flow.
Maybe we should implement other lending options first?

I want to add some BSIPs:

Class A:
- BSIP72: Tanks and Taps -> free integration
- BSIP77: Require Higher CR When Creating/Adjusting Debt Positions -> less bad debt and less margin calls
- BSIP78: Asset Feature - MLP (Market Liquidity Pool) -> shares market fees to network

Class B:
- BSIP75: Asset Owner Defines MCR and MSSR Values

72
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: bitshares-vision
« on: December 02, 2019, 08:56:48 pm »
Why have
bsip72 - Tanks and Taps: Smart Contract Asset Handling
and
bsip64 - Optional HTLC preimage length and hashes (needed for native coin integration)
so low voting weight ?

73
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Proposal] Setting market fee sharing for bitCNY, bitUSD and bitEUR
« on: November 29, 2019, 01:12:30 am »
Quote from: bitcrab on November 28, 2019, 10:48:24 am
Thoughts?

I am against increasing market fees, but until BitShares has enough income sources, this is a good short term fix.

74
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP2:Reform of loopholes in feed price mechanism
« on: November 18, 2019, 11:18:38 pm »
Quote from: cn-vote on November 12, 2019, 09:07:18 am
I mean this BAIP has been voting, so there should be no changes.
You started voting before addressing problems on BAIP2. You are damaging the collateral value, because BSIP2 does deactivate margin calls in a downtrend.
You did also not comment on my BAIP3, which means no interest for the real solution.

Quote from: liondani on November 17, 2019, 01:48:01 pm
I think also we should vote for it until we figure out something better (obviously not a perfect solution).
obviously not a solution, but BAIP3 is one

Quote from: liondani on November 17, 2019, 01:48:01 pm
BUT no reason to stay any longer with the current static price feed threshold!
BAIP2 does not remove price feed threshold

75
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP2:Reform of loopholes in feed price mechanism
« on: November 11, 2019, 03:58:42 pm »
Quote from: cn-vote on November 09, 2019, 04:34:30 pm
If you think your solution is more effective, I suggest you open a new BAIP.

He is trying to help you with your BAIP. 

You are rejecting help, ignore facts and attack people with other opinions.

This is a good strategy for communication and writing a proposal ?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 23

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 23 queries.