Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - alt

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 189
31
中比刷单没什么问题,不是针对BTS,CEX有这个需求。别人都刷单BTS不刷单,到时候每天成交量排名一千开外更没人看得上了。
有问题的是见证人,要改的是拿成交量算价格权重的策略。

我建议所有见证人彻底将ZB从喂价权重中彻底剔除,什么时候ZB不恶性的刷单,什么时候恢复权重。

32
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 03, 2019, 06:36:19 am »
unvoted delegate-zhaomu and magicwallet.witness

didn't get any response.
unvoted for verbatech2 and witness.yao.
will wait others response for another 24 hours.

33
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 01, 2019, 01:11:36 pm »
看了下这个平台就是FIAT USD,USDT和美元汇率就是1.0对吗?
可以认为人民币通过BTC交易换美元导致美元溢价了2.2个点,这样是可以解释内盘美元比人民币溢价2.2个点

但是我当时是按美元计价得到内盘美元喂价低了超过2个点,人民币喂价差不多。
你看看bingo在我后面几分钟的截图,人民币计价 0.4728,按1美元7.05算是0.067美元。
有没有可能你们的脚本汇率转换逻辑有问题,把0.067美元的BTS按 6.9 转成人民币喂价 0.4627人民币,再按 7.05的汇率算成 0.0656美元了?
所以当时的实际情况是人民币和美元喂价都低了超过2个点。

@alt

为什么CNY:USD交易价格在7以上,而不是“官方”规定的6.9?因为“官方”汇率是被操纵的。而加密货币交易市场是自由的。

我的上次喂价:
Kraken BTC 报价 8550 美金
Bittrex BTC 报价 8549 美金
ZB BTC  报价 60241 RMB
AEX BTC 报价 60284 RMB

综合结果:
人民币:美金 约等于 7.05

最新报价截图


60300, 60202 / 8582, 8570 ~= 7.015, 7.036

34
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: June 01, 2019, 08:20:38 am »
didn't get any response.
unvoted for verbatech2 and witness.yao.
will wait others response for another 24 hours.

USD/BTS price is 0.0658, while CNY/BTS price is 0.464,
means bitCNY/bitUSD rate is 7.05, while the fiat rate of CNY/USD is 6.9

I will unvote those witness who give feed price under 0.0658 if can't get a reasonable explain.


35
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 30, 2019, 11:54:16 pm »
you just need to explain how your price is reasonable.
do you think the price feed is important for smart asset?
did you do the research of how to provide a reasoanble price?
you witnesses got a good paid from blockchain, you need to do some serious research in return.
you witnesses are the guys who do a bad job, and now you said you are tired to hear the complaining.

I am so tired in complaining what the current witnesses have done.

I am so tired of your complaints as well.

Why not complain that gdex witness only provides 2 feeds? Why complain when witness doesn't meet >your< standards, when no standards are set? My feed as of right now is 2.1% off for CNY.

With no standard of measurement, you're complaints are meaningless. Besides, I am only 1 out of 21 witnesses, don't you understand how the price is set? 2.1% skews the median how much?

Your complaint is baseless. Better, you target witness that don't do the rest of their duties well, rather than complain about the few who don't always provide the feed the way you want it.

36
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 30, 2019, 10:10:38 pm »
USD/BTS price is 0.0658, while CNY/BTS price is 0.464,
means bitCNY/bitUSD rate is 7.05, while the fiat rate of CNY/USD is 6.9

I will unvote those witness who give feed price under 0.0658 if can't get a reasonable explain.

37
for the vote of committee, we have the same situations.
there are only 6 committee got more than 400M support without BEOS's support.
so make sure vote for no more than 11 committee, to avoid BEOS vote in 7 self account as committee.
for now they have voted in 2 account as committee without any others support.

38
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 喂价规则讨论贴
« on: May 29, 2019, 08:07:08 am »
刷成交单没什么门槛,谁都可以做。
刷交易量对平台自己来说也是0成本。
这种垃圾数据为什么几年来一直被某些见证人作为喂价的主要依据?用深度数据很难吗?
一说他们喂价垃圾还老是理直气壮的说XX交易所刷单了,XX交易所API故障了。
白拿了几年的工资,养了一堆废物
帮我投票,让我上位,ioex
你做了啥?
现在还没做什么,目前只搭好了主网节点、测试网节点,做了喂价策略和脚本准备。现在在学习前端技术,以后想做一个客户端。
什么都没做就来要钱?人傻钱多速来

39
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 喂价规则讨论贴
« on: May 29, 2019, 06:39:22 am »
刷成交单没什么门槛,谁都可以做。
刷交易量对平台自己来说也是0成本。
这种垃圾数据为什么几年来一直被某些见证人作为喂价的主要依据?用深度数据很难吗?
一说他们喂价垃圾还老是理直气壮的说XX交易所刷单了,XX交易所API故障了。
白拿了几年的工资,养了一堆废物
帮我投票,让我上位,ioex
你做了啥?

40
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 喂价规则讨论贴
« on: May 29, 2019, 04:45:00 am »
刷成交单没什么门槛,谁都可以做。
刷交易量对平台自己来说也是0成本。
这种垃圾数据为什么几年来一直被某些见证人作为喂价的主要依据?用深度数据很难吗?
一说他们喂价垃圾还老是理直气壮的说XX交易所刷单了,XX交易所API故障了。
白拿了几年的工资,养了一堆废物

41
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 21, 2019, 10:48:45 am »
忽悠傻子的,这个400万,我那个得值1000万
我没用过他们的机器人,一年400万?这是来圈钱的
老外的思维方式跟国人不一样,他们不是简单的做个交易机器人,他们的软件要比你原来那个复杂的多,下图是dexbot体系结构图:
另外把你的策略分享一下呗^_^
我的早就全部开源了,策略很简单,计算一个合理的市场价格,再设置个溢价就可以了。
没有精力维护,如果我做会按下面的思路做:
1. 把 core 里面的一个数据库插件修改下,用这个插件生成需要的数据库,用流行的通用数据库比如 mongodb,数据内容包括 order, 成交记录,帐号 balance 等等。
2. 用 web 开发,比如 nodejs 设计交互界面,主要是给用户看行情,分析机器人指标,调参数。
3. 机器人后端用 python 等语言设计,用户可以在 vps 上运行这个机器人后端,保证程序的稳定性。
4. 除了 web 交互,还可以增加原生手机 app 形式交互。web 和 app 中也都可以增加一个可选的机器人运行环境,对机器人稳定性没要求可以直接开着浏览器或者app跑机器人。

42
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 21, 2019, 08:54:55 am »
忽悠傻子的,这个400万,我那个得值1000万
我没用过他们的机器人,一年400万?这是来圈钱的
老外的思维方式跟国人不一样,他们不是简单的做个交易机器人,他们的软件要比你原来那个复杂的多,下图是dexbot体系结构图:

43
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares at the cross roads
« on: May 20, 2019, 11:32:58 pm »
BEOS is not "robbing" anything or anyone. Participating BTS shareholders are voluntarily giving their voting power to BEOS so that BEOS is enabled to integrate with bitshares. This will open up bitshares to the larger EOS community and bring value to both bitshares and BEOS.
what's your meanning about "they need voting power to enabled to integrate with bitshares"?
will this not be approved by other bitshares holders?
did this include vote in dead witness?
did this include vote in nobody known's commiittee?
did this include vote out others who didn't show loyal to stan?
All bull shit.
and this is why BEOS and the peoples who supportted BEOS's bull shit will lost my support.

Basically to put in a WP to integrate BEOS with BTS. Yes it will have to be approved by the BTS community.

We are voting in many witnesses that have shown interest or previous community witnesses that may be interested in coming back to BTS. We have had several good discussions with BP's as of late and hope to use our votes to further decentralize the witness structure.

What nobody knowns? We all know that the evangelist account is my committee account and godfather is stans. Other members of the community have different accounts for witness/bp/committee versus their personal accounts. No secret and not unknown.

Last - many people being voted for are not loyal to stan, some are eben outright HOSTILE to Stan, myself and BEOS - yet we continue to vote for them. So that negates that premise.

could you point out who said stan is the godfather of bts?
could you point out where is the commiittee application thread of godfather and evangelist?
and yes, I know many people being voted for are not loyal to stan, we known many dead witness be voted in by stan, sure dead account can't loyal to stan.
and can you tell me who is delegate.freedom, could you point out even one post of this account? could you explain why this nobody by supported instead of some guys from like openleger, bts.ai, bts++?
and can you point out any input from beos about the poll, for example: why they didn't support reduce mssr to 1.01, and after one day they change to support?
As I know, stan said anybody didn't give him BTS means didn't support beos, and didn't worth his support. this diffinitely means beos is agains the main bitshares community.

44
edited down to 21
very good, seems your change decrease the witness number to 21, although beos have vote for 26 witness.

45
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 20, 2019, 09:04:31 pm »
我没用过他们的机器人,一年400万?这是来圈钱的

发起投票:投票支持dexbot
2.  理由:dexbot团队一直为提高bitshares流动性而努力,值得投票支持。
3.  方式:由教授发起,同意的批准,不同意的不用做任何操作

请慎重考虑后再投票:
1. 这个机器人不容易用问题也多,比以前BTSBOT差很多 (可以去问问社区由多少人用这个机器人,也可以去问问ALT对这个机器人的使用感)
2. 半年需要2百万人名币,1年就是4百万了。
3. 没有提供公开明细。
4. 他们的多签账号都是相关利益者,没有类似BBF或者理事会成员进行监督。

虽然比特股需要机器人提供流动性,但是这个成本太高了,而且还不好用的。

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 189