16
MemoryCoin / Re: MMC Pools Tool
« on: January 03, 2014, 03:32:43 pm »seems legit!
would you consider to make it open-source?
It's a VB application, why not?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: 1 [2]
It's a VB application, why not?
17
MemoryCoin / Re: MMC Pools Tool
« on: January 03, 2014, 03:31:14 pm »interesting. it is necessary to add support for multiple wallets.
You just can copy paste any wallets you wants, you mean to add more wallets index fields?
18
MemoryCoin / MMC Pools Tool
« on: January 03, 2014, 03:03:45 pm »
I'm using my own windows application to add statistics and analysis to pools data, it works with 1gh pool as well as MMCpool.
It is in beta but if someone interessed I can upload the binary.
Please add your request, I can add features if it is necessary.
Fell free to support me : MFoyh3HxkoVDkUys5Eu7zHb99dU1Bxems8
It is in beta but if someone interessed I can upload the binary.
Please add your request, I can add features if it is necessary.
Fell free to support me : MFoyh3HxkoVDkUys5Eu7zHb99dU1Bxems8
19
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« on: January 03, 2014, 10:36:10 am »Hey,
I've been searching for cloud mining servers and found few of these -Quote- Dell PowerEdge R200
- Intel Xeon QuadCore X3320 2,4 GhzQuoteQuad-Core E3-1220 3.1GHz Sandy Bridge XeonQuoteProcessor: Intel Xeon E5504 2Ghz QuadQuoteIntel Xeon X3450 4 x 2.66 + HTQuoteIntel Xeon E3-1240v2
Which one of them would be better for cloud mining ?
Hi guy, here we are in a GPU mining discussion so you are out of topic,
anyway, the best one seems to be E3-1240, but I think it is non profittable as well,
consider that E3-1220 are capable of 1.7 hpm, that is absolutely too poor at the moment.
20
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCs first gambling service now available!
« on: January 02, 2014, 03:24:05 pm »
Can you kindly explain to a newbie like me what is a gambling service and how it works?
Thanks!
Thanks!
21
MemoryCoin / Re: CPU/GPU mining hardware comparison
« on: December 30, 2013, 11:45:07 pm »
i7 2600K 3.5 Ghz = 3.2 Hpm
E3 1230 = 1.9 Hpm
Dell PowerEdge C1100 2 x 5639 = 5.2 Hpm
E3 1230 = 1.9 Hpm
Dell PowerEdge C1100 2 x 5639 = 5.2 Hpm
22
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« on: December 30, 2013, 02:29:24 pm »Tested, opens and closes in a flash on win 8 64 bit. Using a Geforce 670 Card
It is for AMD Radeon only.
23
MemoryCoin / Botnet on pool.
« on: December 29, 2013, 05:35:17 pm »
It is very diffuse opinion that botnets are always not good practice in mining for a lot of reasons:
1) moral/etic/legal reason
2) they has not interest in coin itself but only in money making.
3) botnets skyrockets difficulty and acts as disincentive for others minsers.
Is very easy avoid botnets monitoring continue connection/disconnection or filter away low hpm ecc..
I hope I can use my comp power in a botnet free pool.
What you think about?
1) moral/etic/legal reason
2) they has not interest in coin itself but only in money making.
3) botnets skyrockets difficulty and acts as disincentive for others minsers.
Is very easy avoid botnets monitoring continue connection/disconnection or filter away low hpm ecc..
I hope I can use my comp power in a botnet free pool.
What you think about?
24
MemoryCoin / Re: Dedicated Servers
« on: December 29, 2013, 05:27:48 pm »
I'm using Datasoft dedicated servers, twin six core xeon (L5639) with AESni support and 8gb RAM for 99$ month.
That system are capable of 24 threads and more than 6hpm.
That system are capable of 24 threads and more than 6hpm.
25
MemoryCoin / Re: Its my birthday, have some free MMC
« on: December 29, 2013, 12:30:11 pm »
Happy B-day anyway
26
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 02:16:16 pm »
Adding the overall pool hpm can be usefull...
27
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 25, 2013, 11:46:31 pm »
We have lot of hash/m but not so much blocks
28
MemoryCoin / Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: December 23, 2013, 01:32:33 pm »They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
They have AES support according to:
http://ark.intel.com/products/48766/Intel-Xeon-Processor-L5638-12M-Cache-2_00-GHz-5_86-GTs-Intel-QPI
29
MemoryCoin / Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 am »
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
mainboard?
Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)
---
Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
30
MemoryCoin / Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: December 19, 2013, 02:35:08 pm »
2 x L5639 (24 thread) : 5.3 h/m
Pages: 1 [2]
