Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mint chocolate chip

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 65
47
Technical Support / Re: Why annual memberships are going away
« on: March 11, 2016, 12:05:14 am »
Unless you actually referred annual members...those referrers get screwed.

Most of the 31 annual members were either registered by OpenLedger or existed at genesis.  There are exactly four actual referrals of annual memberships, by three people.  If the community thinks reimbursing them is important, it would be possible to set up a worker to pay them manually (or make arrangements with an existing worker to do this).  One of those four annual memberships upgraded to LTM on its own, so their referrer has already been paid.  The remaining two referrers (two of the three accounts were referred by the same referrer) are:

1.2.97634 (referred annual member in block #3028579)
1.2.32176 (referred annual members 1.2.97382, 1.2.101152 who upgraded in blocks #1391978, #3255854)
Woohoo! I am the winner who is the loser by having referred 2 of the 3 annuals who get upgraded and will lose out on the 30% for the year and all future upgrade revenue.

Don't get me wrong...I agree with the getting rid of annual memberships, but do not like being the one who loses out.

Why would anyone have an annual membership at genesis...buddy buddy hook-up? The only free upgrades that were announced iirc were lifetime members for referring someone before the upgrade annoucement.

mint, I will send you $200 BitUSD for your trouble.   That should even things up a bit.
Fair deal...tyvm.

48
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 10, 2016, 08:36:32 pm »
Poloniex was in fact hacked in the past. Which means to me they are probably much more careful now.

49
Technical Support / Re: Why annual memberships are going away
« on: March 10, 2016, 08:14:59 pm »
Unless you actually referred annual members...those referrers get screwed.

Most of the 31 annual members were either registered by OpenLedger or existed at genesis.  There are exactly four actual referrals of annual memberships, by three people.  If the community thinks reimbursing them is important, it would be possible to set up a worker to pay them manually (or make arrangements with an existing worker to do this).  One of those four annual memberships upgraded to LTM on its own, so their referrer has already been paid.  The remaining two referrers (two of the three accounts were referred by the same referrer) are:

1.2.97634 (referred annual member in block #3028579)
1.2.32176 (referred annual members 1.2.97382, 1.2.101152 who upgraded in blocks #1391978, #3255854)
Woohoo! I am the winner who is the loser by having referred 2 of the 3 annuals who get upgraded and will lose out on the 30% for the year and all future upgrade revenue.

Don't get me wrong...I agree with the getting rid of annual memberships, but do not like being the one who loses out.

Why would anyone have an annual membership at genesis...buddy buddy hook-up? The only free upgrades that were announced iirc were lifetime members for referring someone before the upgrade annoucement.

50
Technical Support / Re: Why annual memberships are going away
« on: March 10, 2016, 02:36:02 pm »
Yeah, LTM sounds good. Nobody will complain about that.
Unless you actually referred annual members...those referrers get screwed.

52
General Discussion / Re: 1st Liquidity Event - Retrospection Thread.
« on: March 03, 2016, 02:23:12 am »
I am Sad that @Samupaha  who has never referred a user that made a single transaction thinks the 70+ blog posts lack relevancy, are full of uninteresting content and offer little value to readers.

I don't usually use my referral code, because Bitshares is to me first and foremost an ideological project. It's a way of signaling that I'm telling about it to people because I really believe in it, not because I can make money by telling about it. But I do also have a plan for referral website, I just haven't had time to do it.
Whatever helps you sleep at night

53
Technical Support / Re: Jolly fucked up bug
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:30:48 am »
While I'm at it, I had a similar gripe with the interface when it offered me the ability to pay a transaction fee in 30 BTS or X USD. I chose to pay in BTS, and was charged 32 BTS. Certainly, that might be how things are supposed to work when transferring USD or whatever I was doing, but as finicky as it may seem, where it comes to financial exchange software, things like fees and decimal places being as written, do matter.
Default transfer fee was 30 BTS if you transfer without a memo. If you have a memo, there will be an additional data-size fee (x per kb). See https://cryptofresh.com/fees
I asked the same thing last week when I paid more in fees than what was stated as the transfer fee. The memo field needs to explain this otherwise it looks like an overcharge to every user.

54
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:22:53 am »
localhost sent 11,540,000 BTS to poloniexwallet
30 minutes ago

Well there you go, he's officially out of BTS. Rally time?

 8)

localhost looks like a trust fund. Could it be a trust fund for development?
The AGS days had a guy give 10btc nearly everyday starting from Day1...I have a feeling this might be that guy.

55
General Discussion / Re: 1st Liquidity Event - Retrospection Thread.
« on: March 02, 2016, 05:02:31 am »
I am Glad that @noisy took the time and effort to link to the blog post on Reddit, that link alone brought 25 social clicks to the blog which saw a surge during the past two days of over 100 visits - 30 via internet search engines. Thank you to @cass for the graphic. Past few days resulted in 3 new accounts signed up.

I am Sad that @Samupaha  who has never referred a user that made a single transaction thinks the 70+ blog posts lack relevancy, are full of uninteresting content and offer little value to readers.

I am Mad that Coinmarketcap did not accurately reflect the volume for those assets like I thought it was going to.

56
General Discussion / Re: Potential BitShares Road Map for 2016
« on: March 01, 2016, 08:55:24 pm »
This sidechain idea, how long would it take to build that?

57
Cool useful apps, such as Augur. Bitcoin is just not as volatile as it used to be, hence MPAs are just not in demand like they once were.

59
Should not http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/views/all/ be reflecting today's volume action?

60
General Discussion / Re: Marketing plan for Bitshares 2.1
« on: February 29, 2016, 07:54:25 pm »
This is why we really need somebody to write blog posts. It's easy way of signaling that project is going forward.
FWIW http://bitsharesblog.com/

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 65