76
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: February 21, 2016, 09:23:38 pm »
Why when you transfer does it say Fee 30 BTS, but on the transfer confirmation popup it says something else, like: Fee 32.10937 BTS?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
77
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: February 21, 2016, 08:50:03 pm »Thanks!On the Obits:BTS market there is a transaction history that looks out of place:
42.8000 0.000 0.0043 2/21 08:37:06
How can that be when the orderbook has plenty of asks and bids in the teens and 20's ranges?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21577.msg280944.html#msg280944
78
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: February 21, 2016, 08:41:42 pm »
On the Obits:BTS market there is a transaction history that looks out of place:
42.8000 0.000 0.0043 2/21 08:37:06
How can that be when the orderbook has plenty of asks and bids in the teens and 20's ranges?
42.8000 0.000 0.0043 2/21 08:37:06
How can that be when the orderbook has plenty of asks and bids in the teens and 20's ranges?
79
General Discussion / Re: dShares Name discussion
« on: February 21, 2016, 03:06:51 pm »When the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.
When the lead developer of Mutiny wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as he has no other means to short BTS he did the next best thing - forked (not now but needed just an announcement) and is waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.
80
General Discussion / Re: dShares Name discussion
« on: February 21, 2016, 03:22:59 am »
Why the redacted OP tonyk?
Advantium, because we so want the name to sound like Etherium.
How about the name... Mutiny/Mutinous
Advantium, because we so want the name to sound like Etherium.
How about the name... Mutiny/Mutinous
81
General Discussion / Re: Is Diluting BTS 2.5% for +5% BitAsset Yield very low cost to Shareholders?
« on: February 20, 2016, 08:48:40 pm »
Let's not forget, developing this idea will not come cheap. That is a significant reason to consider the proposal by BM where he offerred to develop and implement it for free.
82
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 19, 2016, 05:59:55 am »I guess your using the term 'speak' loosely since its been about 100 days since the last time we heard from you around here.the shares are insanely undervalued given the sophistication and utility of the platform. There are some businesses that see that utility - hence my purchase of OpenPOS. The platform doesn't need to be all things to all people to succeed just enough things to enough businesses.
Wow thank you Riverhead!!
Let's also not forget Metaexchange, Blocktrades.us, Bunkershares, Sharebits, OpenLedger, Transwire, and I'm sure a bunch I don't know yet. These people are not going to walk away because a whale flounced.
I wish there were even more businesses that this, but at least its a start. The way I see it, businesses are the primary customers of BTS. We will never get mass adoption by normal users, or at least not for a long time, in some future where cryptos in general achieve adoption, but we can achieve adoption by businesses, who will get their users using BTS without even knowing it.
Its sad that the Banx guys never did anything with BTS 2.0, and apparently turned out to be the scam that some were accusing them of being. If they were legit, then BTS 2.0 could have been the way for them to prove their legitimacy. Their delay in upgrading to it probably means they are a scam and were using BTS as a way to keep things going for a few more months.
No scam here Ander - we are currently working on the move to BTS 2.0 as we speak
Well, I hope that does indeed happen.
83
General Discussion / Re: EASY FIX to improve user experience on DEX
« on: February 19, 2016, 04:50:57 am »Now we're talking!!!I read this thread quickly so maybe this has been already said but I think that ordering market by volume is also important. Poloniex way is very intuitive and also allows you to know directly when a coin is having more volume than usual.
Yes, as in Poloniex, my hope is to have markets grouped by primary assets: BTC, BTS, and a fiat (hopefully selectable by the user). Within each group, the markets can be sorted by volume in terms of the primary asset. So the idea is for BTC markets to be sorted by BTC volume, BTS markets sorted by BTS volume, and USD (just as an example) sorted by USD.
84
General Discussion / Re: Poloniex Deposit
« on: February 18, 2016, 01:52:13 pm »My withdrawal was credited this nightThanks for the explanations!, 6 hours ago.
I have a BTS withdrawal still "pending" after 9 hours. Lots of problems@inarizushi
I find poloniex very nice thanks to their "lending" panel, it's very easy to get 50+% annually on BTC, which is so nice compared to 0.75% in banks... I want a liquid collateralized bond market on the DEX so badly
How do you get 50+% on BTC? - I see loan offers for BTC on there at about .1%
0.1% it's per day
Yep assuming you got 2-day loans that auto renew with your interests (which is not the case, but you can have something close enough) you get:
(Interest per day * 2) to the power of (number of loans in a year)
With 0.1% per day: 1.002^(365/2) = 1.439, so 44% in a year
I've done lending only for a month or so, but most of the time it was around 0.15% a day, which gives 1.003^(365/2) = 1.7275, so around 73% a year.
But: it actually takes time to manage the loans (which are often cut into micro-loans), and poloniex takes 15% of the benefits as fees.
It'll be so cool to have that on the DEX!
85
General Discussion / Re: Poloniex Deposit
« on: February 18, 2016, 03:02:12 am »I have a BTS withdrawal still "pending" after 9 hours. Lots of problems@inarizushi
I find poloniex very nice thanks to their "lending" panel, it's very easy to get 50+% annually on BTC, which is so nice compared to 0.75% in banks... I want a liquid collateralized bond market on the DEX so badly
How do you get 50+% on BTC? - I see loan offers for BTC on there at about .1%
86
Freebie / Re: Open Beta: Testing the Tip/Sharebot Today @ Noon!
« on: February 17, 2016, 06:08:36 am »I think you only get one, literally a one time notification. Go back back back through your pm history and see if you have any "BtsTip Withdraw Code" in Subject with "btstip" in FromFWIW, I requested a withdrawal code earlier today and never received it (assuming they are still supposed to arrive on this forum in a pm).
I'll try again tomorrow.
Update : I still can't get a withdrawal code and none of my tips have been sent either.
87
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Blockchain maintenance developer
« on: February 16, 2016, 05:47:52 am »
What was the issue you guys solved?
88
General Discussion / Re: bitSHARES - As True Shares and Not a Currency!
« on: February 11, 2016, 08:41:34 pm »
Great idea! Actual shares, real dividends...it all sounds so good.
89
General Discussion / Re: Appearance of Deflation vs No Dilution
« on: February 07, 2016, 05:13:54 am »In practical terms how would we go through a process like this?There isn't really a process. Most people here know there are 3.7BB BTS. We just typically subtract the reserve fund when communicating supply.
I like the idea myself, mainly because when a BTS is actually burned, it would reflect a reduce in supply that would be noticeable. As of now, burned shares would sort of get lost in the daily supply changes. Remember how great this thread sounded... https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19014.0/all.html
90
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 06, 2016, 04:59:22 pm »
Proof of Confusion.
Do we still elect delegates?
Other references to delegates on the bitshares.org site:
https://bitshares.org/technology/delegated-proof-of-stake-consensus/
https://bitshares.org/technology/stakeholder-approved-project-funding/
https://bitshares.org/technology/transferable-named-accounts/
https://bitshares.org/referral-program/
This is likely just one of several examples of out-of-date information. Maybe we can get a worker to update the text on the site?
Do we still elect delegates?
Quote
All network parameters, from fee schedules to block intervals and transaction sizes, can be tuned via elected delegateshttps://bitshares.org/technology/
Other references to delegates on the bitshares.org site:
https://bitshares.org/technology/delegated-proof-of-stake-consensus/
https://bitshares.org/technology/stakeholder-approved-project-funding/
https://bitshares.org/technology/transferable-named-accounts/
https://bitshares.org/referral-program/
This is likely just one of several examples of out-of-date information. Maybe we can get a worker to update the text on the site?
