46
General Discussion / Re: Happy New Year to all our Chinese cousins!
« on: February 08, 2016, 10:09:37 am »
Happy new year!!!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
General Discussion / Re: Will this community be surpporting BM's "zero fee" proposal to get micropayment?
« on: February 08, 2016, 10:06:56 am »
This is the best announcement and game changer. This will welcome anybody to use the platform, casual users and business alike will use it.
48
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 06, 2016, 06:41:23 am »
Elected Witness Consensus (last one I promise)
49
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 05, 2016, 05:45:48 pm »
Voted Witness Consensus
or
Democratic Witness Consensus
or
Democratic Witness Consensus
50
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Unanswered question thread
« on: February 05, 2016, 12:15:21 pm »http://cassyo.cc/labs/muse/
(not ready yet - i was playing with this design direct after the MUSE launch)
@cass @cob just do it, 1 million times better.
51
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 05, 2016, 12:10:02 pm »DPOS is an innovation to be proud of.....it is fundamental to the existence of the BitShares network and Graphene technology. I welcome as much integration and co-operation with other blockchain projects as possible, but it's everyone else that matters more in terms of adoption.
I completely support Monsterer's suggestion for a white paper.
I don't think we should re-brand BitShares without a serious re-examination and optimization of all the marketing material/information (including the website) has been completed. We need a comprehensive plan for targeting our chosen market/s and to adjust the material towards that goal. Only then will we really know if there is a problem with the name of the network/community/platform.
Bitshares does not have a "bad" name, everyone knows that is there and loves it (whomever I talked to in crypto world). The issue has been the marketing, and I guess the merger. There was nothing wrong with the merger itself, but it kind of invalidated (discourage) the option building more chains using bitshares / graphene. But god knows what is happening in the background, maybe plasma etc plus insurance will be a winner. 
PS DPoS is great.
52
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 05, 2016, 09:47:13 am »
But Bitshares needs to continue alive same as the other chains, as it will continue to push the world boundaries.
53
General Discussion / Re: Should we Abandon Proof of Stake Marketing?
« on: February 05, 2016, 09:44:43 am »
DPoS or any label is not important, it is important how the consensus is achieved together with performance and speed. In perspective, why my business will use a blockchain? What are the options out there? Bitcoin, Ethereum, Graphene, OpenChain, Multichain, Eris. Public / Private, etc. What are the differences on trust?
On the bitshares perspective, yes the market is not in the Crypto, it is digital assets as in Blythe Masters. But that is what Identabit should be (IMHO).
On the bitshares perspective, yes the market is not in the Crypto, it is digital assets as in Blythe Masters. But that is what Identabit should be (IMHO).
54
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 04, 2016, 08:02:13 am »
i think it will be as simple as to pass the different params for docker.
55
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 04, 2016, 07:58:15 am »Could this be done as a deployment package in Azure? Both Faucet an API. (Thinking of killing 2 birds).Never worked with Azure, but this can certainly be done with docker ..
We were talking about demonstrating something to Azure as a chain which can hosted there, obviously they also support docker.
This is the Ethereum Blockapps Strato raw template https://raw.githubusercontent.com/azure/azure-quickstart-templates/master/blockapps-strato/azuredeploy.json
here is the main deployment https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/templates/blockapps-strato/
where is published https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/templates/
and the contact https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/blog/ethereum-blockchain-as-a-service-now-on-azure/
56
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Unanswered question thread
« on: February 04, 2016, 04:41:03 am »The peertracks website is fine, it is the muse one that needs to change. I bet @cass version is a million times better.
I don't want to insult anyone that created the page, but it feels cheap to me. It reminds of my dislike for the Bitshares page that was rolled out by Brian Page. If I came across the Peertracks page without prompting, I wouldn't feel confident in investing. When I get some time later today, I'll post some links on pages that I believe instill confidence. It's a personal feeling but one that echoed by the guys that I've recently convince to buy another 10 BTC worth. I feel like the page didn't do enough to convince him it was a legit project.
I see your point, and I felt the same, but he Muse one is the killer
. I guess a simpler page with "demo" shots of the video provided would be better, explaining both functionality and blockchain integration. I think there is not required the surprise factor anymore, or maybe wait until the demo is ready.
57
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 04, 2016, 04:25:49 am »
Could this be done as a deployment package in Azure? Both Faucet an API. (Thinking of killing 2 birds).
58
General Discussion / Re: Is it possible for bitshares to become a sidechain of bitcoin?
« on: February 04, 2016, 04:22:21 am »
Instead of witnesses cannot be done in a public way (specialised witnesses) by businesses. In a similar way I would like an easy way to adjust the asset issue balance between Bitshares and Ethereum, so assets can be transferred back and forth at a minimal cost for the end user.
59
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Unanswered question thread
« on: February 03, 2016, 05:02:46 pm »
The peertracks website is fine, it is the muse one that needs to change. I bet @cass version is a million times better.
60
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:10:14 pm »
I can setup one on bitshares.world, any special requirements?
