Quote from: MegaFarmer on January 09, 2014, 08:13:59 pm

Quote from: FreeTrade on January 07, 2014, 07:07:48 pm

I've noticed a correlation between Newmine winning votes and price decreases.

The value recovers somewhat when useful candidates win the positions back, but not quite as much as the drop.

NewMine has stopped his campaign and the price is skyrocketing DOWN now.

I'm noticing a correlation between Freetrade not answering questions about his premine and price decreases.

+2

hopefully it's a good one.  i havent followed this, is that guy reputable?

Quote from: phrozenspite on January 07, 2014, 01:55:12 am

Quote from: seraphim on January 07, 2014, 01:40:54 am

While I can't say anything about the amount of coins FreeTrade is holding, and what he is planning to do with them, I still disagree that the payout for the officers is too high. It is just a question what is being done for the money.
The high reward is thought as an incentive for people to get involved. While it could be enough (just for example) for a professional ad agency to apply as CMO this unfortunately didn't happen yet. But that's neither the fault of FreeTrade nor the other officers.

Compared to other alt coins, MMC already got a lot of infrastructure built around for the short time of its existence. Could be more with better candidates, but we wouldn't be where we are now without the grants.
I believe that FreeTrade thought there'd be a lot more competition for the offices. Seems like the reward is not high enough for professionals to get involved. Reducing the grants to 1/10th wouldn't make that situation better...

It would be hard for any of them to get voted in when FreeTrade appears to have 40k coins worth of votes from the MMC foundation addresses participating in the vote.

Of course I assume that he uses his coins to vote for the best candidate available.
Assuming that address is controlled by him, he just helped to spoil the CMO for now.

according to mmcvotes i see that he voted from his personal address.  I'm just not sure why if he is in control of them that he's using the foundation's coins to vote since it mentions on the foundation's site "To avoid a conflict of interest, MCF does not provide grants or payments to its administrator.".   Isn't it a pretty big conflict of interest that he's using one of them to vote for himself?

Quote from: itsik78 on January 06, 2014, 06:15:00 pm

According to this page: http://memorycoin.org/foundation/
M9rJudKWdiE4dQd2K6DD9bLtkviKwnhNZG is "Clearing" and
MHodpHe3qVMzGKtgcrjwRQdvUTEyaXfHPE is "Main".
These 2 total 250k MMCs
If these don't belong to a person, why the hell are these 2 voting for candidates?

Good point. Who owns that addresses?

well whatever the case, they're amounting to about 45k in votes
and according to the site
MCF is funded through the MemoryCoin grant award system. Its funds are currently administered by the coin’s founder and chief developer, FreeTrade. To avoid a conflict of interest, MCF does not provide grants or payments to its administrator.

So perhaps FreeTrade could answer that for us

you have my vote as well

Quote from: Brekyrself on December 17, 2013, 08:03:41 pm

Any update on this?  Will it be released to the public?

Right now. Sorta.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1921.0

mmc and pts use slighty different versions for their PoW so it would have to be changed further than just editing the host file.

because banning and blacklisting people for participating is less damaging than redistributing coins?  nice try

someone please explain me why are a huge different in performance between 7950 and 7970??
with my 7950 got 10 hpm >>> scrypt mining 650
with my 7970 got 19 hpm >>> scrypt mining 600

why is so bad the performance of the 7950??
Thanks

the 7970 should be faster in scrypt as well.  7970 is just more powerful in about every way