Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Crypto Kong

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
106
General Discussion / Re: Marketing efforts
« on: October 22, 2017, 07:17:13 am »
So now we need only two things:
  1) An input from Stan himself about possible interference between the two campaigns
  2) and this is the hard one - someone to take it upon himself to make a worker proposal and supervise the whole thing. As I have no experience in marketing, nor in management, and I'm not even from the US, I feel less than competent to do it myself.
Me neither but I had an idea the other day... Ark, in there slack channel do an AMA hour (ask me anything) for other coins. Then post a transcript to their Reddit. It’s quite popular. I’ve passed stans contact details on to DR10 a prominent community member and delegate. Anyway.... my idea, we could do a tour of popular slack channels doing an AMA to “keep the wider community updated”

What do you think???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

107
General Discussion / Re: Marketing efforts
« on: October 22, 2017, 06:22:54 am »
  As we slowly approach the new age of decentralized exchanges, more and more people are looking for  a good polo/'trex/etc alternative. We all know that there is already a fierce competition in the dex field. Right now it looks like our main competitor is waves - although we have consistently better daily volume, they've been on the market for a lot less time than we have and already have bigger following (at least at twitter they have x1.5 more followers than we do if that can be used as a metric).
 I know that our platform is better in every way (I can't relate to even the UI complaints), but it worries me that people won't care. Their marketing is better, more people are hearing about them and it won't matter to them that the order matching is centralized - for a non-tech trader as long as it works fast and reliably it will be a go to platform. And it will work fast and reliably, at least for some time - they will not shoot themselves in the foot with front running.
As we all know better tech doesn't always win, marketing does.
 We also know that Stan is organising a huge marketing effort for the billion hero campaign and has hired some strong names in the marketing business. Personally I have no idea where it stands right now, because he hasn't published relevant updates for some time, and what his exact gameplan is too.
 What I want to ask is why not hire the same guys that Stan has, who it seems are already familiar with our product, to take on the "routine" marketing for bitshares?
 Or do you think it's redundant because the hero campaign will do it anyways? I just feel like I'm sitting in the dark, waiting for a miracle to happen. "Soon, guys, soon the Mighty Stan will come and shine the light through our dark cave, you just have to beleive..."

I just want to see your thoughts on this, no disrespect to anyone.
No problem in running seperate marketing campaigns...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

108
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24158.msg309598.html#msg309598

Not a new idea, but I like the idea.

Effectively, shorters will experience debt destruction whilst holders experience the slow deflation of holdings.

I believe that such a proposal will have a one-sided market, with an over abundance of sellers (shorters) and a lack of buyers.

HERTZ style assets have the best of both worlds, both appreciation and deprecation.
In theory if it’s opposite to the hero coin a balance should be achievable as they cancel each other out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

109
would you buy something that you KNOW is guaranteed to be less worth tomorrow?

me neither.
Your missing the point. You wouldn’t buy it, but you would definitely sell it if you were holding. Therefore people will borrow to sell it to make a profit. This is the theory.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]