Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KillerByte

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 20
151
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 28, 2013, 02:06:21 am »
Quote
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
. . .
It works pretty well.

Rlly? For me, it reads:

Code: [Select]
16 miner threads started, using MMC Momentum Proof-of-Work algorithm.
. . . and offers no further feedback or indication that it is actually mining anything, and my CPU activity meters barely fluctuate at all.

Is it actually doing anything (is it mining)? The command I used to run it was:

Code: [Select]
minerd.exe --url http://mmc.xpool.xram.co:1339 --user MyMMCaddressBlahBlahBlahBlahBlahBl -D -P --threads 16

uh... nvm, if that is the mining client for the other pool, then maby not... maby the person posted on the wrong thread.?

152
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 28, 2013, 12:33:56 am »
UPDATE: The latest confirmed block will be payed out again, since there are extra funds sitting on the pool. Hopefully this will make up for any lost funds. Enjoy!

153
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 28, 2013, 12:28:57 am »
Just got payout  :)

+1 yay !

killer the stats still show the same balance though, needs attention :)


thanks for the reports. Has been fixed. Sorry about the delay! :)

All balances reset to 0, I will resolve any payouts that were pending a little later :( Sorry about that, but the payouts bug seems to be identified.

154
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 08:06:00 pm »
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong

first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what

second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?

keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)

1. The miner is not easy to compile I agree. I will look into it.. but I am overloaded

2. Payouts are supposed to happen every 30 minutes, but that has not been working out recently because balances have been getting off and payouts have been having errors. I have been trying to fix it for days now

3. Glad you support this pool :)

heya,

1. well i posted the fix ;) add this line as an optional for ppl who have problems and are missing libs:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
this installs 3 things that were missing

2. ah, well looking forward to when it works :))

3. sure thing man, i aim to keep supporting it

1. will add to main post in a sec, as soon as forum stops delaying my posts 60 seconds :)Thanks for the fix.

155
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 08:03:14 pm »
Seems like the restart fixed the bug with balance not being subtracted from unconfirmed, but still wrong block on front page. Is that value stored somewhere in the db?

yes, the fix only applies for newly found blocks. Those blocks are stored in the database, and would be a pain to change :)

156
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:58:52 pm »
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong

first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what

second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?

keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)

1. The miner is not easy to compile I agree. I will look into it.. but I am overloaded

2. Payouts are supposed to happen every 30 minutes, but that has not been working out recently because balances have been getting off and payouts have been having errors. I have been trying to fix it for days now

3. Glad you support this pool :)

157
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:55:12 pm »
pool is restarting to fix the block offset bug, any future blocks mined will not have this issue.

158
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:51:01 pm »
hmm... well fun being ignored ..

Did I miss a post of yours?

KillerByte, are you still having to manually trigger payouts? I am showing a balance of 6. Would feel better about staying on your pool if I actually get a payout.

MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP


yes, I am unfortunately. I think it may have something to do with the fact that my pool is off one block with the confirmation time. I wil lfix now, and reset user balances. estimated time of fixes: 2 hours.

159
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:22:26 pm »
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000

I can:

00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541

...oh, that was revealing... the block number is off :) I dont understand though... I fixed that bug ages ago.

Oh well, makes almost no difference. I will fix that though.
its good news for miners who mine on you pool)) that means pool isnt on fork...
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7 3027
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541 3001

I think I have had every problem possible with memorycoin now. My datacoin and primecoin pools are quite peaceful and operate jubilently on a daily basis... :), but my memorycoin pool always lacks stability.

160
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:12:07 pm »
just found the bug now with the blocks... XRamPool's block number is off... nothing is wrong otherwise.

161
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:11:03 pm »
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000

I can:

00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541

...oh, that was revealing... the block number is off :) I dont understand though... I fixed that bug ages ago.

Oh well, makes almost no difference. I will fix that though.

162
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:46:33 pm »
Quote
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.

XRamPool is on the working fork.

If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.

3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.

Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?

yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.
Care to send 1 satoshi from it somewhere and post the tx id?

It's not confirmed, but I can post all of the transaction ID

163
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:41:33 pm »
Quote
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.

XRamPool is on the working fork.

If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.

3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.

Could this be considered false advertising? :)
Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?

yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.

164
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:36:18 pm »
KillerByte please check your server.. you have the same blocks found like on mmcpool.com!!

I have checked, and made a post on the MMCPool thread. All of our blocks are valid and not orphans.

Please KillerByte ... take a look to my account ... about 5 MMC hold 2 days ....

MJf2aL2WYZqJvMAPEpufbvoQRW2tHiRZ48

Thankyou

It didn't get sent to you? OK, let me look at the payouts again I guess. Thanks for the report.

165
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:34:26 pm »
Quote
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.

XRamPool is on the working fork.

If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though :) Then it would have the working fork.

3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.

Could this be considered false advertising? :)

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 20