Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KillerByte

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20
196
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 10:28:28 pm »
pool has been restored finally.

NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.

I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.

Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)

EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.

why not duplicate server for port 8080? what you think?

I could give it a try... But let's wait a day for that...:-)

197
MemoryCoin / Re: XPool - How to continue & fix problems...
« on: December 25, 2013, 10:23:43 pm »
i see you limited the number of workers... how about creating another pool with this limit? maybe on another port or something

yeah, I really should have multiple instances of the pool. That would be cool.

Unforunately, I would have to do some changes to the JSON-RPC, and make the web interface unified, but its a good idea. I could also license pool operators... if that makes sense... to run a instance of the pool publicly for mining, and the web interface could connect and retrieve stats and unify it as XPool. The other pool operators could work with me to improve the code and solve problems.

That still seems inefficient though... :)

198
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 10:21:18 pm »
pool has been restored finally.

NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.

I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.

Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)

EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
it shows 807 workers, u sure it's limited? :)

I am, sometimes it lets in a few extra workers, but I have not seen it go above 820.

199
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 10:02:59 pm »
pool has been restored finally.

NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.

I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.

Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)

EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.

200
MemoryCoin / Re: XPool - How to continue & fix problems...
« on: December 25, 2013, 09:43:07 pm »
yes, perhaps we can figure a way of separating it. just pick a few people and work with them behind the scenes.

its possible, but then there is a potential trust issue, and that still spawns worries.

My advice:  Do what makes you happy, and what you feel is worth it.

That being said; I myself have run several large successful and some not-so-successful projects.  In every case the people who complain the most, seem to be the loudest -- and it's hard to ignore that.  But on the other hand the people who have no issues and no problems with what you're doing are content to remain quiet and drop the occasional compliment.  It's important to stay focused, and remind yourself that for every negative complaint, there's probably 50 other people quietly appreciating what you're doing.

I am sure people are willing to help commit to code if you open source it.  I think if people are willing to help fix it, the funds you get from a working pool would help pay for itself in time.  It may even spawn a few other pools to help take the load off of yours.

In the end, it's your decision.  I can't really help more than offering words of support and appreciation (and the 100 mmc for the pool fund), I hope you "stay in the game" though!

Merry Christmas!

great post. I will keep that in mind.

201
MemoryCoin / Re: XPool - How to continue & fix problems...
« on: December 25, 2013, 09:36:58 pm »
if you publish the code, other pools will appear like mushrooms after the rain...

I know... that is what I am worried about. But I also have a problem, and I cant do it all...

203
MemoryCoin / XPool - How to continue & fix problems...
« on: December 25, 2013, 09:27:53 pm »
Well, I have been working on XPool for a few days now. It has developed greatly and I have done much work to improve the pool.

Unfortunately, I keep running into problems, the pool server keeps crashing, and I do not have enough time to work on all the improvements I wanted to get done.

The pool software for my pool is not standard: it is written directly inside the source code for memorycoind. This has its advantages, but it causes alot of problems also.

I am unwilling to switch to a pushpool server at this time... simply because I have worked really hard on this pool and dont have time to restart.

I am not saying XRamPool is done or over (and YES, payouts will be executed one way or another, I even have the balance file ready with the correct balances. All will be payed properly), but I simply cant do it all. I am overwhelmed.

So I guess I have created this thread to get some help and insight on how to continue... I feel like people like the pool and if I could just fix these crashes, then things would be much better.

Should I just release the source code to the community to fix and make better? If that would be the case, would I still be able to recieve adequete funding to pay for the pool?

Would the community put the source code I publish into good use, or will it just be a useless project?

204
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 09:15:15 pm »
if i use different mining pc is necessary different pooluser? i prefer only one, but you add? is problem different ip?

no, not at all.

205
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:56:52 pm »
I have a question. After being mining almost a day during the uptime I checked my stats and see that I had 0,03 MMC confirmed and 0,07 MMC unconfirmed.

Are those stats correct, if it is I don't think that worth the effort :/

Mining with 40 Cores in 6 computers...

only 0.03, 0.07?

what is your normal hashrate for one of those machines when you mine solo?

206
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:49:54 pm »
The crash always happens on net.cpp, line 980 on the standard memorycoind...

bug in memorycoind?

From the error, at a google-glance, are you running out of memory or temp space?

nope, the temp memory isnt even used and there is plenty enough RAM...

207
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:45:35 pm »
what is the OS (linux flavour) used?

arch linux, updated

I am going to focus on getting those payouts going... get your wallets ready.

208
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:40:47 pm »
agreed... but there is nothing online about how to fix it.

the backtrace does not show anything useful either... maby its a bug in the memorycoin client that only comes from great stress?

209
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:36:04 pm »
dmesg -T | tail

[Wed Dec 25 20:17:24 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 211571354 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Deleted empty journal /var/log/journal/bb9d0a52a41243829ecd729b40ac0bce/user-1000@c4ef46c298b543f9ab9fbe27625479c4-0000000000000000-0000000000000000.journal (3735552 bytes).
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Vacuuming done, freed 3735552 bytes
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 237032090 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long

... and that message is repeated many times.

210
MemoryCoin / Re: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
« on: December 25, 2013, 08:33:20 pm »
any ideas on the buffer overflow message?

Quote
*** buffer overflow detected ***: memorypool terminated

some attack directed to the port on which the pool is running?

I doubt... I think it is another system limit or something...

I just backtraced it and it was not from any of my pool functions...

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20