Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Digital Lucifer

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 25
166
Technical Support / Re: Diposit Bitusd at exchange
« on: May 20, 2019, 06:39:50 pm »
Unfortunately your guess is correct. :-[
I test it and transfer 1 bitusd from coinpayments to my ether address in atomic wallet.And unfortunately, the transfer was done easily so it's not on the bitshare platform and is an etherum token ...
But I'm confused about recognize price in coinpayments and other wallet...scam coin on etherum platform have same price with orgional coin on bitshare platform!!

Very sorry for your loss. Same price ? yeah, the whole point of 1 bitUSD is to be equivalent to 1 USD so its not really hard to copy the price. :)

167


Can a mod look at this and help me figure out why it adds this unsecure http stuff to my links? I put https in intentionally.

I modded you original message just replacing capital `H` for `h` as Abit mentioned above. All works now.


Chee®s

168
General Discussion / Re: Does it make sense to cultivate bitEUR?
« on: May 19, 2019, 06:10:59 pm »
The usual chick&egg problem.
No one selling bitEUR, but also no use-case for bitEUR (other than a few worker proposals).

if necessary, there are several ways to make liquidity. the problem is:

is it possible and helpful for bitEUR to connect BTS and EURO fiat?

does European people think it's enough to have USD-pegged stable coin in the cryptocurrency world, no need to have EURO pegged stable coin?

Coinbase Pro and others are trading significant amounts of money in EUR to be, let's say demand for stable EUR. We are not having liquidity/markets/fiat gateway for it yet...

I would be supportive towards more activity/existence on it.

Chee®s

169
i guess the UI teamneeds to update their procedure and bump the website too
Maintainer of bitshares.org website also need to keep an eye on updates.

Moving it to completely new page and structure by Monday as noted in Telegram earlier.

Will be better in future on release updates - regardless.

Chee®s

170
General Discussion / Re: Complaint against clockwork witness
« on: May 17, 2019, 03:48:56 am »
Dont see any issues with clockworks feeds, the price of bitCNY on the DEX is irrelevant to the feed, the price at any given time reflects market sentiment on the DEX for that smartcoin. Feeds are meant to reflect an accurate price of CNY in BTS from third party sources otherwise if the price comes from your own DEX trading price then it can easily be manipulated. Are the formulas published openly ?

BitCNY was traded, day before yesterday, on the DEX 6.99 and 7.05 for 1 bitUSD, while its actual fiat conversion rate was ~6.88

Regardless of what witness will feed, its heavy manipulated market and arbitrage from their fiat gateway to DEX and vice-versa. I do understand why so much interest for "perfection" around bitCNY, but i'm not letting someone like Alex being raped publicly without even decent colleague to ask him on PM - "hey man, whats up with your feed ? Do you need some help ?". Instead I see Asian community disregarding his timezone and regular life obligations on top of it, and just ram.

Btw, on the other hand, fellow stakeholders, if we are so much into the price feeds, why the f**k securitydatanode block producer is active, signing blocks and not providing ANY feeds ?

171
General Discussion / Re: Complaint against clockwork witness
« on: May 15, 2019, 01:08:41 pm »
The most important job for witnesses is reliably producing blocks. Other jobs, yes, they can do too. When voting, different people consider different things.

Just brain storming. Please discuss.

Agree - Somehow our entire ecosystem is going nuts about someone who has less missed blocks than 30% of the entire block production line.

172
General Discussion / Re: Complaint against clockwork witness
« on: May 15, 2019, 01:01:06 pm »
BHUZ EXAMPLE


Clockwork - just publish feeds every 1+ hour like everybody else, I believe you'll get less problems.



See ? Your feed is too tight man. Every 20 mins... Better save those 3-4 BTS extra like others and all good ;)


Chee®s


173
General Discussion / Re: Complaint against clockwork witness
« on: May 15, 2019, 09:33:28 am »
Certainly, I think clockwork is one who cares a lot. But it makes a difference if you go from zero feedback to a pitchfork mob without even having a clear definition of duties and guidelines for what a fair price is, or if you choose to start constructive conversation in the matter.

I am not directed against clockwork, but this is a serious problem among some witness.

Constructive conversation? yes,for many times, but i found nobody care about it, maybe clockwork cares a lot, but where the other commitmess and witnees? especially the witnees.

I also disapproved to go at somebody, but we need to find out someway to solve these problems and prevent these things happend again and again.

I do agree with this clear and factual statement of yours 100%. And i do agree that interest on witness overall and other participants is definitely not enough. But I also agree with Stefan that Alex is the one who care, so again no reason to fud him, and at least minimum would be 48 hours to correct the problem in IT, since he is not paid for it on Premium terms and exclusive 24hrs support base.

Instead of having now dozens of workers setting up just parameters on certain bitAssets, why not just write new BSIP's for both bitCNY and bitUSD ? It could include all parameters configured individually and price feed terms (fair price, price feed recovery, fix, sources for prices, etc) for the witnesses as basic requirements for their jobs.

I think that having 2 BSIP's followed by 2 clean workers can be a good start for this issue we have. Any additional tweaks can be short workers that would be additional milestones/tweaks on current BSIP's and their respective workers.

Chee®s

174
Please cancel the voting of clockwork. He often does not adjust the price in time.

Can we see somewhere specific rule written on what is the exact time requirement on a fix of external exchange ? Without such terms there should be no reason for vote removal.
I haven't seen any witness being removed during enforced price feed on BitUSD for BSIP42 by Jerry or anyone taking responsibility going against written document (Still there) that it should NOT BE APPLIED to bitUSD due to liquidity and lack of expertise on economics of it (data analysis).

Stop this witch hunt. Be human. We can all be nasty and say nasty things to each other. Doesn't helps to anything or anyone.

Chee®s

175
General Discussion / Re: Complaint against clockwork witness
« on: May 15, 2019, 07:42:53 am »
We are all guilty of few things:

-Impatience
-Intolerance
-Lack of technical knowledge (few members)
-Lack of knowledge in economics (few members)
-Lack of respect towards colleagues across the Globe or timezone they are in, families/jobs they have or things they did around.

One bad feed for one period doesn't make the witness bad. Script and API does. And whoever points the finger and its part of this organization. We should all be more united together instead of constantly being on some "witch hunt" as mentioned above.

A lot of you people here are having skills that can be useful to this ecosystem (including stakeholders), but yet everybody have their own goals/interests aligned to themselves and nobody more.

OMO USD funds or anything else that was worked on and went south... ->> no agreement, no terms, no entities, no passport copies... what did you all expect ? Why I'm so interested into reaching certain level of legality around BitShares for so long... So businesses, gateways and our employees can finally get a tight knot around the neck and stop fucking around when some responsibility is on them. It's easy to cashout all the time and have 0 responsibility, but it's hard to put a face or name to thing or a fuckup that you are cashing out from.

Please stop pointing out fingers to each other and try help each other. I haven't seen one block producer offering help with API or issues that Clockwork has, but I see a lot of people just going along with fingers.

P.S. Abitmore is excused from the sentence above, he can all teach us some manners and business ethics, even being completely anonymous person around for years. His opinion is always solid and individual, explained well in details and proved with facts/estimates done properly



Chee®s







176
General Discussion / Re: vote witness : ioex,Get dividends
« on: May 02, 2019, 07:29:15 am »
To increase your chances

* you should prove your technical competence by running a testnet witness before you try mainnet
* you should have a backup server running in hot standby
* you should run a public API node as well
* your feed price should accurately represent the fair value of BTS against the underlying asset

Trying to buy votes is frowned upon by many and will most likely lead to the big voters *not* voting for you.

Thank you for your kind advice.
* I have a witness node cit-ioex on Citshares(https://www.citshares.org/explorer/witnesses),you can see it as a test network.
* I will consider to set a backup server , and I have the ability , I've done it before .
* Now the API node have not yet open to public , now is for private use .
* My feed price will accurate , and i allow a little higher than CNY or USD , but i don't allow the feed price lower than , lower feed price is a tool to hurt investors in some sense.
 
And i want to say this is not buying votes . Being a witness is a money-making thing now, of course, it can be used as a company operation to dividend shareholders. And my money is paid after earning it,that is the key point.

You came here to advertise fork and ask for a witness ?
Your reply to "setup testnet witness on BitShares network" is "look at my witness on a fork of it" ?
You are asking people to "share dividends" as a witness a.k.a. buying votes ?

If someone doesn't cleanup this thread within 24 hours from other admins, I'll revisit.

And reply to all your posts in this thread is just one big NO, THANK YOU.

177
General Discussion / MOVED: Testnet witness: iamredbar1-witness
« on: April 14, 2019, 06:46:21 am »

178
understand, then just let them equal.

Who from the committee can do this?

It was proposed few days ago already, but Committee failed to vote on it on time. I believe Clockwork is setting up new proposal.

179
i've fixed my transaction problem. With Chrome can't open it, but with opera is fine. Thanks for your reply

You will have to purge Cache from your Chrome browser if you are having problems. Chrome is still far more stable and supported than Opera,  even though Opera works (I use it as well).

Locked



Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 25