Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
DL, your opinion will be too biased for this discussion, I need other community members' opinions instead
I don't think this complaints is reasonable.
we have gone through the process from bsip drafting to bsip voting to implementation.
maybe I played a key role in the whole process, but even I do not know the exact time that MSSR change from 1.1 to 1.05.
I drafted the bsip and open the voting worker proposal.
as a proxy, I vote the bsip.
when the voting passed, i reminded the witnesses to change.
but should/can I give a time and request all the witnesses to change at that time?
I don't think this is necessary or very feasible.
if you run trade bots and the MSSR is important to your trading, you need to always get MSSR before trading.
now if more voting power oppose to reduce MSSR than support it, then theoretically witnesses can change the result just according to the voting result.
this is decentralization.
Did the SEC actually take BBF/whoever to court? Where is the evidence for this?
Did the SEC actually take BBF/whoever to court? Where is the evidence for this?
@alt, You're wrong on this one.can you told me how obvious he is not follow the median price?
Crazybit FINALLY updated his feeding script (which you were right to be upset about) but he is not cheating now.
He is not FOLLOWING median price, instead his feed is SETTING median price most of the time (which means he is very accurate)
This becomes obvious if you don't track by hand but instead use zapata's tracker to look at his and other witnesses feeding activity: http://pricefeed-tracker.dex.trading/
did you see the snapshot about how exactely his feed price change after the median price?
and thank you, this chat show more clear that how exactely every 5 meniutes his price followed the median price. just choose the price from crazybit and median price.
Total 2550 Members.
2550?!
That is a way bigger number than I thought it was going to be. Less spam waves of posts, better experience.
Can you put accounts with 0 posts not logged in for a year on "must be reappeared" state? How many accounts like that are there?
Arent accounts now manually approved?These spamming accounts where old sleeping accounts from 2015.
Yes, these two issues have been fixed recently. The misspelling was merged a few days ago and the market fee will be in the next release.
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/2375
What about the missing fee calculation ?
I have not done anything with that. Looks like it’s been brought up a couple times: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/2375
I fixed the spelling, it is already merged with the development branch.
These have been reported on the GitHub repo, and will be taken care of.
Hello,
I'm using the Bitshares UI version 181121-rc1 and I'm wondering why the market fees are not updating as I type in values when placing an order.
For instance, selling BTS in the BTS/BitUSD market should have 0.1% market fee, but it remains 0.
Can anyone let me know if the Market fee is taken even though not displayed?
Also, please fix this typo in the "Deposit USD" button:
Thanks,
