Duplicate https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26982.0;topicseen

Maybe i was harsh in the original reply/post, but i was definitely not wrong...

Fav, Clockwork, whoever has privilege - lock and move please.

Infrastructure update 11.09.2018

- Nodes has been added to wallet.bitshares.org (by pull request on github in develop branch)

check compare https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/compare/develop...dls-cipher:patch-1?diff=split

Pull request is here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/pull/1844

- Currently there is 21 provisioned node. Here is the full list:

1. status200.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
2. new-york.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
3. australia.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
4. dallas.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
5. chicago.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
6. atlanta.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
7. us-la.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
8. japan.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
9. france.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
10. england.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
11. holland.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
12. miami.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
13. valley.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
14. seattle.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL
15. bitshares.nu - OK - Premium SSL
17. api.open-asset.tech - OK - SSL to be deployed
18. canada6.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL
19. paris7.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL - DNS Propagating
20. frankfurt8.daostreet.com - OK - Premium SSL
21. testnet.bitshares.apasia.tech - OK - Premium SSL

LEGEND:
GREEN - 100% operational
ORANGE - up to 24 hours issue
RED - up to 72 hours issue

- Structure

Currently status200 is biggest node with largest bandwidth included in the package. We are using that node with automatic backup script to stop one time a week, provide fresh backup of 'witness_node' software with fully synced blockchain and using simple .sh scripts are provisioning that node to all others.

Scripts can be inspected here https://github.com/dls-cipher/pre-compiled-witness_node
(its pretty lame and dirty bash scripting with plans to be polished, even more interactive as setup in shell)

Status can be checked for currently running nodes within our website https://status.apasia.tech

There is more than 21 listed on status page, since we are adding them as we provision them, to keep better track of hours towards invoicing.

All trackers are reseted and starting from today.

- Overview

1. We had to turn OFF most of the daostreet nodes in order to cut cost with AWS of 1800-2000$ a month for just 9 VPS instances.
2. For any questions please reply here or find me in telegram @murda_ra

- Escrow partner is invoiced for 1-time setup (reimbursement fees), while on-going invoices (cost of the nodes) will be delivered by 20. September.


NOTICE: If dallas/testnet node shows strange behavior please report it asap. Those 2 are sitting on one instance currently running multi websocket with multi-domain nginx configuration.


Cheers.

No need for check, I was not wrong - But was not expecting zb.com

So, bts account yang2017 created a lot of accounts since June until now including for-one. Earlier Kimchi-King commented on Twitter on zbbts001 account as new Chinese exchange without website or nobody knows anything about.

Yang2017 who came creating all of the accounts created the main accounts who are in Active threshold of the zbbts001 (who currently has 65M BTS in wallet).


Active
zhou001   33   19.88%
tan001   33   19.88%
xu001   33   19.88%
ybts01   33   19.88%
hua01   33   19.88%
BTS8DZZ2xUvf7QV8VndBdvuTG1EPdmSDJBaPFP7TEeePy4DuvzKzt   1   0.6%
Threshold   51   30.7%


http://cryptofresh.com/u/zbbts001 - exchange account

http://cryptofresh.com/u/yang2017

http://cryptofresh.com/u/for-one


So, you have very nice stack there, very nice private business, 800k BTS Volume in trading and very nice VIP programs https://vip.zb.com/vote/rules

I don't see you doing anything good for BitShares Blockchain actually, apart for yourself only.

Not to mention that you have "your own blockchain"

https://vip.zb.com/activity/zbecology

And example of a shitshow here in forums regarding zb.com who is apparently very hard to be contacted even by their own users.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25494.msg313498#msg313498



Many thanks for the attempt and appreciate towards all the hard work you've done for the blockchain.

As far as im concerned, based on the way you did approach and what i can dig about you - We are not currently accepting new BPs

But my stake means nothing, so it's actually up to the real stake-holders and proxies. Hopefully my report above will be more useful than for-one's introduction.

Reminder: Keep comments in English.

Many thanks.

Probably referring to e.g.

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1529

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1570

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1634

The insult happened, could not find it now. It was more than simple discussion though.

You cant find it because worker manager/repository manager can delete, hide or even alter/edit comments.

UPDATE

Thanks to Escrow Partner, BitShares Blockchain Foundation, I would like to announce that worker has been placed on chain and its currently available for VOTING.

Worker id: 1.14.117
Accounting by Escrow: https://workers.bitshares.foundation/201808-trusty-community-ui-p1
Worker Publication by Escrow: https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2018-08-trusty-community-ui-p1


Many thanks for support and respect shown, we are all very grateful for feedback received here.

On behalf of APT and Trusty,

Let the Voting BEGINS!

@jademont


Why have you approved bitcrabs proposal to create new assets and lower the CR of the commitee account to nearly 2 when the community consensus on the WP was that no new asset will be allowed to create if the Ratio is under 4 ?
That WP has been only approved because of that high CR ratio.

Who or what gave you the right to break the community consensus without even informing about it the community ?

Stop talking nonsense. Here is quote from original proposal of BitCrab (last edit in MARCH 2018)

2. operators need to take good care while operate with debt positions, as an initial rough principle, when BTS price is under 2CNY:
while collateral ratio > 4, borrowing more smartcoin is allowed.
while 4>collateral ratio>3, smartcoin income can be used to buy more BTS, but borrowing more smartcoin is not allowed.
while 3>collateral ratio, smartcoin income need to be used to reduce debt position, buying more BTS is not allowed.

There was already definition of

ratio above 4
under 4
under 3
and terms to stick to it.

Now please stop spamming forum, next post and thrashing other threads with your constant attacking will be reported to Admin/Moderator.

Why are you as Proxy and Commitee member being silent to these accusation and questions ?

Don't you feel you should explain why you still keep supporting Bitcrabs WP even there has nothing changed.

There are still no public rules or any transparency ?

Don't you have an obligation as proxy and commitee member to inform your voters why you decide this way ?

He did. Read above:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=20792.msg320357#msg320357

Please keep it English (if you want the non-chinese community to be involved)

For the future posts, yes please.