Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Digital Lucifer

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25]
361
Quote
You can always submit to IRS official documentation and say the truth "They don't support instant export of financial books, i have to pay and wait for the process of generating such reports", as any other reasonable person would do in your case.

My place of residence is not in the USA. By IRS, I meant "tax authorities" in my country. But maybe I can do the same thing.


Quote
1) Find a friend, wife, sister, cousin who is a bit technical and ever used Linux or Mac and you are 40% good to go.

I am a little bit technical. I have also used Ubuntu before. Besides, I'm good at reading myself in. But I need a good detailed guide for this exact problem. However, my basic knowledge is limited. Of course, I don't want to study for days just to get a simple export. The trustworthy people around me have little technical understanding.

Despite technical hurdles, OpenLedger should still simplify this process for laymen. Taxes affect most people and sooner or later most of them will have to deal with the subject. I think such problems limit the growth of OpenLedger and bitshares.

Can someone provide a detailed guide that allows technically average informed people to get this export done?
PM me, if you want tutorial/step by step help.

362
There is no simple way to access/see entire history. [...] Please use API Docs from official Bitshares or reach someone who can be trusted on your side to do it for you (it will request your encrypted keys in order for your history to be generated/accessed ).


No! Do not hand over your keys to anyone!

You can easily access the entire history of your own account(s) by running a full node of your own. Your private keys are not required.

1) Find a friend, wife, sister, cousin who is a bit technical and ever used Linux or Mac and you are 40% good to go.
2) You are telling someone non technical to DEPLOY A FULL NODE ON HIS OWN AND DO TRANSACTION HISTORY ? You are having a piss or a blast with reason in your head ?

Cheers,

Luci.

363
No one has an answer? Something so simple should be possible without any problems.

Openledger. info has the following info:

"We are not able to show you all the information about your transaction history - only the latest 100.
Check this link https://github.com/openledger/openledger_nodejs_api to find out full history."

I'm not an expert. How does it work with nodejs_api? Is there a comprehensible guide for laymen somewhere? I just want to download the complete transaction history. I need this urgently!

There is no simple way to access/see entire history. You have to understand that in case of larger volume of trading that file would be making half of UI unresponsive. Please use API Docs from official Bitshares or reach someone who can be trusted on your side to do it for you (it will request your encrypted keys in order for your history to be generated/accessed ).

You can always submit to IRS official documentation and say the truth "They don't support instant export of financial books, i have to pay and wait for the process of generating such reports", as any other reasonable person would do in your case.

Cheers,

Luci.

364
I don't think theres any type of fully trustless BTC gateway (sidechain) but some proposed are very secure and would be good enough to use as BTC collateral for smartcoins.

This would be huge! And a real win for bitshares / marketing opportunity.

Just think any bitcoin holder in the world could get a USD loan against their BTC.

For those of you worried that this would damage the value of BTS I disagree because all fees will still ultimately be paid in BTS even when paying or collateralising in SIDE.BTC

I see the system inconsistent. SmartCoins are self-assured, but if tomorrow morning the Gateway has disappeared, or has been banned or hacked, who guarantees the collateral?

If I am BitUSD holder and there is a black swan event I know I will receive at least the collateral. What will I receive if the Gateway disappears? BTS? From where?

If it is not possible to find clear answers to these questions that would imply that BitUSD would become a weak asset totally dependent on the Gateway's survival. Crazy.

We are talking about a trustless or near trustless BTC gateway (sidechains.)  We are not talking about a UIA gateway like OPEN.BTC

Ok, Sidechains, it's not clear in the proposal and we've all understood something different. It is clear that using a third-party Gateway is crazy.

If we use Sidechains we do not need a gateway. We can simply send BTC to a Sidechain address to send the funds to another chain.

If so, I agree that it is a good idea that can greatly improve BTS!!

It also has it's downfall. Using sidechain"s" means we are becoming centralized exchange when it comes to BTC. Similar to OpenLedger with open.BTC, just we don't need liquidity for it :) Gilgamesh from Telegram Bitshares DEX has a missing piece of white paper how few Witness Nodes should be confirming that transaction before it goes to sidechain, with a very nice concept he created.
We started some discussion today on it in Telegram, and tomorrow we will continue more on setting up a real proposal for design/implementation on it, since we had some tests with sidechain BTC wallet last week. In the way of random witness is coming to confirm transaction, means that it would be staying decentralized since anything going there would be passing decentralized system and BTC would be on a blockchain outside of Bitshares.

And yes, i know that many will say "but we dont know will witness agree"... You wanna help community ? You are a witness ? You job is to WITNESS Transaction ? Guess what ? You got new task in your job to witness one more extra, and if you don't like it, you don't have to be a witness, because you're not helping the community if you are not doing your job.

I'm simple in explanations, no need for wraps, just logic and sense.

Cheers,

Luci

365

1) Implementing a virtual machine (like Ethereum’s’ Virtual Machine) into Graphene.
Once created, it will allow each user to produce smart contracts that work with assets and Smartcoins. The mechanisms of ICOs, trusted systems for the payments of dividends, and hosting various games/shares/lotteries, are examples of possible, future business cases.
By combining the strengths of the two platforms (the flexibility of ETH Smartcontracts and the speed/throughput of BitShares), they will get the symbiosis of the advantages and eliminate the weaknesses of these two platforms.

As seen already, Daniel Larimer had negotiations with EOS over the past, before real launch of EOS, and he dropped them. Probably because 'mechanisms' of ETH blockchain and it's Centralized autonomy is nothing to implement from. BEOS is far better proposal than this.

2) Implementation of the Atomic Swap mechanism.
Such a mechanism will allow the exchange of funds from one blockchain (Bitshares) to another (bitcoin, as the first), without any participation from third parties. In this case, BTS, MPA (bitUSD), and UIA can be used as bitshares funds.
Given the fact that there is only one real decentralized exchange, the ability to enter it from other blockchains, without any risks (technical and regulatory), and the participation of third parties (gateways), creates huge economic potential for the platform and the cryptocurrency economy.

You are fun :) If you can provide corporate developer estimate with stages/descriptions/proposal of actual integration of Atomic Swap to Bitshares, I would made entire Bitshares to vote for this. But since we both know that you don't have idea or clue how it can be done actually or its going to work, and when it's going to work, let's drop it as well.

3) Creation of Fee Backed Asset.
The idea of creating the FBA was proposed back in 2015, but was never implemented. (http://docs.bitshares.org/bitshares/user/fba.html)

In addition to implementing the mechanisms for automatic dividends distribution, it is proposed to discuss additional options for managing fees (the ability to impose payments on the issuer, change the fee rules for creating/closing the order, so that the person who closed the order pays 100% of the fees or 50/50).
It would create more Chaos on already chaotic market we are running here. If it's not done since 2015. it shouldn't be left alone completely.

- Now, someone mentioned BEOS and how it's all cool, and should be STARTING EARLY DEVELOPMENT AS FROM NOW! Being part of Steem and Bitshares Blockchain, i've seen in both that Daniel had serious issues when he originally wrote both blockchains and launched them. Steem had 6 hardforks before blocks really start being written and "fully functional", so lets put it this way:

THERE IS NO WAY THAT ANYONE REASONABLE WILL GO TO 3RD PRODUCT of 2 SEMI PRODUCTS to START WRITING NEW DEV for the PRODUCT ORIGINALLY CREATED BY SAME DEV AUTHOR, where project are still being under FIXES/ONGOING Development.

Is there any reasonable mind to bare with me on this one, please ?

Many thanks.

Lucifer.

366
Technical Support / Re: Account Access...HELP!
« on: October 29, 2017, 04:53:42 pm »
Which folder do i put the .bin file? Thanks!

If you used default download folder it's probably in Downloads folder of your Windows logged in account. If not, download locate32, index entire harddrive and search for *.bin

Otherwise Windows Search can eat your entire resources and eventually you will not find the file :)

Cheers

Luci

367
Hello,

We are planning to launch an exchange in Vietnam. We have our own local payment gateway which accept deposit and withdraw VND (Vietnam currency) via Internet Banking, VISA, MASTER... We need somebody who can intergrate our payment gateway to Bitshares Gateway so that users can convert VND to our UIA

Please send us a quotation for this job.

Thank you.

I've been doing research on forum and seems you're starting all thing from scratch inluding Bitshares full node with ui (wallet). We are currently in the process of finishing Thai localization for UI and doing tests on Kasikorn API Gateway for integrations to Bitshares, but with UIA that we've created for testing (local) soon live purpose.

If you are interested, we can discuss gateway project as Ross mentioned above through regular channels or you can PM both of us here. Anyway if you are really who you think you are (TrustPay Vietnamese payment gateway), then we are more than just interested to discuss.

Cheers,

Luci

368
Technical Support / Re: Disk space on a witness node
« on: October 29, 2017, 04:46:02 pm »
Hi, I was not able to find neither documentation nor forum discussion about Bitshares witness node disk consumption.  Witness node copies the whole chain on disk. At some point of the time in the future any HDD space on the witness node will be over. What should I do after disk is completely consumed: truncate the blockchain, start a chain with same id but from some block in the past etc.? Any links to discussions or documentation? Thank you.

There is actual no need for such thing as already explained in post above, but lets me explain in details why.

Classic offer nowadays for Cloud VPS or VPS comes with SSD of minimum 40GB to 60GB and 2GB of ram.

Entire full node with cleaned up files is 11GB.


Entire current live blockchain is 8.7GB


If you use 20GB from HDD as ramfs and still have 40 left, you can run node for next 365 days with no worries.

Cheers,

Luci.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25]