Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thul3

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 39
121
Support,every exchange as a platform should support burning platform token and mining.

Thanks, Let's push BTS onto the right track.

That's what you say over last 2 years and more and more people are leaving because of these kind of ignorant actions.
Rudex now also left mm contest.

Keep ignoring we are already cmc rank 92 .
Just a matter of time when bitshares will leave top 100 thanks to the ignorant trio

122
I can't understand the community.
They complain massivly about the abuse.
2 days ago even Stan got abused by Abit and the community united with Stan against Abits abuse.

But still they are voting for them as committee and witness.
So the abuse its their own fault.
Would they show a clear sign the abuse would stop quickly.

Even lowering the amount of votes of these 4 committee members would be a big step forward so they can't each time overpass the clear no from the other 7 committee members.

123
General Discussion / Re: [Committee] Fee schedule overhaul
« on: May 15, 2020, 12:10:21 am »
Quote
Recently there are some victims tricked into buying "fake" assets E.G. WAZIRX and ZILLIQA on chain. There was a discussion among the committee members, we think it may be a good idea to raise asset creation fee

So scammers are creating long assets names to scam because they are cheap and you want also to increase 4-char and 3-char which are completly uneffected and expensive compared to the long ones.

That makes fully sense.

124
General Discussion / Nash Exchange / non custodial wallets/trading
« on: May 07, 2020, 04:11:31 pm »
On april 24 fully licensed Nash Exchange opened non custodial trading which foreign community and many chinese are demanding for a long time.

Volume increased by x100 times at Nash since april 24th.

What new features is bitshares getting during that time ?

A market fee share ?Margin Call fee ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3017462.msg54292289#msg54292289


125
Quote
Team hour reports and code audit will be done once every 3 weeks.

where can these reports be found?

126
General Discussion / Re: 关于交易大赛的建议
« on: May 07, 2020, 09:33:37 am »
Thanks to the corruption and ignorance of these 3,4 big teams are now working on a fork of bitshares not willing to accept anymore the stagnation,corruption and centralization they enforce currently on bitshares.


They are clearly harming bitshares with their ignoracy and dictacting habbits which made most foreigners leave or support a hardfork.



Quote
最后再说下销毁的事。如果有了利润,部分销毁的话,我百分百同意。但是,没有利润,还在亏损的时候,销毁收入等于是自残手足。市面上有销毁的币一大把,有几个搞好了的?

Just have a look here.It is already so corrupt they give nothing about a proposal which has been voted in ,instead decide themself what to do with no consent based on their personal opinion.
And they are doing it in every aspect of bitshares.

In development,in committee even in group chats thanks to abit.

127
General Discussion / Re: Market making contest (main thread)
« on: May 07, 2020, 08:40:17 am »

So, which committee can answer these questions?


Quote from: binggo on March 09, 2020, 12:08:26 am

    Now i must question the Market making contest:

    1. Did the MM have checked the trade volume for so long time?or considered it as a measure of the "liquidity"?

    2. Did the MM have checked the growth rate of new effective users for so long time?or considered it as a measure of the "result"?

    3. Did the MM have a BSIP for the community to vote?or the fund can be used easily by Committee without the vote of the community?

    In a way, the MM became a joke slowly, only have expenditure,nothing gained.


I asked committee members who approve each day the MM contest to reply to your legit questions two days ago.
As you can see silence from their side.

128
General Discussion / Re: 关于交易大赛的建议
« on: May 02, 2020, 12:23:41 pm »
@bingo to answer your request about the committee point of view and providing data.


There is no discussion on committee about the MM contest.
If you make a request as committee it basicly gets ignored if it doesn't fit in the agenda of 3 people who basicly make the rules in a private wechat group(who you very often disagree with like myself)
Abit is welll aware committee members who asked to change the rules are not capable to change his script code and they are fully dependable on him for any changes.
There are also chinese committee members from CN-Vote who also fully agree on your point of view but who are also being ignored and asked me very often on wechat to support changes on the MM reward system which are very similar with your ones.(to convince Abit)

IMHO the other daily reward approving committee members are accepting the reward requests and don't question the reward system in fear of losing support and income knowing that the governance is broken.


Quote
2.有一个回购销毁的激活提案,它的资金使用优先程度高于交易大赛, 然而只有回购(回购价格也未严格按照提案内容执行),并没有销毁,这是一个事;
The 3 committee members didn't voted for it so don't expect them to execute or support that consensus as it's not fitting in their agenda.
They have been teached they are allowed to break rules and consensus with no consequences destroying the rest of ethic they had.

129
BitShares is a DEFI ready as technology. One functionality missing to yours and your owners interests such as P2P isn't really entire DEFI concept or its definition, and BitShares definitely has a lot to offer already.

Just provide paid invoices like any other normal people and that's all.

And btw warning:

Your insulting and toxic behavior has been allowed until now. Please try to communicate with the rest of people around in more sensitive and respectful manner before you hit ban here as well.

Chee®s


LOL you trying to harass me everywhere heh ?
Haven't you already being muted by admins who had enough of you and other devs making it very clear to you ?
Me not supporting you must really hurt you a lot.

Quote
Digital Lucife®, [01.05.20 08:50]
That's what am talking about. Ignorant uneducated idiot who doesn't know english or is capable of focused reading is empowered with 100m BTS to fuck me here

Digital Lucife®, [01.05.20 08:52]
+ he invested nothing or done nothing in 30 months. How I'm the bad guy ?

Attacking Alt here and at group chats as my owner and for his interest is also funny because he doesn't support the p2p lending BSIP.

But i already told you politly today to check your mental health and also told you before you won't ever get any support from me which makes you freakin out.
I blocked you on private chat a longer time ago from where you started harrassing me everywhere trying to discredit me and each time you had to run away once the foreign community joined against you.

Your community chat is already showing how much they support you with your 30 left active members mainly from beos.

Have a nice day

P.S here a quote from DL from march 14 when not supporting his workers

Quote
You have decent reputation as holder and to be this ignorant doesn't fit you

This one from april 16 trying to intimidate me thinking he knows my IP and can threaten me in any possible way.

Quote
ill find you in Poland with your nonsense blueconnect carrier

Threats are of course way way more but i guess in foreigner groups everyone knows about it.
He already threatened all gateways owner called them animals trying to force them to send their paper to him till today or they will get kicked out of bitshares.
Threats to users to get sued even for their voting behavior.
I think he has threaten already everyone on bitshares at least once.Even CN-Vote and bitcrab to get legaly kicked out of bitshares.

And somebody like that should represent bitshares in a region where exchanges are running away because of its highest restrictions like AML5 and KYC ?





130
Worker is ready and articles are fully paid.

I want to start with Forbes but am/was currently waiting for a positiv signal for altcoins so these articles would not be published without getting any significant results in a down trend
It has been almost one year.
When will be the best time to publish your articles which has costed us 18500$?

Thanks for the poor try Abit to hide your tyran actions.You are so easy to predict i just said to somebody else 30 minutes ago your(DL's) first action will be trying to discredit me asking for articles which are on hold waiting for new features on DEX.
Like i told you and others already before articles are booked and FULLY paid and were waiting for the defi on bitshares to get traction which i hoped we would have long ago.
I could publish them now but what do you want me to add in these articles ?
A non working governance system ?Dilution by some people ?No Defi ?Closed Gateways and disappeared assets?KYC ?Legal System in Slovenia and Thailand ?
Possible fork of bitshares ?

Maybe focus first on your actions which made majority of foreigners mad and today even furious willing to fork away because of your actions.
You just destroyed today the foreigner TG's group which result of your action you will see the next days from longterm bitshares members/devs who have enough of your abuse.


But since you tried to discredit me ......i hereby offer you to conact the media company diretly yourself where these articles have been ordered and fully paid where you can ask youself about the status of these articles.


Will also make a public poll where stake holder can decide if to publish these articles instantly with all the negativity you guys created or to wait till it's fixed.

131
We have no IBC and are leaking any kind of defi.
Shouldn't we first focus on these ones before we will hear there are not enough funds for it

132
General Discussion / Re: 关于交易大赛的建议
« on: April 30, 2020, 01:08:11 pm »
The MM contest is getting more and more irrelevant because of rules which basicly have been changed by a small group letting others not participate or being ignored.
That's the reason why i stopped verifying MM Contest rewards as a protest (as there are so many members and even in chinese committee demanding changes in MM contest for a very long time).

Trading pairs with EOS or ETH are completly irrelvant ,spending funds on BTS sell offers are creating big sell walls of BTS making the raise of BTS price much harder at CEXes.

MM Contest had 2 major points which got by this group destroyed.

1.Create BTC liquidity on BTC/BTS pair to make big dumps on CEX more difficult.
2.Create very liquid bitassets/USDT|BTC pair so DEX can provide strong price support on CEX when prices are moving up or strong down.

Today they only focus on volume on DEX which has completly no interactions with CEX other than adjusting prices based on CEX and dumping BTS to receive their initial coin back.

Both major points are not working.

133
Agree

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-10-bsip70


Instead of focusing on important features our core works on irrelevant BSIP's

134
topic related ?

Yes biteur lost over 50% of it's debt holders the last couple of days getting very unattractive with just 14 debt holders in total.
Once BTS price hits cny threshold i bet majority of current biteur debt will try to switch to bitCNY.

135
I guess you discredited your ability to preview market with this statement already

Quote
step 1) that Chinese have X amount of weeks to move/close their positions to CNY under the current fixed feeds.
I won't put your quotes from tg which are even more funny.


Quote
P.S. Yes Thule, on behalf of the West.
You trying to discredit me all the time on TG..Nothing new that BEOS,you and some chinese who do inside deals are trying everything now to discredit me.It's also funny it's always you running away when western community starts questioning your actions together with BEOS when trying to discredit me.So how come you claim you ask in the name of Western when you are always running away from them ?
But remember even i lose voting power it won't change anything.I raised my voice before and will continue to do it even with 1 bts voting power.
Many chinese members from CN-Vote are already starting questioning the voting decissions for your worker.
I can understand you guys don't like me to talk to them asking for a reason to support your worker or BEOS where they have no clear answer and ask in cn-votes group chat for reasoning.It must be a big pain.




Here a nice conversation with the creator of CN-Vote

bitProfessor, [17.04.20 11:16]
I don't know the current situation of CN-vote
bitProfessor, [17.04.20 11:18]
But I'm not surprised that CN-vote and beos destroyed bithares one day
bitProfessor, [17.04.20 11:19]
What did they do?
Thule the Moaning father, [17.04.20 11:19]
making inside deals with beos
bitProfessor, [17.04.20 11:19]
Ha


Quote
I voted ZAVOD as I have discussed a lot with DL, I feel the proposal is feasible, and it cost less.
So you voted for a legal represantative mainly for foreigners based on a talk with one guy .......
Did you checked the country where the represantative will be located ?It's local rules ?Legal Security ?Corruption ?enforcment power ?
Am asking because it seems you don't know Slovenia and that's why i asked ironicly the question why didn't you open your crypto company in mongolia.

Quote
You are 100% correct, and thanks for support - unfortunately we are far from agreement on general consensus as you see.

Now this is the tricky part: Stablecoin as represents peg/equivalent to its fiat brother (in terms of legal definitions around globe) and is backed by collateral (in our case BTS on-chain); -> To maintain legal around currency with no owner (apart from current committee members), we have to:

Why don't you post your statements public but only in closed chats ?
Did foreign community agreed on your centralization dictatur crap ?You run away as always ?
Come on at least post your position very clear what it means for bitshares having you as legal.
Tell openly how you plan to centralize everything ,call people who don't like kyc idiots,how you want to enforce staff on business etc ?Why do you talk about it only behind closed doors ?
How many people have you already threatened to sue or kick out of bitshares as Brand owner ?(also for their voting behavior only) .
What did you requested to social media accounts holders ?To get your approvement if they are allowed to use social media accounts about bitshares ?
You going to dictate who is allowed to promote bitshares and who not ?
Based on what ?
You clearly are mentally not able to hold such a positon with your permanent threats and abuse.


Quote
I'll give you reply to that. We all forgotten Thul3 was not b-dex when he arrived but thul369 and his activity is this:

BitUSD Debt Position with very nasty CR according to fixed price feeds (which he is so against right ?)
Selling BTS for OBITS
Trading BTS against OPEN.ETH which is dead market

and yeah, holding OPEN.BTC that doesn't work. Can we pass and just start ignoring him completely ? Maybe Alt will realize sooner or later he just had wrong pick.

You are just discrediting yourself more and more.
First of all i stated it already multiple times even years ago that i hold majority of my funds on huobi.Now more than ever because i'm a trader and you can't trade bts very activly on dex with current price feed threshold.
I stated also before that i won't put myself major coins to dex because i don't trust gateways and that's why i support ibc like majority of foreigners which you claim to represent.
To your accusation of being a bad trader even i recommend people to read your comments about trading i bought OPEN.ETH and OPEN.BTC yesterday.
It's a clear bet that these gateways will open soon as OPEN.USDT have been opened yesterday.
Of course you have no clue about it.
So buying OPEN.ETH for 1/3 of regular price is a small bet i did.
Maybe mention the amount i was willing to risk which was arround 60-70k bts for open.eth and open.btc together.
About Obits price falled from average 1 BTS to 0.1 BTS.
A clear buying opportunity if you think VPLedger will have some kind of success.

So please tell me were with your limited ability to understand trading where did i made a big mistake which would discredit me which you try permantly till today with no luck.

P.S How come the represant of western community has no support on his legal worker from foreigners?
Maybe start first collecting support from the people you claim to represant.Shouldn't be so difficult if you are implementing their demands like you claim.

And to answer your poor claim that i represent the vote of chinese.
This is incorrect.I represent with the vote my own opinion and don't belong to any group.
I always vote what i think is best for bitshares no matter if chinese,foreigners,dev's,beos or any other group.

Maybe start acting what is best for bitshares community by listening to them and filter what would be business wise a good feature or not and not following blindly instructions to safe your own benefit and position on bitshares.

You see i have no problem to get kicked out of committee or lose voting power.It won't change my actions.
That's the big diffrence between me and you.(In many peoples opinion)You always adopt the opinion from where you get most support for your own benefit or to increase your position on bitshares.

Here a chat with a high ranked chinese committee member

Quote
But on the other hand, he owns the domain and we can see it a license fee, or leasing fee or whatever alike
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
me: hey ......... any idea what chinese are thinking about legal representant ?

me:What is your opinion on that ?

Quote
Some don't know or don't care. Some know so lobbied for that worker in the past



me: digital is going to try to get the legal to his move institute

Quote
One question, if DL asks for more, will you support him?

me:
 my concern a bit is
trademark
domain
core worker
legal

All at one place



Quote
So he will be the new dictator


So even many chinese are aware of that major problem.


And i recommend digging now what DL said in closed groups what he plans to do with his legal mandate should it get approved.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 39