Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
in public chain code is law
BAIP Types
There are two kinds of BAIPs:
-An Informational BAIP describes a BitAssets design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the BitShares community, but does not propose a new feature, consensus change or any other modification. Informational BAIPs do not necessarily represent a BitShares community consensus or recommendation, so users and implementors are free to ignore Informational BAIPs or follow their advice. Examples would be best-practises or recommendations.
-A Consensus Upgrade BAIP describes any change that affects some or all BitAssets implementations, such as a parameters or price feed formula, logic and source or addition that affects the applications using BitAssets.
First BAIP has no threshold.Its being used for manipulation.
Second BAIP6 even when being legit have clearly stated it has no rights to committee funds.
You have no right to touch committee funds without getting it approved with a normal worker.
Every committee member who allows committee funds to be used in a manipulative way won't get my support and i'm sure will lose support of many other people.
It was made clear in BAIP6 that the threshold is a joke,being manipulated and that BAIP has no power to claim any funds but can only be used for changing parameters of bitassets.
MM needs funding which is totaly out of scope of a BAIP even when the BAIP threshold would be legit.
Current BAIP threshold is at 350 million votes.Something like that can't be taken serious.
It's nothing else as a indirect money transfer to bitcrab.
Bitcrab doesn't pay a single cent for that shit and receives 80% of the collected fee's.GDEX is currently even not the biggest gateway with most volume.
Bitassets are irrelevant since they are still under thresholds value.
So all spending will mainly go directly to GDEX.
Clearly a conflict of interest trying to selfbenefit from reserve pool / committee funds .
BAIP has by defenition NO POWER to claim any funds to be used only adjusting parameters for bitassets
If committee uses funds for BAIP6 it will also need to fund any other worker which is above BAIP threshold on that logic.
worker proposal fit the case that need automatically transfer funds from reserve pool to applicant's account, not the usage of committee managed funds.
committee has the power to manage committee-controlled parameters and use committee managed funds, based on necessary voting.
and this Ordering Mining is open to all gateways.
the same as you are.... but you are dump without money ... LOLObviously. They're dumb scammers, breaking the network comes naturally to them.
do not support this, it will hurt a big group one more time.
to optimize the system, firstly need to find a chance to lower the USD threshold to be equal to that of CNY.
Now you accept a decline feed to 0.154. After a while, CEX will draw prices even lower and you will accept another reduction in the bitCNY feed. And then, by the same logic, one more and one more. This dependence on fictitious CEX prices leads to dependence on the CEX.
I am going to spend my time and write to each account that has a margin position in bitCNY, vote for raising the BAIP threshold, and set as proxy the account that votes against this initiative to reduce the bitCNY feed. I do not want to watch how CEX takes my money by killing bitshares as its direct competitor.
How about raising the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts？if you make this proposal，i will support you to raise the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts！That's a very exciting thing!
You misunderstood me. I do not want to increase the feed price of the bitCNY. I want to leave it at the same level - 0.22 BTS/bitCNY. The BAIP threshold is just value, which now amounts to about 500 million votes, which must be overcome in order for the reduce the bitCNY price feed to be accepted.
You want to keep scamming bitasset holders and keeping bitassets with no trust ?
That's why you want to pay dividend so people will start using again a broken token ?
Why did people left bitassets where you try them to get back with a dividend ?
You think people are so dumb to take broken bitassets in exchange for a small dividend putting their money into CN-Votes hand ?
Great joke
bit assets are not broken - feed price on CEX are fake.
Ok if CEX prices are fake and feed price are not broken are you going to send me $0.0345 per BTS in USDT when i will send you BTS ?
I can use USDT to pay my bills.
Please also contact magicwallet for having fake price because i'm pretty sure they exchange bitcny to real cny not based on feed price but on cex price.
Tell them they are scammers and evil to bitshares because they don't use our price feed /ironie off
I can not object to you, because the majority is on your side. Majority are mistaken and go the way that the CEX will show him. And this road to hell
Now you accept a decline feed to 0.154. After a while, CEX will draw prices even lower and you will accept another reduction in the bitCNY feed. And then, by the same logic, one more and one more. This dependence on fictitious CEX prices leads to dependence on the CEX.
I am going to spend my time and write to each account that has a margin position in bitCNY, vote for raising the BAIP threshold, and set as proxy the account that votes against this initiative to reduce the bitCNY feed. I do not want to watch how CEX takes my money by killing bitshares as its direct competitor.
How about raising the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts？if you make this proposal，i will support you to raise the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts！That's a very exciting thing!
You misunderstood me. I do not want to increase the feed price of the bitCNY. I want to leave it at the same level - 0.22 BTS/bitCNY. The BAIP threshold is just value, which now amounts to about 500 million votes, which must be overcome in order for the reduce the bitCNY price feed to be accepted.
You want to keep scamming bitasset holders and keeping bitassets with no trust ?
That's why you want to pay dividend so people will start using again a broken token ?
Why did people left bitassets where you try them to get back with a dividend ?
You think people are so dumb to take broken bitassets in exchange for a small dividend putting their money into CN-Votes hand ?
Great joke
bit assets are not broken - feed price on CEX are fake.
Now you accept a decline feed to 0.154. After a while, CEX will draw prices even lower and you will accept another reduction in the bitCNY feed. And then, by the same logic, one more and one more. This dependence on fictitious CEX prices leads to dependence on the CEX.
I am going to spend my time and write to each account that has a margin position in bitCNY, vote for raising the BAIP threshold, and set as proxy the account that votes against this initiative to reduce the bitCNY feed. I do not want to watch how CEX takes my money by killing bitshares as its direct competitor.
How about raising the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts？if you make this proposal，i will support you to raise the BAIP threshold to 10.0 bitcny/bts！That's a very exciting thing!
You misunderstood me. I do not want to increase the feed price of the bitCNY. I want to leave it at the same level - 0.22 BTS/bitCNY. The BAIP threshold is just value, which now amounts to about 500 million votes, which must be overcome in order for the reduce the bitCNY price feed to be accepted.
