301
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] btspp-witness（双语）
« on: April 11, 2019, 12:17:02 pm »
Please do a PR into reference UI with the change
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
302
General Discussion / Re: bitsharescan.com（Bitshares Blockchain Explorer feedback）
« on: April 09, 2019, 11:53:07 am »
The asset precision is missing on the overview
EDIT: never mind, its called Decimal Points
EDIT: never mind, its called Decimal Points
303
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Request] bitRUB == bitRUBLE (need to set the same parameters)
« on: April 06, 2019, 05:14:34 am »
To consider: The official ISO symbol if the russian ruble is RUB.
304
General Discussion / Re: Core Team Recommendations for HTLC Parameters
« on: April 03, 2019, 08:24:48 pm »We decided to leave the fixed operation fees as BTS to allow the Committee to adjust the variable component fee per day or fee per kilobyte in USD terms. They can also be converted to USD fees. The recommendation is the fixed component in nominal.
The fees look good, thus denoting them in different basis seems also weird to me. Anyways, thanks for the initiative!
305
General Discussion / Re: BTS & Prediction Markets, looking at Augur...
« on: April 03, 2019, 12:23:21 pm »
Anyone has a link to a prediction market website that you consider having good UX?
306
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« on: April 03, 2019, 11:47:27 am »
Looking forward to discussions on proposals and other voting related things!
307
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] - A bounty based smartcoin marketing campaign
« on: April 03, 2019, 06:35:30 am »7\ Get funded from account "smartcoin-marketing". This account is multisignatured by the committee.(two days)
I checked on-chain, the payout of that has already happen. The description of that worker is quite clear when bounty payments should happen.
@ripplexiaoshan and at all committee members: Can you please comment on that?
Please clarify. It seems that the rules of the worker have changed (through an agreement of the proposal creator and escrow), and I would kindly ask you to restate the what rules have been re-redefined and what the new rules are such that anyone can participate.
308
General Discussion / Re: Introduce CEX in governance?
« on: April 03, 2019, 05:56:24 am »
I don't think that pandora's box should be opened.
First question that comes to mind:
- who educates the CEX in the governance of the bitshares blockchain
- who educates the CEX in the proposals which might be very technical?
- who will be lobbying in terms of what to vote for and what not?
First question that comes to mind:
- who educates the CEX in the governance of the bitshares blockchain
- who educates the CEX in the proposals which might be very technical?
- who will be lobbying in terms of what to vote for and what not?
311
General Discussion / Re: Add "close long" feature?
« on: March 28, 2019, 07:28:55 pm »Note that this can be done client-side with no risk for margin call, at least in the case where you sell into the order book (i. e. as a taker only). Just wrap the required operations into a single transaction and mark the sell order as "fill-or-kill".
That assumes that you have enough buffer to do that, but it's not feasible if your buffer is small (e.g. CR 1.80) or already margin called. The bsip allows to set an order even below a margin call to close position if desired
313
General Discussion / Market fee sharing for BitAssets
« on: March 28, 2019, 08:46:32 am »
Should committee set it on bitCNY and bitUSD as incentive for referrers?
Gut feeling says they should have market fee sharing enabled as the generated BTS is minimal on a global spectrum.
Gut feeling says they should have market fee sharing enabled as the generated BTS is minimal on a global spectrum.
314
General Discussion / Re: Add "close long" feature?
« on: March 28, 2019, 08:35:54 am »
I suppose what could be easily integrated is that you are allowed to trigger a margin call of your position that has no penalty and will appear as a normal order on the order book with the price you have specified. There must be restrictions on the price to ensure that every matched order does not decrease the CR.
315
General Discussion / Re: bitusd peg
« on: March 26, 2019, 12:02:23 pm »Please voice your wishes, suggestions or ideas for the marketing worker in a constructive way, I will happily listen.
I know nothing about video games...but is there any marketing worker focused on this sector?
It seems that 3 second block times would be perfect for their use?
https://www.cryptonewsz.com/blockchain-boom-in-the-virtual-games-divisions-trending-now-more-than-ever/12434/
Also I know there is a bounty program for acquiring exchange listings..
Was anyone responsible for today's BTS listing on Upbit Exchange (S. Korea) ? or are they just smart operators?
https://coingape.com/bitshares-bts-fusion-fsn-flash-rise/
I don't have games in the focus at the moment. I think those short-term click adventures are all focusing on EOS atm
