361
Technical Support / Re: Nginx 404 Error
« on: January 21, 2019, 11:51:00 am »
And what is your question now? 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
362
Random Discussion / Re: Its quiet around here
« on: January 20, 2019, 07:40:43 pm »
Beet and UI, plus finalizing Infrastructure worker
363
General Discussion / Re: bitusd peg
« on: January 12, 2019, 11:51:08 pm »
Have a look here, available since last release
https://wallet.bitshares.org/#/asset/USD
There is a new section in asset details that shows collateral bids, including doing a bid.
https://wallet.bitshares.org/#/asset/USD
There is a new section in asset details that shows collateral bids, including doing a bid.
364
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proposal for committee to create 6x new *REFUND* workers
« on: January 10, 2019, 12:21:00 pm »
365
General Discussion / Re: When Bitshares is reloading
« on: January 07, 2019, 02:33:40 pm »
Please use one of the other explorers
http://bts.ai/
or
http://bitshares-explorer.io
There are more if those have not what you are looking for
http://bts.ai/
or
http://bitshares-explorer.io
There are more if those have not what you are looking for
366
General Discussion / Re: Principles of options trading on the Bitshares Exchange
« on: January 07, 2019, 01:53:00 pm »
From where I stand, you can lock both until relation to the hack is cleared
367
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [BSIP Draft] Managed Vesting Balances, and Savings Account
« on: January 04, 2019, 07:22:59 am »
Discussion moved to https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/136
368
General Discussion / Re: Option on the Bitshares Exchange. CALLCNY05MARCH19
« on: December 31, 2018, 12:03:33 pm »The issuer needs to appear hear and explain his ties to the OL hack and explain the on-chain truth.
Please refrain from further advertising this until then.
The Issuer has no relation to the OL hack.
You can get acquainted with the history described by me above and draw your own conclusions. Sorry, I can add nothing more to this.
In my opinion, the money stolen from OL should rather be sought in the OL itself. (only my opinion)
Please see clockwork remarks. I also don't understand what exactly you tried to explain, please reformulate.
369
General Discussion / Re: Option on the Bitshares Exchange. CALLCNY05MARCH19
« on: December 31, 2018, 10:47:26 am »
The issuer needs to appear hear and explain his ties to the OL hack and explain the on-chain truth.
Please refrain from further advertising this until then.
Please refrain from further advertising this until then.
370
Русский (Russian) / Re: Опцион на Бирже Bitshares. CALLCNY05MARCH19
« on: December 31, 2018, 09:42:05 am »371
General Discussion / Re: Option on the Bitshares Exchange. CALLCNY05MARCH19
« on: December 31, 2018, 09:41:31 am »
@Neych
Please comment on Alex's remark
Please comment on Alex's remark
372
General Discussion / Re: Proxies, Please Explain To Shareholders Your Plans For Recollateralization
« on: December 30, 2018, 06:39:36 am »
@armin
Do you have suggestions that facilitate to force the margin call to be eaten and debt positions increase their MCR?
Do you have suggestions that facilitate to force the margin call to be eaten and debt positions increase their MCR?
373
General Discussion / Re: Why Need BSIP For Everything?
« on: December 30, 2018, 06:36:36 am »
I agree that witnesses have the freedom with what, they are able to feed within their own rationalization.
Any witness must be able to justify their actions, and if they can't, risk being voted out.
The BSIP42 approach would also have been possible without the BSIP, but the BSIP42 allowed, or even more ordered them to do the experiment.
In general anything that can't be decided upon ad-hoc can be decided with a BSIP, in that sense the witnesses asked the shareholders if the witnesses risk being voted out if they change MSSR. I would still see the option that a witness feeds another parameter and provides justification for it, with the risk of being voted out. A BSIP is ultimate means of justification.
Any witness must be able to justify their actions, and if they can't, risk being voted out.
The BSIP42 approach would also have been possible without the BSIP, but the BSIP42 allowed, or even more ordered them to do the experiment.
In general anything that can't be decided upon ad-hoc can be decided with a BSIP, in that sense the witnesses asked the shareholders if the witnesses risk being voted out if they change MSSR. I would still see the option that a witness feeds another parameter and provides justification for it, with the risk of being voted out. A BSIP is ultimate means of justification.
374
Meta / Re: Spam Bots
« on: December 24, 2018, 08:19:35 pm »
Can you put accounts with 0 posts not logged in for a year on "must be reappeared" state? How many accounts like that are there?
375
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Bitshares UI Renewal
« on: December 21, 2018, 03:27:37 pm »
A quick summary of the ongoings in the BitShares UI worker
https://whaleshares.io/bitshares/@sschiessl/the-bitshares-ui-worker
The worker is currently inactive, which effectively means the development is stopped due to lack of funds. Please have a read, and if you like the latest progress please consider voting for it!
https://whaleshares.io/bitshares/@sschiessl/the-bitshares-ui-worker
The worker is currently inactive, which effectively means the development is stopped due to lack of funds. Please have a read, and if you like the latest progress please consider voting for it!
