that commit mainly changes the warning/skip levels ets...

seems to be a bigger issue in play here..

Does it work for you?

Quote from: clockwork on April 03, 2018, 02:00:32 pm

Quote from: Customminer on April 03, 2018, 01:38:49 pm

What's your planned price feed publishing strategy? Would you consider publishing price feeds for the Hertz smartcoin if provided the ability to do so?

Initial plan is to publish feeds for most major bitFIAT pairs along with bitSILVER/bitGOLD/bitBTC in 10 minute intervals.

Would def like to publish feeds for Hertz as well as I like the concept.

For anyone else also reading, I am very interested in supporting new and inventive smartcoin concepts by publishing price feeds.

I've given your witness account permission to publish price feeds for the hertz smartcoin, you don't need to wait till you're an active witness to join the active pool of hertz price feed publishers.

Thanks 

ok...was planning on working on price feeds over the next few days (got the next week off work) so should add it soon

I will vote for this worker so that it can receive funds.
Two weeks after it received funds, I will remove my vote for a subsequent report to convince me it is a good idea.

I pretty much agree with this and will follow the same process

I can't see you in the witness list.

Currently at position 41...

Unless you're using the previous release of the wallet which had some display issues on votable objects...In which case update your client

Hello everyone,

Now that the voting has been fixed again in the UI, please consider voting for my witness: clockwork

Thank you

congrats

Quote from: pc on March 22, 2018, 09:49:55 pm

Quote from: xeroc on March 22, 2018, 12:33:38 pm

Assuming that the BBF applied for that hackathon, what reasons would there be for Binance to
not fork the BitShares Code and instead use the existing blockchain?

* forking is not trivial
* skilled and experienced (!) developers are hard to find
* we have an existing ecosystem (community, users) that can't be forked so easily
* BTS already has value, development of codebase basically pays for itself

IMO we have much to gain and little to lose from applying.

I completely agree with you.

I would add / explicit some points:

  - Bootstrapping a truly decentralized / resilient community is hard and expensive (marketing to find witnesses, organize the governance, build trust...)
  - Building a decentralized exchange when you are a centralized company has no meaning (even more if you are the unique gateway). They will waste a lot of time and effort to convince others to join. If decentralization really matters to them, it is smarter to join Bitshares platform.
  - They will benefit of our worldwide decentralized infrastructure for free.
  - They get closed source third party applications like cryptofresh, bts.ai, ... for free
  - They will benefit of existing and future liquidity like bitspark, reserve fund, and other gateway bring
  - They will be able to list to existing smart assets (bitXXX, hero, Hertz, bittwenty/bittwentix, nasdaq,...) and attract their volume for free
  - They will benefit directly from the Bitshares (DAC/Financial Platform) marketing effort, and indirectly from other business marketing.
  - Development effort could become a revenue instead of a cost! (= worker proposal).
  - The development effort and cost is mutualized with all the others participants.
  - Building open source / decentralized software is really different than doing a closed source centralized software, you need the (really rare) appropriate skills and experience on open source development, blockchain/event based systems and decentralization.
  - By applying Bitshares community show their will to accept them in the community. It is not a wise move to fork a project that share the same goal as you and propose collabration, you fork because you have different ideas.
  - They should worry about getting more time to focus on AML / KYC / tax compliance, not rebuilding what already exists.
  - They already have the bridge between the dex and their cex

I think we should show them how they could setup their BNB token with the example of cyrptobridge or obits.
It can also be the opportunity to write an open source public example on how to build a deposit/withdraw gateway.

Imho getting a big influence is currently not so costly. You don't want to own too much anyway (this will kill the decentralized aspect). 30% should be the high cap. If you are active and big, many poeple will follow you (as a proxy, or vote in your direction). So 200M BTS should be enough. You should be able to get them with 30M-40M dollars max in current market conditions, which is nothing for a serious company.

I think blockchain industry is currently too fragmented, the future will be made of merges and acquisitions not forks. It is just a matter of time to see massive takeover bids on Bitshares.

I think we should apply for the contest. Bitshares as a financial platform have been made exaclty for that.  If we don't win we should learn why and fix the issue.
Maybe it worth a community vote to see if everyone agree we should make some efforts on that direction, as this could have a major impact for the users, but also for existing business. I'm very curius to know the position of existing gateways on the topic...

Do we know why they state "Currently, decentralized exchanges are inefficient and difficult to operate for the average user."? What is their level of knowledge on Bitshares? I hope they did some research before starting this kind of project...

Once again, I agree with all the pros and the reasoning why Binance could do this.

However, I insist that there is NO way they do it without complete control over the parameters (e.g. network transaction fee etc.) which means over 51% committee.

At least if I was in their shoes, there is no way I'd embark on such a massive business venture, change my business model and move my operations to an exchange where I don't control the actual fees.

Quote from: abit on March 20, 2018, 10:44:10 am

Quote from: Sshadow on March 20, 2018, 07:31:49 am

I used a combination of this for setting up my nodes http://docs.bitshares.org/integration/exchanges/step-by-step.html and this for getting me going as a witness http://docs.bitshares.org/tutorials/witness-create.html

I have looked but haven't had any luck. Do you know of a way to do this with Apache?

Are you looking to run a node for your own use, or a web wallet service, or an exchange-like service, or what else? This may help us get you the most helpful info.

You've mentioned "site", so I guess you're going to run web wallet service.

The tutorials you linked don't contain info about web wallets. The link I provided has it. https://steemit.com/bitshares/@ihashfury/distributed-access-to-the-bitshares-decentralised-exchange .

Web wallet services usually don't need to run delayed nodes. That's for 3rd-party integration, e.g. exchanges and other businesses that need to observe certain transactions on the blockchain.

By the way, I don't use Apache. Wish someone else can help you if you have to use it.

Ok, so I have reconfigured everything to use Nginx. Everything looks good. I can connect via wss: etc. That guide seems a little out dated as I can't find the source file to edit to make my node default when I rebuild the UI. Nginx also behaves different from apache so I can't use the rewrites I am used to for the UI issue I fixed earlier. Any tips on those 2 issues? I am very relieved to solve the connection issue so thanks for that

I think for nginx it's as simple as:

location / {
    try_files $uri /index.html;
}