46
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Slate for *.delegate.xeroc
« on: October 01, 2014, 05:32:49 pm »
auto feeding has been setup just now,i updated the feed manually before.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
48
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股竞猜送额外10倍比特股奖励！！！
« on: September 25, 2014, 03:35:26 pm »
假如我投的交易被块1打包，第几个块才能知道我有没有中奖？
49
DAC PLAY / Re: BitShares Play RoadMap
« on: September 24, 2014, 09:25:53 am »
just take a look at the code, some questions, appreciated if could help to clarify, there is a dice game in existing code, seems the asset "DICE" is dedicated for dice game, does it mean there will be a specified asset for each game? how does the asset came into existence? just like the user issued asset in BitShares X? based on my understanding, if i am a game provider, i can issue a specified asset for my game, the player can buy my asset with BitShares Play base currency and join my game if they are interested. is that correct?
50
DAC PLAY / Re: BitShares Play RoadMap
« on: September 24, 2014, 08:54:40 am »6. 3rd developers develop and contribute/merge games.
what is the incentive for 3rd party developers to create new game in the Bitshares Play platform?
Game providers can hardcode their account rules, or collect chips fees in the games to be their income, etc. Buy all rules related to these ledge must be transparent as a part of the DAC.
Some other developer's intention may be just for fun, or want to get the reward/bounties from community/delegates.
correct me if i misunderstand, so will the Play platform abstract the game interface? such that the developer can implement the concrete game, and define the rules, e.g. the game designer can get x% commission from the game winner.
btw,where can i find the most update code for Bitshares Play? https://github.com/bitsuperlab/bitshares_play.git?
51
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DNS在哪里买啊？
« on: September 24, 2014, 08:38:04 am »
为什么你们给DNS估价这么低？这么低的价格，我宁愿拿筹码去拍域名也不卖。
52
DAC PLAY / Re: BitShares Play RoadMap
« on: September 24, 2014, 08:30:36 am »6. 3rd developers develop and contribute/merge games.
what is the incentive for 3rd party developers to create new game in the Bitshares Play platform?
53
KeyID / Re: [DNS] Advanced user testnet #3
« on: September 24, 2014, 07:02:12 am »
unable to connect to test netowork,seems no available seed node
55
General Discussion / Re: Beyond Bitcoin Mumble Server Now Up
« on: September 18, 2014, 02:20:56 pm »
is the Mumble Server infor still valid?i can not connect to the server with above infor
56
General Discussion / delegate alecmenconi,please come in here
« on: September 14, 2014, 03:53:49 pm »
seem the server time of your delegate node is incorrect, which cause 3 delegates missing block at last 3 rounds, please check and update your server NTP service accordingly if necessary.
57
General Discussion / Re: Is Anyone Still Holding Bitcoin?
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:45:48 am »
have sold all my btc to buy btsx :-)
58
General Discussion / Re: BTSX 0.4.13-RC1 was just posted by DAC Sun
« on: September 09, 2014, 07:54:19 pm »
done
59
KeyID / Re: Test network #2 - still advanced users only
« on: September 08, 2014, 03:08:13 am »
my client got stuck at block 10605, problem persists even delete the data and re-syn, seems attempt to switch to fork failed according to the following log.
Quote
b85f5e3c84cca4","21773f2c5598d983c6e31b0d0ef0d56c600c09e8","83bdba6fcd9f58dbf4a6ac5e87fb3086dd59e4f8","2f1cb0475b2da4ec68813c5712c8a88030a23048","9e6076052ccad93ee0b9fe9919207e428c04ab86","301123bb55fbffe441909e73fa89317a747431e5","d789b47dcc3d3c1c94c73525b2d7163ad689ce78"] chain_database.cpp:938
20140908T031050.522563 th_a:process_backlog_of_sync_blocks switch_to_fork ] extend 301123bb55fbffe441909e73fa89317a747431e5 chain_database.cpp:557
20140908T031050.523086 th_a:process_backlog_of_sync_blocks extend_chain ] error applying block: 30021 invalid_delegate_signee: invalid delegate signee
{"expected_delegate.id":99}
th_a chain_database.cpp:692 verify_header
{"block_data":{"previous":"d789b47dcc3d3c1c94c73525b2d7163ad689ce78","block_num":10606,"timestamp":"20140907T233438","transaction_digest":"c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0","next_secret_hash":"d3475560442315e4954785ed848cffc083db70c9","previous_secret":"ad4f3dda19eedd4ef54c5e6e89c46714b0c6385b","delegate_signature":"20ee4bbbddb589536158c691f3aa13bf90f3388610867bbd44958f3faaf886adca7b8f5eea46ff6688efd61d9d259adca178cbbd3f33b0f5784a9149299431dafc","user_transactions":[]}}
th_a chain_database.cpp:693 verify_header chain_database.cpp:898
20140908T031050.670073 th_a:process_backlog_of_sync_blocks push_block ] attempt to switch to fork failed: 30021 invalid_delegate_signee: invalid delegate signee
\
60
KeyID / Re: Test network #2 - still advanced users only
« on: September 08, 2014, 02:26:45 am »
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
.....
a lot of above msg keep printing on screen when execute the command? can we disable it ?
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
storing balance record in pending_chain_state with id: KEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
.....
a lot of above msg keep printing on screen when execute the command? can we disable it ?
