Quote from: Harvey on December 31, 2013, 07:49:35 pm

Quote from: logxing on December 31, 2013, 05:10:30 pm

有意见指出3I有权利使用自身拥有的6万个pts参与AGS的捐赠，从而自身也获得一部分AGS。

这个问题我是这样看的：

第一。逻辑上，关于ags的募资，3I是被捐赠对象，如果他自身也参与，那他同时也是捐赠者。对于一般意义上的募捐而言，不应该出现捐赠者和被捐赠者是同一主体的情形，尤其是ags这种涉及利益冲突的情形。所以我认为3I不应该自己参与ags的募资，我认为3I不太可能会这样做，也没有必要这样做。

你错了

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1631.135
bytemaster:

“We apply the same rules to ourselves that we apply to everyone else.   Equal opportunity for all.    The only rule we have is that funds sent to an Angel address cannot be sent back to the Angel address (by us) and must be documented in our public spread sheet showing how the funds are spent.   In other words, our opportunity to profit from this project is EQUAL to everyone else's opportunity to profit and our sources of profit are the same as everyone else's.

All PTS that is sent to the Angel fund is spent into circulation.  If we send our mined/purchased PTS to the Angel address you will be able to see how we spend it and once we do so we will be unable to 'dump and run' without building BitShares and other DACs.  This is a very good thing for the community because we are reinvesting our 'profits in PTS' back into building the ecosystem rather than holding the PTS.

The major reason we can offer the bounties prior to fully funding AGS is because we know we will be investing 95% of our own PTS into the fund over time.  ”

了解了，从规则角度讲，公司确实可以这样做。也许不使用“捐赠”这个词比较好，这样就不至于引起明显的争议了。