Quote from: binggo on March 20, 2020, 10:16:58 am

Quote from: Digital Lucifer on March 20, 2020, 08:32:14 am

After long and productive discussion with holders from the East, we agreed that some implementations and fixes cannot wait, but we also agreed that we cannot squeeze 2 mainnet releases in 6 months worker.

As a compromise and demand for urgent deployment before actual full core worker, I'm coming here on behalf of holders and core team to present you new 2020-core-prelude mini worker

2020-core-prelude 2 months (8.7 weeks) worker

Github - English version

PDF - English version (accessible from China)

Worker is sent to Linda Tian for translation and to the escrow to go on-chain, more updates to follow.

Chee®s

Which holders from east?

Why BSIP87 is more important than BSIP77?  need some reason.

1) Everyone I was able to reach by WeChat and it's respective groups.
2) It's not that it's less important. It's more important to people with significant stake who are publicly agreeing to it and requesting it to be implemented. From the developers perspective, BSIP87 is far easier implementation that requires less time in testing over BSIP77.

Chee®s

1. En, i can't get any informations from this respective groups in any public outlet，seems they are mysterious.
2. I can't get any enough reason for BSIP87, maybe just they like it.

I think BSIP74 and BSIP77 is enough for this mini mainnet releases, maybe incloud BSIP 64, so we may make a deployment in 1 month.

Besids, BSIP74 still have some problems need to check.

Ok, they can do what they like, wish they can destroy the bitassets totally.

Best regards.

Quote from: binggo on March 19, 2020, 04:18:14 am

biteur都拉不动人，何况是波场，bts的韭菜都是比较念旧的

让孙大圣把bts买了，然后见证人再分叉，拿糖果，爽歪歪

没发现波场很适合做bts系统吗？速度够快，链上有usdt，不用担心流动性，可以死保稳定币的稳定；bts复制系统而且可以带杠杆爆拉波场（这个动机很纯，懂的人自然懂）；代币集中度很高，便于系统治理。

另外软分叉过去的币可以做治理货币，而不是抵押代币，参照MKR即可。

就差个引路人了。

即使有USDT做抵押来提供流动性，我想还是改变不了赌徒的本性，现在都打折打到这种程度了，都不想着把债仓平掉而是死命加杠杆，所以另有其因。

flowing into the Ocean

So, which committee can answer these questions?

Now i must question the Market making contest：

1. Did the MM have checked the trade volume for so long time？or considered it as a measure of the "liquidity"?

2. Did the MM have checked the growth rate of new effective users for so long time？or considered it as a measure of the "result"？

3. Did the MM have a BSIP for the community to vote？or the fund can be used easily by Committee without the vote of the community？

In a way, the MM became a joke slowly, only have expenditure，nothing gained.

Currently bitRUBLE is best committee-owned MPA, as it's retain original MCR=1.75 and MSSR=1.1.

I think you make a big mistake.





and we have three black bitasset which retain original MCR=1.75 and MSSR=1.1.

Quote from: bitcrab on March 15, 2020, 12:06:05 pm

Quote from: 时光旅行机 on March 15, 2020, 10:14:43 am

daI这把黑天鹅目前看处理的不错，dai的汇率 也只是短暂脱钩而已，没有经验 可以学习一下吗

不错啥呀，因为清算规则问题和网络拥堵问题，Maker要拿出500万美元来填坑。要靠卖MKR来筹集。
而且一堆爆仓者债仓的抵押物都被以极低的价格卖掉，最后债仓被清算得毛都不剩，让许多竞标者捡了大便宜。
花这种代价去维持DAI的稳定，有啥意义啊。
Maker发生的事情，让我更坚定地认为BTS现在走的路是正确的。

十分同意，目前bts的一些改革措施和走的路的确是救了整个社区，Maker这次处理其实很失败

我想你并不懂社区是什么？而且这些称不得上是什么改革与走的路，也没有救所谓的谁，所有这些只不过是一只鸵鸟把头埋在了沙子里，天真而且傻。

Maker的这次处理是怎么回事我想你也不清楚, 如果没有搞清楚可以先去搞的清清楚楚。

某些事物会在挫折中不断壮大，某些事物会在挫折中不断萎缩，甚至于消亡。

市值很直观, 不行就再去看活跃用户数。

有些时候我是真很难理解，是不懂呢还是装不懂呢，还是傻呢...这个问题一直困惑了很长时间，不过现在我明白了。

The painful history of BTS has taught us a lot, we realized that it is impossible to make smart coin peg exactly at any time,  and we need to change to stop the way of pegging from hurting the whole ecosystem, measures are taken accordingly.

After the implementation of BSIP58, BSIP76, BAIP2, bitCNY and bitUSD are no longer expected as exactly pegged asset at any time. they are derivatives of BTS that can peg under some conditions, and peg off under some other conditions, they can still be used as tools of leveraging, risk controlling, arbitraging and so on. the great benefits is, the death spiral disappeared. BTS holders need not to worry that market crash will lead BTS price to 0.

I observed Maker’s behavior in the recent market crash, it behaved like BTS in old times, and due to the booming gas fee and the settlement rule of DAI, many margin called CDPs are settled in very low price, some bidders get the collaterals in very cheap price and what they paid cannot cover the debt, Maker team has to pay the gap by selling MKR. Maker team and debt position owners are both losers in this market crash.

I am glad that BTS has left this page behind, although bitCNY and bitUSD are now in big devaluation due to BSIP76, we successfully avoid the crash of BTS price, I believe not only debt position owners, but also all BTS holders would like to see this.

We expect to restore the peg of the smart coin by making BTS price be stably above the threshold, the way to get this is to increase the system income by charging from margin call, force settlement and UIA market fee, and pay public expenditures and buy back BTS using the accumulated fees,  if all the things going well, we can get features for this in release 4.0.

I hope the ones who always call BSIP58, BSIP76 and BAIP2 “market manipulation” can update their idea, we are just utilizing creative solution.

FOOLISH AND STUPID WORDS.

掩耳盗铃与鸵鸟。

堵上耳朵就听不到声音了？头埋到沙子里屁股漏到外面就以为能够躲过危机？不想去真正的解决问题，却学会了怎么一味的去逃避。

You didn't have any ability to solve the risk, so destroy the smartcoin become your choice.

creative solution

？God，please help！These words winded me，i love these words so much！

“以管窥天，以蠡测海，以莛撞钟，岂能通其条贯，考其文理，发其音声哉。"

You are too young, too native.