856
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股的未来，交易所还是稳定币？
« on: November 07, 2019, 02:51:58 am »我没有觉得强清需要改变，而是觉得喂价逐步上涨就行了。
所以说，逻辑逻辑，事情并不是你觉得是就是。
水流不出去，就只会在内盘形成堰塞效应，后果自然是大家清来清去，互相割。
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
所以说，逻辑逻辑，事情并不是你觉得是就是。
水流不出去，就只会在内盘形成堰塞效应，后果自然是大家清来清去，互相割。
857
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股的未来，交易所还是稳定币？
« on: November 07, 2019, 01:51:44 am »交易大赛仅仅只是短期刺激市场而已，长期价格的决定因素是供需关系。如何减少市场上BTS的供应量是目前的问题。虽然锁定喂价不爆仓了，但是强清也是从抵押单释放BTS到市场上。
这是强请机制的缺陷而已，想要立竿见影的办法吗？满仓哥我给你几个。
第一步：内盘价格做到喂价权重里，同时设立最高价与最低价，防止内盘价格作妖。
(1+P)*外盘指数价格<=喂价<= (1.05+P）×外盘深度指数价格
喂价=内盘深度加权中间价*权重+外盘深度指数价格×（1+P）*权重
P>=0
当锁喂价时，外盘指数价格=锁的喂价，内盘价格做小权重
当外盘价格>=锁定的喂价，外盘价格=外盘指数价格，内盘价格权重平衡
第二步：提高强清补偿至少到4%。
第一步需要喂价人改脚本，第二步需要理事会投票改参数。
至于为什么需要这样做，现在我比较懒的解释。
这只是开头的两步，后面的需要紧跟着上抵押线与爆仓线分离。
858
General Discussion / Re: Lack of development leaves no reason for investors to buy BTS
« on: November 07, 2019, 01:07:03 am »So you're saying that by not developing what investors want they won't invest? So why would they invest if there is no development to develop that which they want?
I agree with OP, a lack of development will lead to stagnation and decaying software quality. If HackTheDex runs out of funding then there are always external security groups who pay much more for zero days & wouldn't hesitate to use them.
The combination of hackthedex and bitshares-ui development resolved multiple critical vulnerabilities in the last year which had they fallen into the wrong hands could have led to ransomware & worms speading through the network with precision and minimal input by the victim.
It looks like you want to argue for something and want prove your opinion is right, that's very interesting.
Quote
So you're saying that by not developing what investors want they won't invest? So why would they invest if there is no development to develop that which they want?
I think you can do some deeper thinking about your words, and consider why, why, why.
and sombody can tell me where the development fund come from of these coin, BTC，LTC?
and how old is BTS？
The reserve pool belongs to the holder of bts, how to use it determined by votes, the holder is very clearly know what they do, every penny needs to count, they will fund what they think should develop，not who order them.
Oh, maybe you are one holder of bts and didn't get what your want, this just show you didn't hold enough bts to express your opinion.
Do you want to be stronger？hold more bts.
Quote
This is a wildly inaccurate estimate, way over 2x the real amount of funding.
If you think the number is a wildly inaccurate estimate, en, can I trouble you to statistics the accurate amount.
https://www.bitshares.foundation/worker/
Lack of development will not stop investors to buy, the truth is very simple, investors like to buy BTC/LTC/BCH/BSV/XRP/XLM/DOGE/blah, blah, blah... en，they even like to buy more shitcoin... en.
and please calm down!
859
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 最低喂价停滞阻碍了BTS价格继续上行
« on: November 07, 2019, 12:26:48 am »目前抵押的BITCNY可以流到交易所的，况且这不重要，重要的是怎么阻止抵押单流向市场，减少资金池里的BTS想市场释放量。总而言之，每天向市场供应的BTS越少，价格会越高，假如向市场供应的BTS为零，那么BTS的价格会怎样？当然，这是理想真空，因为见证人工资还是要给的。一个良性循环，BTS 价格越高，那么见证人的工资以BTS结算的就越少，也就是资金池流出的BTS会越少。所以,bts的价格越低，生态就越恶劣，生存问题就越大，价格越高，生态就越好。很多人还是对控制喂价不太理解。影响价格的决定因素是市场供需，锁定喂价就是锁定抵押单不再流向市场，减少市场BTS供应量，从而影响价格。那么。喂价逐步走高，会锁定更多的bts，这对BTS 的价格长期走高是很明显的事实。不要总觉得控制喂价就是人为操纵价格。说白了，玩家看到价格不断上涨，才会投资，如果价格总是下跌，玩家只会逃走。
满仓哥有时候你需要拓展一下思维: 如果抵押的资金可以顺畅的流到外盘会发生什么样的情况？！是什么把水的流动性拦住了？！
满仓哥你应该考虑清楚与仔细了再回答，一些东西你看似不重要，恰恰是最重要的东西，而你看似重要的东西，恰恰并不重要。
再者，逻辑很重要。
860
General Discussion / Re: Lack of development leaves no reason for investors to buy BTS
« on: November 06, 2019, 01:04:33 pm »
I don't think so, the investor don't buy not because of lack of development, but these development didn't give what they want.
We have fund almost 20M bitcny to the development in this year, now we need to check the result of these development.
If no pay no development, BTC shouldn't survive.
Every business want build on the bts, should have their own nodes to serve their customer, we only provide the basic and what we can afford service.
We have fund almost 20M bitcny to the development in this year, now we need to check the result of these development.
If no pay no development, BTC shouldn't survive.
Every business want build on the bts, should have their own nodes to serve their customer, we only provide the basic and what we can afford service.
861
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 最低喂价停滞阻碍了BTS价格继续上行
« on: November 06, 2019, 06:53:36 am »很多人还是对控制喂价不太理解。影响价格的决定因素是市场供需，锁定喂价就是锁定抵押单不再流向市场，减少市场BTS供应量，从而影响价格。那么。喂价逐步走高，会锁定更多的bts，这对BTS 的价格长期走高是很明显的事实。不要总觉得控制喂价就是人为操纵价格。说白了，玩家看到价格不断上涨，才会投资，如果价格总是下跌，玩家只会逃走。
满仓哥有时候你需要拓展一下思维: 如果抵押的资金可以顺畅的流到外盘会发生什么样的情况？！是什么把水的流动性拦住了？！
862
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 最低喂价停滞阻碍了BTS价格继续上行
« on: November 06, 2019, 12:04:38 am »
这只是其中的原因之一，其它的因素你没有讲出来。
喂价过高的结果是智能货币发行供过于求，导致智能货币贬值。你会看到的是BTS对BTC和法币贬值，你看到的BTS对bitCNY升值的原因是bitCNY对法币贬值了。很多人还是对控制喂价不太理解。影响价格的决定因素是市场供需，锁定喂价就是锁定抵押单不再流向市场，减少市场BTS供应量，从而影响价格。那么。喂价逐步走高，会锁定更多的bts，这对BTS 的价格长期走高是很明显的事实。不要总觉得控制喂价就是人为操纵价格。说白了，玩家看到价格不断上涨，才会投资，如果价格总是下跌，玩家只会逃走。
863
中文 (Chinese) / Re: [marketing]【区分·了不起的数字资产交易所】对话BTS 比特股理事、GDEX创始人巨蟹
« on: November 05, 2019, 03:09:18 am »
顶再看！！！
864
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 怎么办，我已经没有了持币的信心了，换持其它币的都笑了。离开的人再也不碰BTS。
« on: November 05, 2019, 02:53:20 am »
865
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 怎么办，我已经没有了持币的信心了，换持其它币的都笑了。离开的人再也不碰BTS。
« on: November 05, 2019, 12:58:51 am »
甘少，熬不住，就割，多说其它无用，割了换其它币你也可以笑的很开心，天天何必跟自己这么过不去?
年前咒怨到现在，何苦如此？
别一个个帖子都复制粘贴一样的内容，何必？
我不已经说了，打不过可以投靠过去，还能讨一身富贵不是。
年前咒怨到现在，何苦如此？
别一个个帖子都复制粘贴一样的内容，何必？
我不已经说了，打不过可以投靠过去，还能讨一身富贵不是。
866
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股的未来，交易所还是稳定币？
« on: November 04, 2019, 08:26:21 am »从最近的交易大赛数据看，走交易的路子是对的。慢慢的会有人发现内盘深度还可以，就会充值来交易，同时网关能赚到钱，就会更有动力开发更好的客户端给用户，那么外部用户也会越来越多，形成正循环。
我们是否可以做这么一个一级市场与多签钱包.
1.一级市场的UIA全部统一名称，什么网关的BTC在一级市场里都直接显示是BTC;
2. 网关想加入一级市场的就需全部转存对应资产及发行权到这个多签钱包里，再由多签钱包审核批准发行对应的网关UIA,
个人直接充多签钱包的, 多签钱包审核发行一级市场的UIA;
3. 一级市场可以映射加入多签钱包的网关资产的网关市场订单;
4. 想被映射的网关市场必须满足条件2;
5. 符合条件的网关资产都可以在此一级市场交易.
这样的好处就是:
不影响网关自己搞生产;
有利于内盘资产的统一辨识度，降低学习台阶;
有利于提高各自的深度与流通性;
多签钱包有利于提高信任度;
当然也还有许多问题需要解决.
867
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 最低喂价停滞阻碍了BTS价格继续上行
« on: November 04, 2019, 04:58:48 am »本来就不应该设置最低喂价。设置最低喂价的结果不但不会使BTS价格上涨还会提前让bitCNY对法币的价格严重下跌（实际上已经在发生），这是满仓BTS者通过手中的选票拉bitCNY执有者陪葬。BTS在内斗和规则修改中逐渐下跌。既然BTS和bitCNY都会下跌，只要不傻都会换其它币，用户正在大量离开，目前BTS:CNY日活用户跌到200左右。
真觉得BTS价格低估了就用BTC买入BTS，用输不起的心态修改规则最终只会让BTS阴跌。
赞同。说白了这帮人就是被套傻了，不敢也不愿意接受价格暴跌的事实，妄图通过修改规则来致使自己不被继续爆仓。
当年某汪同学与你们的想法如出一辙，与其打不过还不如投靠他们换得一身富贵
868
General Discussion / Re: Shorting Attack Protection?
« on: November 03, 2019, 02:05:40 pm »I don't believe either party regarding the 'short attack'. I don't hold my BTS in CEX nor do I know anyone that uses ZB to store BTS, if you're willing to publicly accuse ZB of wrongdoing then surely the onus is on you? Seems half measured.ZB has outright refuted these claims: https://twitter.com/ZB_Group/status/1188771828967206912?s=20
So who's lying? OP or ZB? If ZB is as corrupt as you all claim, why aren't you encouraging everyone to pull their BTS from their CEX and denouncing them more severely?
Oh, you believed ZB? That's very interesting.
Why aren't you encouraging everyone to pull their BTS from their CEX and denouncing them more severely?
So, you can do what you want to do, and believe what you want to believe.
It's very interesting about your thought, You believe it or not believe it, nobody care, if you want the true, to find out by yourself.
869
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 最低喂价停滞阻碍了BTS价格继续上行
« on: November 03, 2019, 01:56:30 pm »社区对做空者的敌意太大，规则内的做空，这个没啥可说的。可是限制做空就有点那啥了。
嗯，做到归零大家岂不都happy
，也可以满足某教主之愿规则是大多数持有者定的，做空的感觉被限制了可以不做，或者做多，对此真的是很抱歉，妨碍到做空的大爷们了！
870
General Discussion / Re: Shorting Attack Protection?
« on: November 03, 2019, 02:13:43 am »My approach against shorting attacks:
New BAIP: Dynamic price feeds based on EMAs and smartcoin metrics
Let's check it.
