46
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.6.2 Feedback
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:23:09 pm »
an UI issue
When I click a "bts:account/transfer/..." link from browser to jump into the client's transfer page. The account logo is not displayed.
It only shows when you key in the account name from the first letter.
When I click a "bts:account/transfer/..." link from browser to jump into the client's transfer page. The account logo is not displayed.
It only shows when you key in the account name from the first letter.
48
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 赠送BTSBOTS股票：BTSBOTS.EXCH
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:11:38 pm »在auction页面的使用说明还不是很明白改了一下
几点建议：
1. 要同时解释如何买，和如何卖。可以把FAQ里面的几行放过来
2. 下拉框的币种改成USD之后，后面的交易对还是CNY/BTS, 使人很迷惑。系统会按美元汇率自动换算成CNY吗？
3. 加上account logo (就是以前的机器人，现在改成方块状了)
4.price limit框里面不要用500, 要不然留空，或者动态填入当前的撮合价，这样用户可以不用每次都手动删那么多数字。
5.加上手续费的说明，用户下单前可以提示一下按他的竞价最少可以换到多少目标资产。
试用了一下还是很方便的，要把做市商搞起来啊，这样初期才会有人来交易。
1. 增加了如何买卖的提示
2. 缺省价格改为了当前推荐价格，且超出20%以上用红色高亮提示。
3. 手续费说明在FAQ中增加了。
因为下单都是按CNY定价显示的，所以下单这里改了也不好，保持现状。转入的美元等资产都是无损转换到BOTSCNY后才交易。
谢谢建议，请留下BTS帐号，赠送你一点股份略表心意
更新很快啊，加油
bts: milkmeat
49
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 赠送BTSBOTS股票：BTSBOTS.EXCH
« on: March 04, 2015, 01:33:48 am »老实说，这个跟市场的交易平台很像啊。要是市场有足够流动性，大家为啥不去市场呢。而且这个服务是从市场分流。去中心化平台优势很明显，但也有其局限性的，
我认为他们的关系是互为补充互相促进
配合网页轻钱包，在这个平台上就可以很容易的交易啦
在windows上同步钱包，简直就是噩梦。所以我现在都用mac
50
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 投票支持比特股之家，vote for www.bts-hk ！！
« on: March 03, 2015, 11:07:53 pm »
0.6.2版本怎么投票啊？
我找到www.bts-hk受托人，把拳头图标点亮，是不是就投上了？
我记得以前有个 update my vote 按钮，现在没有了？
我找到www.bts-hk受托人，把拳头图标点亮，是不是就投上了？
我记得以前有个 update my vote 按钮，现在没有了？
51
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 赠送BTSBOTS股票：BTSBOTS.EXCH
« on: March 03, 2015, 10:58:16 pm »
在auction页面的使用说明还不是很明白
几点建议：
1. 要同时解释如何买，和如何卖。可以把FAQ里面的几行放过来
2. 下拉框的币种改成USD之后，后面的交易对还是CNY/BTS, 使人很迷惑。系统会按美元汇率自动换算成CNY吗？
3. 加上account logo (就是以前的机器人，现在改成方块状了)
4.price limit框里面不要用500, 要不然留空，或者动态填入当前的撮合价，这样用户可以不用每次都手动删那么多数字。
5.加上手续费的说明，用户下单前可以提示一下按他的竞价最少可以换到多少目标资产。
试用了一下还是很方便的，要把做市商搞起来啊，这样初期才会有人来交易。
几点建议：
1. 要同时解释如何买，和如何卖。可以把FAQ里面的几行放过来
2. 下拉框的币种改成USD之后，后面的交易对还是CNY/BTS, 使人很迷惑。系统会按美元汇率自动换算成CNY吗？
3. 加上account logo (就是以前的机器人，现在改成方块状了)
4.price limit框里面不要用500, 要不然留空，或者动态填入当前的撮合价，这样用户可以不用每次都手动删那么多数字。
5.加上手续费的说明，用户下单前可以提示一下按他的竞价最少可以换到多少目标资产。
试用了一下还是很方便的，要把做市商搞起来啊，这样初期才会有人来交易。
52
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 关于增加BTS系统内高级资产的设想
« on: March 03, 2015, 10:05:53 am »
基金需要建立信用，不一定就需要100%保证金。比如可以参考现实中基金公司和银行的托管关系
基金托管人应该拥有比基金更高的信用级别。这样可以按投资操作与资产保管分开的原则，保证资金安全。
托管银行负责保证资金安全，收托管费，确保所有的资金、投资品都在账上。基金净值由银行每天公布，十大持仓按季度公布
基金公司提供资金操作策略，但不接触资金。这样基金不能随意挪用资金或伪造交易，除申购赎回的情况外，不应接触到资金和投资品。
从目前情况来看，如果投资于BitGold, BitBtc等锚定资产，也许这个托管银行能使用区块链完成
如果投资于货币基金，真实股票等资产，就只能依赖法人实体来托管了，不知道谁能成为这样一个高信用级别的托管人。
怎么用好区块链来解决实际问题，还需要不断摸索啊
基金托管人应该拥有比基金更高的信用级别。这样可以按投资操作与资产保管分开的原则，保证资金安全。
托管银行负责保证资金安全，收托管费，确保所有的资金、投资品都在账上。基金净值由银行每天公布，十大持仓按季度公布
基金公司提供资金操作策略，但不接触资金。这样基金不能随意挪用资金或伪造交易，除申购赎回的情况外，不应接触到资金和投资品。
从目前情况来看，如果投资于BitGold, BitBtc等锚定资产，也许这个托管银行能使用区块链完成
如果投资于货币基金，真实股票等资产，就只能依赖法人实体来托管了，不知道谁能成为这样一个高信用级别的托管人。
怎么用好区块链来解决实际问题，还需要不断摸索啊
53
中文 (Chinese) / Re: CNFUND中国投资基金(China Investment Fund)发布公告及基金净值公布
« on: February 25, 2015, 03:37:20 am »
建议做Bitusd或者bitEuro的余额宝理财服务。现在美元存款利率低，可以利用数字货币的高流动性做成一个息差套利产品。
bitcny的余额宝理财相比之下意义不大。
另外希望同时公布余额宝或其他货币基金的明细及纸质对账单，防止跑路。
bitcny的余额宝理财相比之下意义不大。
另外希望同时公布余额宝或其他货币基金的明细及纸质对账单，防止跑路。
55
中文 (Chinese) / 有没有人能开发一个bitcny抢红包程序
« on: February 06, 2015, 03:07:25 pm »
我看微博红包平均只要1块钱就可以收获一个关注，貌似是一个很好的推广渠道。
有没有人能开发一个微博抢bitcny红包程序，做一些推广呢？
注册一个100%受托人作为发红包基金怎么样？
有没有人能开发一个微博抢bitcny红包程序，做一些推广呢？
注册一个100%受托人作为发红包基金怎么样？
57
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 谁帮忙把这个翻译一下？
« on: February 02, 2015, 12:35:55 am »
就是一个锚定黄金的增强型指数基金
主要资产以Bitgold的方式存放，跟踪黄金的价格波动，
同时提供biggold/bitbtc的做市商交易，以期获得额外收益，另一方面为bts引入流动性
主要资产以Bitgold的方式存放，跟踪黄金的价格波动，
同时提供biggold/bitbtc的做市商交易，以期获得额外收益，另一方面为bts引入流动性
58
General Discussion / Re: Sent money to "bter" or other scam accounts? Here's how to prove what you sent.
« on: January 29, 2015, 10:58:12 pm »
BM, thank you for sharing the progress, it is a very important feature.
I just think of another option which is to support "verified account". Oppose to anonymous account, the user can optionally provide his name/address/ID and publish to the block chain. He can also invite one or more 3rd party "notary people" to endorse for the information he provided. Notary can review the photocopy/original copy, or even visit his address in person to make sure those information are real. We can apply the reputation system to both the notary and the user. So when people are doing transactions, they have confidence that they are dealing with a trustworthy party.
Is this also kind of on your road map?
I just think of another option which is to support "verified account". Oppose to anonymous account, the user can optionally provide his name/address/ID and publish to the block chain. He can also invite one or more 3rd party "notary people" to endorse for the information he provided. Notary can review the photocopy/original copy, or even visit his address in person to make sure those information are real. We can apply the reputation system to both the notary and the user. So when people are doing transactions, they have confidence that they are dealing with a trustworthy party.
Is this also kind of on your road map?
60
General Discussion / Re: Sent money to "bter" or other scam accounts? Here's how to prove what you sent.
« on: January 29, 2015, 01:34:33 pm »
Is there a technical solution to such scam from happening again?
As Bill Gates mentioned when asking why bitcoin is not good enough ( https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bill-gates-bitcoin-bitcoin-alone-not-good-enough/ )
“There’s a lot that Bitcoin or variants can do to make moving money between countries easier and getting fees down pretty dramatically. But Bitcoin won’t be the dominant system. When you talk about a domestic economy, [you must have] the idea of attributed transactions, where if you sent it to the wrong person you could actually get the transaction reversed. [And a traditional system] doesn’t have this huge fluctuation where the value of your account is going up and down by a factor of two. We need things that draw on the revolution of Bitcoin, but Bitcoin alone is not good enough.”
BitAsset fixed the problem that the fluctuation is changing too much. And we need to address the case when user really want to reverse a transaction. I can think of two solutions suppose you are transfering a large amount to others:
1. use multi-sig to protect the transfer. The exchange can hire an auditing people to review and approve any transfers. It's difficult for a person to make both destination address and auditing address wrong.
2. allow the transaction to be in "holding" state until certain blocks later. Such as bitcoin can do. The sender can withdraw the transaction during this period. But this doesn't seem to be helpful for careless people.
toast, what are the thoughts from the developer team?
As Bill Gates mentioned when asking why bitcoin is not good enough ( https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bill-gates-bitcoin-bitcoin-alone-not-good-enough/ )
“There’s a lot that Bitcoin or variants can do to make moving money between countries easier and getting fees down pretty dramatically. But Bitcoin won’t be the dominant system. When you talk about a domestic economy, [you must have] the idea of attributed transactions, where if you sent it to the wrong person you could actually get the transaction reversed. [And a traditional system] doesn’t have this huge fluctuation where the value of your account is going up and down by a factor of two. We need things that draw on the revolution of Bitcoin, but Bitcoin alone is not good enough.”
BitAsset fixed the problem that the fluctuation is changing too much. And we need to address the case when user really want to reverse a transaction. I can think of two solutions suppose you are transfering a large amount to others:
1. use multi-sig to protect the transfer. The exchange can hire an auditing people to review and approve any transfers. It's difficult for a person to make both destination address and auditing address wrong.
2. allow the transaction to be in "holding" state until certain blocks later. Such as bitcoin can do. The sender can withdraw the transaction during this period. But this doesn't seem to be helpful for careless people.
toast, what are the thoughts from the developer team?
