Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ffwong

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
46
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 2: The Real Deal
« on: June 13, 2014, 05:07:34 pm »
Now everytime I open my wallet and then type  wallet_list_unspent_balances

BALANCE                                   OWNER                     VOTE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           1000000    XTSHYSKmUfq1YMb9P7pMpajbwyn7qUJES6cT                        +bts101
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000651b93 in bts::cli::detail::cli_impl::format_and_print_result (
    this=0x158b370, command=..., arguments=..., result=...)
    at /home/ttwong/bitshares_toolkit/libraries/cli/cli.cpp:798
798                                 if (delegate_rec->name.size() > 21)



47
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 2: The Real Deal
« on: June 13, 2014, 04:57:31 pm »
Just deleted the .BitsharesXTS folder and restart everything. Now the wallet sync to the block 1495. But I still did not receive any fund previously sent by bytemaster and others (thanks anyway), even after rescan the chain. Can someone please sent me again?
Edited: Got the fund. But have another problem. ... (see next post)

{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 1495,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140613T165430",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 291,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 39.770397703977039,
  "network_num_connections": 1,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 999999735,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": null,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140613T165620",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "b0c4704bee5b8951544428447e35c24d1992b240",
  "blockchain_shares": 9999944179437,
  "network_num_connections_max": 12,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "19100114T121019",
  "wallet_version": 100
}

48
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 2: The Real Deal
« on: June 13, 2014, 04:25:40 pm »
Quote from: ffwong on June 13, 2014, 03:57:14 pm

{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 751,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140613T083415",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 290,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 18.718843469591228,
  "network_num_connections": 0,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 2892292014,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": null,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140613T160121",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "5ca9a6ed6ca1850ae6b01ab46e935390bc701e39",
  "blockchain_shares": 9999962538849,
  "network_num_connections_max": 12,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "19691231T235959",
  "wallet_version": 100
}

Is it a bug? I set a very big constant (for unlock time) when I unlocked the wallet.

49
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 2: The Real Deal
« on: June 13, 2014, 03:57:14 pm »
Quote from: sfinder on June 13, 2014, 03:32:46 pm
I run 2 clients on my 2 linux pc and this morning I found they have different blockchain_head_block_num.


Mine is stuck on block count 751. May be it is the bug mentioned by bytemaster.
This may be also the reason I did not receive the fund yet.

{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 751,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140613T083415",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 290,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 18.718843469591228,
  "network_num_connections": 0,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 2892292014,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": null,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140613T160121",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "5ca9a6ed6ca1850ae6b01ab46e935390bc701e39",
  "blockchain_shares": 9999962538849,
  "network_num_connections_max": 12,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "19691231T235959",
  "wallet_version": 100
}

50
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 2: The Real Deal
« on: June 13, 2014, 02:00:38 pm »
Please also give me some test fund for joining this dry run 2

ffwong-delegate-5   XTS819hyNrhVFkjEDrqM5sJmaTCS9qbUuTeFJkh81wogQFQWbRxQm     NO           0             
ffwong-delegate-4   XTS6sL31fo2DSrbFzwKvMbkYQx63fwES1AcfVWdLXg9pqkRPxuXzG       NO           0             
ffwong-delegate-3   XTS84LNqrGb9zhMUUUkK5FSoZWYJCBSbaovEA7q7NbAohkzTByxPN     NO           0             
ffwong-delegate-2   XTS6yjjUj4t6XZWzaF41DJgghDrxVC31XoiWwgeDfzPTcAzLkjMtk           NO            0
ffwong-delegate-1   XTS7Zm1t5sHKS9Cm7XJDTNWgzQUi2V1WoFzJDeB4PzX9cLGENjGxj     NO            0             
                             
Thanks.

51
General Discussion / Re: Delegates, start your engines!
« on: June 11, 2014, 06:13:09 pm »
I have been late for registering as initial delegate.

So I tried to register on blockchain as mentioned by ByteMaster. When I tried "wallet_account_register", it said I have insufficient fund to register (as I have zero funding).

Did anyone try register on blockchain before? Or anyway to get sufficient fund to register?


52
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Raise your hand if you would like to be an initial Delegate
« on: June 04, 2014, 04:19:05 pm »
I am interested.
Hong Kong

53
General Discussion / Re: Today, I really lose the confidence about 3I
« on: May 18, 2014, 10:18:36 am »
Quote from: Anytime on May 18, 2014, 03:53:30 am
Can anyone understand the source code written by 3I? i do not know anything about computer programming. i am really not sure if they are really working and have made a lot of progress. all i can see is that many other teams are releasing their newest products, but unitl now 3I has nothing. so if you could understand their progress really,can you share some of your confidence with me.

i am really suffering a hard time in my life. i am about 29 years old. And i haven't achieved any success or made a big money. my girlfriend dumped me a month ago, though we had a long relationship and gonna married, (at least i thought so). my bussiness (a very small bussiness and i am the only emplyee of my company) is not in a very good conditon,  i borrowed 1.2 million RMB (about 200,000 US dollars) from the bank for my new house and funiture. I even cannot afford to buy a car, since i have a big debt.

i am the only child of my family, i am too afraid if i cannot do well in everything , my parents will feel really disappointed. i kind of worry their health codition.

3I is the only hope for me.

I guess the majority of the investors for PTS or AGS might be Chinese, i am just a very ordinary one of them. i know i compain a lot like a bitch, and i think i will try not to do this anymore.

i wrote this post because i hope people could know more information about some Chinese investors, someone like me are kind of like gamblers.

Anyway, thank you all for reading these craps and  negative information.

hope everything will be on track soon, and hope i will not need to say this sentence again.

heroes? legends? lairs? illusionists?  the time will find out.


I think your disappointment is because you seems bet on only one investment, Bitshares. And you think you will never success if it fails. As an investor, I also hope Bitshares can succeed. But there is always no 100% guarantee of success in this world.

So far, I can see they have some progress. Though I also don't agree DPOS is so important to fix at this early stage. May be it is hard to change from POW to DPOS if the chain starts. Personally, I think POW (everyone has a chance to compete by whatever means) is fairer than POS or DPOS (richer gets rich, poorer get poor). That is why I don't object POW.

As a Chinese, I fully understand many people measure success mainly on wealth.
Western people seems are more open on different metrics of success.
When I was 29, I also got nothing, not even an apartment like you did.






54
KeyID / Re: [BOUNTY] Collect .bit websites here
« on: May 10, 2014, 06:44:54 pm »
http://jwlive.bit
http://joeco.bit
http://jbtv.bit
http://icetor.bit
http://imageconjurer.bit
http://ixirc.bit
http://itsacon.bit
http://icetor.bit
http://historiador.bit
http://hewgill.bit
http://hemp.bit
http://ge.bit
http://gilligan.bit
http://gregmorin.bit
http://gathman.bit
http://fl4.bit
http://fuskator.bit
http://freekeene.bit
http://flossystems.bit
http://evanmorrison.bit
http://edgebox.bit
http://experiencemachine.bit
http://everlasting.bit
http://evangallup.bit
http://dannythorpe.bit
http://defrex.bit
http://der-hueterorden.bit
http://dimining.bit
http://deafboy.bit
http://digmia.bit
http://dlss.bit
http://caktux.bit
http://cars.bit
http://churchofvirus.bit
http://clayfreeman.bit
http://clipperz.bit
http://coinconsultancy.bit
http://coinside.bit
http://carnicominstitute.bit
http://china.bit
http://crypto-folio.bit
http://cryptolottery.bit
http://cryptonit.bit
http://barce.bit
http://barnabywalters.bit
http://btcmp.bit
http://bortzmeyer.bit
http://brisasamables.bit
http://bricklink.bit
http://bunun.bit
http://alfaorigo.bit
http://averageone.bit
http://awesomelandscapes.bit
http://aychedee.bit
http://248gsu.bit

My PTS address: PqwjedmfSD4W2HyfxFDGyr4dkB1dqebxuT

55
KeyID / Re: [BOUNTY] Collect .bit websites here
« on: May 10, 2014, 06:25:43 pm »
zikula.bit
zerocool.bit
wikileaks.bit
waits.bit
virtualdisaster.bit
zerogov.bit
meowbit.bit
vipassana.bit/Root.203.0.html?&L=12
vocaholics.bit
veox.bit
unspy.bit
uni-tuebingen.bit
touchance.bit
thombs.bit
thepyre.bit
taioan.bit
twbooks.bit
theswarm.bit
thobi.bit
http://taigi.bit/taigu.asp
http://robok.bit
http://regchan.bit
redlegion.bit
http://rartoo.bit
http://quantumrab.bit
http://qwgg9654.bit
qwazerty.bit
http://qtosw.bit
qikcoin.bit
http://peercointalk.bit
http://pimphouse.bit
http://predictor.bit
http://partito-pirata.bit
http://proxmea.bit
okturtles.bit
http://nf.bit
http://nuke-bloodaxe.bit
http://nearme.bit
http://mikeward.bit
http://mobeets.bit
http://mehrkopf.bit
http://lanaken.bit
http://lidmug.bit
http://kurwa.bit
http://korea.bit
http://kcru.bit
http://kryptohippie.bit
http://kilobajt.bit


My PTS address: PqwjedmfSD4W2HyfxFDGyr4dkB1dqebxuT

56
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: April 25, 2014, 03:44:12 am »
Quote from: ffwong on April 25, 2014, 03:41:48 am
Quote from: sschechter on April 24, 2014, 10:43:21 pm
Anyone look at coinmarketcap today?  Not looking good for Mastercoin:

9    BitShares-PTS    $ 7,036,180    $ 4.31    1,631,463 PTS    $ 25,147    -0.79 %
10    Mastercoin    $ 6,651,626    $ 11.81    563,162 MSC*    $ 129,654    -70.69 %

Mastercoin is not just involved in this particular event (so called "stolen coin into maidsafe ipo"). They also involved in the "goxcoin" campaign (right after mtgox bursted) in which they asked mtgox victims to support their plan to convert victims' coins in mtgox to goxcoin running on Mastercoin platform. Of course, it turns out not successful, as people quickly identified their link to Mark Karpeles. As a mtgox victim myself, I don't want to get involved in any of Mastercoin projects.   >:(

Served with your popcorn, http://www.humint.is/goxcoin/


57
General Discussion / Re: MaidSafe IPO on Mastercoin
« on: April 25, 2014, 03:41:48 am »
Quote from: sschechter on April 24, 2014, 10:43:21 pm
Anyone look at coinmarketcap today?  Not looking good for Mastercoin:

9    BitShares-PTS    $ 7,036,180    $ 4.31    1,631,463 PTS    $ 25,147    -0.79 %
10    Mastercoin    $ 6,651,626    $ 11.81    563,162 MSC*    $ 129,654    -70.69 %

Mastercoin is not just involved in this particular event (so called "stolen coin into maidsafe ipo"). They also involved in the "goxcoin" campaign (right after mtgox bursted) in which they asked mtgox victims to support their plan to convert victims' coins in mtgox to goxcoin running on Mastercoin platform. Of course, it turns out not successful, as people quickly identified their link to Mark Karpeles. As a mtgox victim myself, I don't want to get involved in any of Mastercoin projects.   >:(

58
BitShares PTS / Re: 42 days estimated for Difficulty to retarget. Could this kill PTS?
« on: April 23, 2014, 06:02:14 pm »
Quote from: toast on April 23, 2014, 04:09:38 pm
Signing pools (delegates) earn a small fraction of the transaction fee from the block. Also, if you have enough stake, you will be proactive about protecting its value.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

I just worry the incentive is not sufficient to maintain sufficient number of nodes for the network.

"if you have enough stake, you will be proactive about protecting its value."
The problem of this statement is how many is "enough". Different people may have different interpretations. Not many of us have a significant stake. Many of us only have a tiny fraction (not enough to move the price if we dump all our shares to any exchange). Do we have the incentive to proactively protect its value and take part in the network?   I don't know.  (At least, I do not run my bitcoin client or miner programs now)

Unless the security of protocol does not depend on the number of nodes taking part in the network, I guess sufficient incentive is crucial to motivate people to take part. I am not a network expert, I don't know. May be I just don't understand.






59
BitShares PTS / Re: 42 days estimated for Difficulty to retarget. Could this kill PTS?
« on: April 23, 2014, 04:06:01 pm »
Quote from: toast on April 23, 2014, 02:39:50 pm
He's comparing to 2m, like what we gain if we switch to DPOS

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk


Hi,

So far, I only understand the network advantage of switching from POW to DPOS. (e.g. how environmental friendly, how stable it is....)

But from the miner's (or stake holder's) point of view, I still not quite sure the incentive to take part in this DPOS-based network?  What is the difference being a delegate or not? If I am not a delegate, is there sufficient incentive for me to take part? I think these are important questions to answer. Without understanding the incentives, people will not join.

Can anyone explain that?







60
General Discussion / Re: March Newsletter
« on: March 30, 2014, 09:21:06 am »
Quote from: Stan on March 29, 2014, 11:00:33 pm
Final version, for the historical record.
As mailed to 756 recipients days and days ago.

http://invictus-innovations.com/s/News-Letter-06-March-2014-tlyr.pdf

Hi Stan,

May be I overlooked. I cannot find the previous newsletters any more on the new site bitshares.org
The newsletter page seems only for subscription purpose (future newsletters, not past).

Do we still have an online archive of all newsletters? It should be useful for people like me who may overlook or miss some newsletters.

Thanks.



Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 23 queries.