We are going for mainstream (next year)... but in the short term we need to find more "true believers" who are in this for the vision and not just the service.

Than I suggest song with better message:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OGd4gplxQM

 

“We took the lucrative savings and checking account vault that
we designed for the hard-working, desperate, exploited, unbanked masses
struggling in corrupt banana republics where there is no rule of law...

…and strengthened it for use in the Civilized World!"

You are still selling...Start Educating!!

I am not actually tech concerned but feeling this feature of DPOS as extremely important. 
How far is this from actual implementation?

Any time frame?

I am sorry I miss up this tread. There is lot of noise around here these days. That’s what you are doing is very important and I have promised to support you as future dev delegate. Until then here is some of my thoughts on a topic.

You have probably hear story of Obvious Adams from Jay Abraham. If not please check here:
 http://lcweb2.loc.gov/service/gdc/scd0001/2006/20060721003ob/20060721003ob.pdf

I think Obvious Adams would probably go after LocalBitcoins community (LBC) but before any objections to that mater I would like to explain my meaning.

There are about 500 alt coins out there. Majority of them are POW. There are also bunch of unemployed tech related young people 18-35 who mines them, searching for easy buck. Guess what, in a time where they could only find low wage manually labored job, they are doing cool stuff filling joy of independence, capability and usefulness.
 
Before continue, I would like to point to one major things I have learn about marketing. In a marketing you are basically after peoples fillings not after theirs reasoning.

They also like socializing, spending time on forums and social networks talking about their mining rigs and cool new POW coins. In those groups few of them are specialized in whole selling, trading and on-off ramps for fiat. Those are also most active members of LBC. There is no need to talk about issues they are facing with various crypto exchanges except they have strong need for hedging against crypto fluctuations and also dealing with KYC procedures and fees from different on-off ramps such as Banks. The crypto community, as whole is facing growing regulators interest, so in the future things are only going to be worst. That’s why they are using Localbitcoins on the first place.

Now, there are probably more niche groups in LBC that should be explored. They all have strong need for Bitusd but probably have different approach model.

Those people I mentioned above, would be the most obvious early adapters of Bitusd. You only need few of them and they will do the rest of marketing for you. They will spread a word for you, so fast, in a way that most expensive marketing campaign would look like work of amateur.

I hope this could be useful anyway keep up with good work. 

All the sparks in this tread are Stud Hunt game I have been talking about.

This is obviously panic in charge here.

Keep head cool. Somebody is making profit on it and you should know that fact.

I may go slightly off topic but this could be insightful 

Exactly, and the first crypto currency community that can amplify the wisdom of the entire herd, and get the entire herd to change directions on a dime, without significant losses of the sheep, no matter how dumb, will blow any contract or “constitution” based bureaucracy away, with a leader making decisions before knowing how many of his heard will follow him.

This is in my humble opinion very interesting topic, making the essence of “proposed hard rules” only maybe stated a bit different: “that can amplify the wisdom and resources of the entire herd”

Exactly, we need to have a way to rigorously measure, concisely and quantitatively, how many people are willing to support any particular action. 

Voting Dac could do the trick.

 And we need to be able to dynamically change what we are proposing in an efficient and easy way, which will ensure everyone is still on board, until we get things at least near unanimous, so we don’t lose anyone.

This is the tricky part, at least for me. Could you please explain in plain language how exactly it could work? 

What are the real reasons for this “turn around”?

The dilution thing based on voting is another means for efficient voluntary donations. There are no clear obligations attached to it so SEC couldn’t go after you. You are buying time. We need those in order to survive, period.