Quote from: Geneko on February 14, 2017, 01:57:40 pm

low fees
could not be closed
could not be hacked

Yeah right, and after openledger API goes down as usual people who bought this slogans will be embarrassed.

Ok, what is most valuable advantage points that Bitshares Dex has to offer, related to specific market and current circumstances.

BTW: I use to play guitar. My friends and I loved saying:" First you learn to play and then buy the amplifier."

I don't recognize mandarin but could you put something similar this lines..

This exchange has low to no fees   

Bitshare DEX

 ....and cant be closed
.....................................
like this the message would be more powerful

Open Light Client
On the right  upper corner find Settings, between your account name and lock wallet option.
Go to Settings
On the left side bar you can find

General
Wallet
Accounts
Password
.......
.......

Clik on Wallet tab. Third button bellow you can find Lookup Balances button.
Thats it..

I understood it this way:

1. Multisig try to buy bitUSD 5% above feed. If it cant buy enough rest of bitUSD is going to borrow providing 2.5times collateral (Total budget for that operation is 90000BTS/day). BTS used for collateral never leaves multisig account.
2. Multisig send bitUSD to Xeroc.
3.  Xeroc use bitUSD as he likes (sell on whatever market he likes adding liquidity)
4. Every thing that is not paid out after the end of the worker will be settled and returned to the reserve fund
5. Everything left and held as collateral will be maintained by the committee and kept in full by the BitShares shareholders

You are NOT properly stating the alleged "imbalances". 

Sorry! English is not my native language.

The fact is, the required collateral is less than 200% (175% in bitshares.org/wallet, and a little more in the OL wallet).  And what do you do after borrowing (let's say butUSD, for example)?  You short it.  So you're selling it to someone for 100% face value.  So now your collateral goes from 175% to 75%.  Which means you actually have NET LEVERAGE when shorting BitAssets.  So there really is no imbalance with collateral. 

I mean practical use case. If you would open position with 175% collateral you would be margin called immediately, you need to add extra collateral to compensate for possible market swing. Please check out for actual shorter accounts collateral. I doubt you will find any account with less collateral to debt ratio of 230%.

What I am talking here are two things. Fear and Greed. Obviously fear prevail in bitUSD case.

Your reasoning is ok. But obviously it is different then peoples perception.
At the end my opinion is irrelevant here. What we need is testing. I may be right or wrong. But only real life tests could prove one or another.

One of better approaching is increasing usability like @Chris4210 kindly explained here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23755.0.html

My second thought on this is that fact that community smartcoins have low fee and anonymity is actually big advantage. We shouldn't mess with this much. We could improve usability also by providing solution for paying witnesses and workers, for instance in bitUSD. It would address main problem here, which is liquidity. It would also provide more benefit to the network.

It is discussed on several occasions in several different threads. I know it is of topic here but it is related to fees. How this could be done?
First we should add fee to smart coin transactions and all funds should go to community controlled account. From there it should pay for workers and witnesses. If there is not enough funds there, it should use available funds from reserve fund, and issue for instance bitUSD providing collateral.  It should immediately try to sell that short position. It should decrease price incrementally until all short is sell. It would provide incentive for buyers and eventually all short would be sold.
Another approach could be that instead of refund worker all available funds could be put on buy side with some % markup. It could combine the two approaches. It may also be another approaches I didn't think of.   
Eventually we could get liquid smart coin market so selling short wouldnt be a problem.

Similar discussion occurred here, maybe worth check out:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23707.0.html