Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - phoenix

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19
226
What if the invested period was varied. Not sure how hard this would be to program in, but say, every block's reward would have one of six maturity dates from one to six months. Kind of like a CD. That way there would be capital interest in the market right away, but long term investors, too.

You could have a 'random maturity date' based upon the hash of the block found such that the average maturity date is 6 months.  This would have almost no effect on pools who's average maturity date would be 6 months, but individuals solo-mining may get lucky and have a 1 day or week maturity.

This would keep the mining loto effect for solo-miners without enabling pools!

Since you're aiming for an average time of 6 months, there would be some blocks that take even longer, but if you really believe in the long term value of Bitshares it'll be worth it to wait even a few more months

227
Keyhotee / Size of Keyhotee Blockchain?
« on: November 20, 2013, 01:38:55 am »
I know that the plan is to make sure that the Keyhotee Blockchain is "lightweight and uses minimal bandwith" But does anyone have any estimates of how big it'll be?

228
This is a very interesting idea, but I'm not sure how it's any better than Keyhotee.

229
I wish there was a way for mining to not be a lottery but rather a process that everyone who participates is rewarded for per their contribution.  We do that now, but it's like a game of bingo when it should be more like renting your computer by the hour to the needs of the protocol.   Solo mining and distribution that makes people happy are flatly at odds with mass adoption, so while the incentives line up all over this beast here they very much do not - For each new person who I convince to mine makes it that much harder for me to find a block, and past a certain point, say a million solo miners, it seems like an impossibility for everyone to find a block so you limit your potential success.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't Keyhotee going to have a system where you get an increase in reputation points for both solving a block in the blockchain of Keyhotee ID's, and for getting close to solving a block? If this is correct, then it might be possible for Bitshares or some other crypto-currency to work like that, where people can earn coins both by solving a block, and by getting a difficulty close to the required difficulty.

Keyhotee ID has you merge-mine name registration transactions along with the block.   This is good for a network with no other incentive for mining, but would slow down payments if you had to spend 8 hours to merge-mine every transaction.  A down side to this is that it increases the size of every transaction and thus the block chain.

But I suspect there may be something along these lines that could be employed.

So what exactly is on the Keyhotee Block chain besides the name registrations?

230
I wish there was a way for mining to not be a lottery but rather a process that everyone who participates is rewarded for per their contribution.  We do that now, but it's like a game of bingo when it should be more like renting your computer by the hour to the needs of the protocol.   Solo mining and distribution that makes people happy are flatly at odds with mass adoption, so while the incentives line up all over this beast here they very much do not - For each new person who I convince to mine makes it that much harder for me to find a block, and past a certain point, say a million solo miners, it seems like an impossibility for everyone to find a block so you limit your potential success.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't Keyhotee going to have a system where you get an increase in reputation points for both solving a block in the blockchain of Keyhotee ID's, and for getting close to solving a block? If this is correct, then it might be possible for Bitshares or some other crypto-currency to work like that, where people can earn coins both by solving a block, and by getting a difficulty close to the required difficulty.

231
General Discussion / Re: Transition from PTS to Bitshares
« on: November 20, 2013, 01:09:41 am »
But you will only own the PTS mined so far, right?

So it's taking a snapshot at release - or will future pts get credited too?

Just a snapshot of PTS ownership distribution at first release, when the genesis block of a new DAC is laid down.  After that, your PTS are still good for ownership in other developing DACs that honor the ProtoShares Social Contract.
Before obtaining a snapshot should be given me some time so that we can withdraw the coins from the trading platform into our wallets, in other words, there should be a prior notice.

Yes, that is a very good point.  We will give everyone a 2 week notice and the exact block number from which the snapshot will be taken.

This should also be done before you fork protoshares into proto-domainshares so we can withdraw from trading platforms

232
General Discussion / Re: so what is the business model ?
« on: November 20, 2013, 12:28:17 am »
phoenix - thank you! 

That explanation truly progressed my understanding.

You're welcome. I would recommend looking into the way it all works more deeply before you invest heavily in any of it. I personally think that it'll be an incredible opportunity, but the best piece of investment advice is: don't take anyone's advice, do your own research and decide for yourself 

233
General Discussion / Re: so what is the business model ?
« on: November 20, 2013, 12:24:41 am »
Thank you for an excellent, short, and sweet explanation.
Where can we send you a ProtoShare as a token of appreciation?


You're welcome. If you want to tip me you can send PTS to PjDesV4pDnExpfn7WnCHk95mWWfCa2ELq4.

7cc7df3f2f4d48fa64e193b6983622700606e64c5a29b13c554cbc6f4282d183

Recieved, thank you very much! :)

234
I really like the vesting idea. However, my major concern is that with something like BitShares, you want a bigger market at first for a prediction market to work well. If you think the people who hold ProtoShares will be enough to give BitShares the momentum it needs to maintain good markets in basic BitAssets like BitUSD, BitBTC, etc. then I am all for it. If we don't have enough volume for these markets to be efficient, then it will be very hard to convince the others after 6 months that the idea will work with a bigger pool. Just my 2 cents.

There is always ample supply of currency on the markets and transaction fees are available to all miners with the normal 120 block maturity.   I don't see anything that would limit the user base.
Not limit the user base, but limit the initial supply of BitAssets. Consider say 1 million BitShares in existence at launch (several people won't convert their ProtoShares to BitShares and use it immediately, right?) It would be hard to predict what % of initial BitShares will be converted to BitAssets, but I am guessing 10% (may be I am off?) so you have 100,000 BitShares out. At today's market rate, that's the equivalent of 1000 BitBTC but then not everyone is going to play the BitBTC market, there are several others. So say 500 BitBTC in the system at launch. Do you think this is enough supply for the prediction market to work well and not skew towards heavy longs/shorts for extended periods? I don't know the answer, just saying it's something you should consider.

There is no 'conversion' between ProtoShares and BitShares... everyone will immediately have BOTH ProtoShares and BitShares.  Your BitShares are kind of a 'dividend payment' on your ProtoShares :).    Therefore, there is no cost or conversion to create BitShares from ProtoShares and in fact your ProtoShares will remain valuable for future DACs.

But if the number of Bitshares available for trading stays the same for 6 months, then suddenly starts increasing as the blocks mature, won't there be a massive opportunity for people to short the market? Because the demand probably won't increase very much from halfway through month five to halfway through month six, but the supply will, making the value of any individual bitshare drop.

235
General Discussion / Re: Spiritual / Religious DACs
« on: November 20, 2013, 12:12:12 am »
hmmm... As a somewhat religious/spiritual person I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, having a reliable source of religious texts in a digital format would be very useful, but trying to operate an entire Religion through a DAC could be difficult. Simply suggesting philosophies or ways of life could be done, although these generally aren't considered full religions by themselves

236
Just to clear things up, bitshares that are built into the genesis block from protoshares will still be spendable, right? As for everything else, I think the 6 months plan is a great idea, especially for people like me that're just mining in the background on their home computer, and on their laptop when they don't need it for something else. If it becomes big, then I've earned a lot, if it flops, I've lost almost nothing. This is a good plan, I hope everything works out

237
General Discussion / Re: so what is the business model ?
« on: November 19, 2013, 11:46:23 pm »
Thank you for an excellent, short, and sweet explanation.
Where can we send you a ProtoShare as a token of appreciation?


You're welcome. If you want to tip me you can send PTS to PjDesV4pDnExpfn7WnCHk95mWWfCa2ELq4.

238
General Discussion / Re: Bit-U PTS / BTC Exchange
« on: November 19, 2013, 10:25:59 pm »
OK, I wish you had given the users a little more of a heads-up, but i'm fine with the switch

239
General Discussion / Re: so what is the business model ?
« on: November 19, 2013, 10:11:48 pm »
Here's my attempt at some simplified explanations. It's not as short as I would like it to be, but I think it does a fairly good job of getting the idea across, especially to people with minimal technical knowledge. Let me know if anything is inaccurate or you think there's a better way of explaining things:

DACs:
DAC stands for Distributed Autonomous Corporation. The basic idea is that some service offered by normal corporations, run by humans, can be performed using software on computers. People who want to work for a particular DAC can download this software, and then run it on their computer. The more computing power that people give to the DAC, the more reliably the DAC can perform the service it offers for its customers. If somebody wants to buy the services of a particular DAC, they can pay the DAC directly for the service using some digital currency, such as Bitcoin or shares in the DAC, and then they receive the service from the DAC, and their payment is distributed to the people who ran the software for the DAC, corresponding to the computing power they gave to the DAC.

Protoshares:
Every DAC that Invictus Innovations plans on creating will have shares. The purpose of these shares is two-fold: they determine who gets to receive the payments given to a particular DAC (just like a major corporation would divide its profits among its shareholders), and they also function as a form of payment to the DAC. In other words, the DACs that Invictus Innovations will release will take shares in themselves as payment, and then re-distribute those shares among the remaining shareholders. Protoshares are a digital currency that turns into shares in all DACs created by Invictus Innovations. They are “mined” by running special mining software on your computer, and each time a DAC is released by Invictus Innovations, you will get one share in that DAC for every Protoshare you own. One advantage to using Protoshares to create the shares for the DACs before their release is that Invictus Innovations is able to determine valuable people expect shares in a particular DAC to be, since people know that every Protoshare they buy will effectively buy them a share in future DACs. In order to tell how much an individual DAC is valued by the market, Invictus Innovations will simply fork the current Protoshares, and say that the particular fork corresponds to a particular DAC. (Forking is essentially cloning something so that you can manipulate /change the clone, without affecting the original.)

Now, let’s take an upcoming DAC, and explain what problem it fixes, and how it solves that problem:

DAC name:
Bitshares
Problems it addresses:

Let’s say I want to trade digital currencies. In order to do it I need to log onto an online exchange, and then give them my email & password. Then, I send them my bitcoins, and start to trade. There are many things that could go wrong here: 1) they might sell my personal information, 2) they might take my coins and vanish, 3) If hackers compromise the exchange I could lose my bitcoins, 4) if I want to trade multiple currencies that aren’t all offered on one exchange, it’s very hard to manage all the different accounts and transferring the funds between them.

How Bitshares fixes this problem:
1)   I don’t give my personal info to anyone. I simply download the client, and then I can start trading, the only account I need is the Bitshares address that my computer can generate automatically
2)   As long as there are still people mining on the Bitshares blockchain, the DAC will continue to live. Also, Bitshares never actually takes your funds, it simply allows two people to trade with each other, knowing that the DAC will ensure that both sides send their funds to each other at the same time, thus your funds never actually leave your control, they’re simply traded for different funds (i.e., Bitshares for BitUSD
3)   There is no centralized server for hackers to attack. In order for them to actually steal your funds they would have to derive your private key (Which basically means doing a bunch of math that would take centuries to on a supercomputer, so you’re safe) and submit a false transaction using that key. Then they could steal your funds (remember, this is only a problem if they have access to a supercomputer more powerful than every supercomputer currently know). They could also try to block any transactions you submit by performing a 51% attack, where they gain 51% of the computing power in the DAC, and then do the work of verifying only some transactions so quickly that everyone else that’s trying to do work is unable to keep up with them, so only the people performing the 51% attack decide which transactions the DAC performs. Remember, in order to do this they need more computing power than everyone else combined, which is a LOT.
4)   No one Bitshares blockchain will cover every asset that you may want to trade. However, all Bitshares blockchains will trade the original Bitshares, which will make the exchange of funds between them much simpler.

I think this does an OK job of explaining things, I'd be happy to answer any questions you still have.

240
General Discussion / Re: 3D Printing DAC
« on: November 19, 2013, 02:33:27 am »
How do you propose that such a DAC would filter a truly useful design from something that has no use, such as a distorted sphere? If someone can find a way to do that, then this could become a very useful DAC, as well as a profitable one.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19