Quote from: sudo on May 23, 2014, 03:52:45 pm

一碗水端平，如果不支持AGS2.0流动  为啥就支持PTS那个+15%的方案呢？

Please elaborate on this point.  What did you mean by "equal justice"?

(I'm not sure my Google translation is correct - perhaps a few more words would help?) 

Quote from: 天籁 on May 23, 2014, 02:19:52 am

钱包显示的是BIP数量

Quote from: Snail on May 23, 2014, 02:09:07 am

我有些疑虑，所有DAC的股份总量都是BIP，那么上交易所将如何表示？XTS BIP , PTS2 BIP ,DNS BIP,LTO BIP ？

我说的是在交易网站如何显示，与DAC系统无关。比如比特币会显示BTC，莱特币显示LTC，狗币DOGE，原始股PTS，那么BIP应该怎么显示？XTS BIP , PTS2 BIP ,DNS BIP,LTO BIP ？

DPOS frees up 300,000 that would have been needed to pay miners.

What do to with them is the question.

Not mining them (i.e. burning them) would give a 15% one time windfall to PTS holders even though it was AGS donations that made the DPOS breakthrough possible.

We think those savings from that R&D should be used to benefit everyone in our industry.

Quote from: CrazyBit on May 17, 2014, 07:50:16 am

这翻译是不是用google翻的，读起来怎么怪怪的。

我敢肯定这不是谷歌翻译，因为我用了一遍。读起来怪怪的大概是应该是因为我们与猫兄相隔两岸，语言习惯略有区别。

或许你需要我修改后的版本http://www.mybitshares.com/bitshares-x-status-update.html

抛开技术因素，价值需求因素不谈，我一直不明白为什么用BTA直接参与玩法就便利了，利于推广了，从Lotto的角度看，用BTA还不如直接用BTC。