之前关于竞争币，dan之前有过描述，具体的帖子记不得了，大概意思是3i的DAC在创新方面是目前山寨币，无法比拟的，包括2代币的创新性，相比来说3i的DAC理念也是遥遥领先的。关于这一点，我也非常认同，我想如果3i能够按照白皮书所说，发布相应的DAC应用，我不知道目前有哪个竞争币能够对3i造成威胁。

关于用户导向，数字货币只有两种人，一种是投资者，一种是投机者，我认为这两者之间没有明显的界限，非要区分的话，在我看来了解数字货币原理和技术实现以及未来前景上比较清晰的，在投资者中比例更多一些， 而相反的人在投机者中的比例更大一些。那么我想3i从去年11月到现在，应该已经吸引里大部分人的目光，看好3i并理解3iDAC理念的大部分人的恐怕已经持有了pts或投资了ags。

如果选择给其他竞争币持有者一定比例的DAC，这些人投机性会更大一些，而投机性在DAC的前期发展上，没有多少好处，更多的是带来DAC价格的大起大落。

还有一点，这种免费赠送给竞争币持有者的营销方式，在一定程度上反而推广了竞争币，不但使更多的人了解其他山寨币，而且会促使更多的人购买相应竞争币来等待3i的赠送，这是不是有点搞笑？

+5

it is fine to let the developer make the final decision for the third party DACs, but for the DAC which will be developed by 3I, most of the resource come from the AGSer. isn't it reasonable to allocate more shares for AGSer?

Quote from: Stan on April 11, 2014, 03:00:46 am

Quote from: CrazyBit on April 11, 2014, 01:18:57 am

Should we allocate more shares for the AGSer in the coming DACs, let us say not 50/50 for PTS/AGS, but 60/40, 70/30...., coz i think the AGSer shows more support and confidence for the project ,without the AGSer, the crowdfunding would not such successful as we are seeing now, the AGSer contributes more for 3I, even for the DAC industry. there is a Chinese proverb:get more pay for more work done.

This decision must be made by the developers of each new DAC based upon their marketing and business plans.

As long as they treat both PTS and AGS equally with the first 10% each, they have honored the Social Consensus.

Now, they need to tune the remaining 80% to make their DAC successful.  If they need to attract donations, then emphasize a pool of proven patron donors - like AGS.  If they want to attract people who buy and hold liquid shares in the whole industry, or a specialized industry sector, then emphasize a deal tuned for PTS or one of its proto-children.

Whatever they choose, they must remember to ask what opportunity they are leaving open for their competitors to fork some other, "better" mix.

In the end, smart developers will do whatever gives them the best competitive edge for their new DAC. 

Market forces rule.

 

【The approach I would recommend is to destroy funds spent on tickets/bets, with maybe a 1% fee to ticket processors (miners) . . awarding all prizes from coinbase. Unlimited prize size. Profits are generated through deflation as money supply is gradually reduced.】这个不错。

【There are no need to issue jetton, lotto shares are themselves being as jetton, users use lotto shares to bet/buy lotto tickets, to win jackpots, then no need to back.
People own lotto shares to play the game, or act as DAC owners, or for purpose of mining, they can select whatever role they like.】参考这个，其中股份即为股份，又是筹码、奖金。其中不会涉及BTC、法币等。

Sorry to say that the content is seriously inconsistent with the subject.

Quote from: alt on March 31, 2014, 12:18:50 am

好久没跟，英文贴太多，看不懂了，有几个问题
1. 通过投票选出受托人的算法是怎样的？选出一个受托人需要多长时间呢？
2. 如果发现一个受托人不诚实，罢免他的算法是怎样的？需要多长时间？
3. 另外有想过如何保证一个受托人的服务时间吗？太频繁更换就影响交易效率了。另外受托人的服务能得到奖励吗？

你提的问题很关键，假如票选受托人和罢免受托人的时间不合理，就会存在如下攻击模型：
假如获得最多票数的两个备选受托人的票数相当，攻击者持有大量BTS，他投向任何一方都会影响受托人的选举结果，那么他就可以通过频繁更换投票对象来使受托人频换更换，最后造成网络和交易不稳定。

攻击者既然持有大量BTS，那他为什么要攻击呢，拿钱打水漂玩？

lotto：【To own future DACs in this franchise.  This is the Daddy-DAC of a proto-family!】

是分给PTS/AGS呢，还是lotto呢？应该是lotto更合理、有利。

还是打算用云彩

华彩带有一定的政治种族味道

云彩，云之彩，彩之云

华彩原意见百科【上文已说】，并无政治种族味道，现在用的最多的相关词语是华彩乐章。翻译成外文时可以按原意翻译。

云彩让人想到的首先是天上漂浮的云，其次是IT界的云【中心化的】，谐音【晕菜】，极不可取。

建议定名为【华彩】

百科：华彩---音乐术语，原指意大利正歌剧中咏叹调末尾处由独唱者即兴发挥的段落。后来在协奏曲乐章的末尾处也常用此种段落，乐队通常暂停演奏，由独奏者充分发挥其表演技巧和乐器性能。这部分的演奏较自由，难度也较高，因而也较引人注目。华彩乐段最初由独奏者即兴创作，后来作曲者也开始写作。如莫扎特、贝多芬为自己的协奏曲写了一些华彩乐段，自门德尔松后，很多作曲家都自写华彩乐段，成为作品中的有机部分和有独立特点的段落。

华彩---两层含义：1. 主要做华人喜闻乐见的博彩。2. 去中心化博彩相对传统博彩具颠覆性，是博彩的终极方式和高潮。

所用筹码就叫【彩码】，简单、上口。终极目标就是要一统博彩江湖。