Timestamp

Controlling time in terms of?

1. The current internet belongs to three-dimensional network (two-way, reversible) ,which is the steady or quasi-steady simplification of the four-dimensional space-time problems of the real world. The application on this network can only be built on occasions with non-chronological requirements.
2. On the bases of the three-dimensional network, blockchain technology-based networks increase the time coordinate or block chain (one-way, irreversible), thus completely realize the full four-dimensional space-time description of the real-world, the application will bound to be revolutionary.

BitShares Forum » Local » 中文(Chinese) (Moderators: lib, ripplexiaoshan) » 基于块链技术网络的哲学思考
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4585.0

 

Try looking at it this way:

The price of PTS at any point in time represents the market's assessment of the potential of the entire BitShares industry.

When a DAC spins off, some of that potential spins off with it and the price of PTS drops by the amount of future potential that is no longer predicted by PTS.  Nobody minds though, because they now own shares in both and the sum of the two is greater because the value that moved has gone from potential to actual.

So when donated PTS shares "split" the donated value just moves into different buckets.  It is still there to help fund the growth of the industry as the donors intended.  To the extent that these spin-offs are successful, the seed money available to maintain and promote them grows too.

And thus each successful spinoff replenishes the supply of funds expended to create it, making those funds available again for the next DAC in the development queue.  With luck, the funds will grow exponentially, making the number of DACs we can fund in parallel grow exponentially.

This is what we have promised to do with spinoffs from donated funds.  We did not promise to leave them idle or to burn them.  That would be poor stewardship indeed!

牛逼！

如果bts被恶意收购，可以筹码卖出后 ，fork一个。用旧的快照重新开……
让恶意资本自己玩蛋儿去

    I will definitely support the Lab with all my XTS. Go,Go,Go!

之前关于竞争币，dan之前有过描述，具体的帖子记不得了，大概意思是3i的DAC在创新方面是目前山寨币，无法比拟的，包括2代币的创新性，相比来说3i的DAC理念也是遥遥领先的。关于这一点，我也非常认同，我想如果3i能够按照白皮书所说，发布相应的DAC应用，我不知道目前有哪个竞争币能够对3i造成威胁。

关于用户导向，数字货币只有两种人，一种是投资者，一种是投机者，我认为这两者之间没有明显的界限，非要区分的话，在我看来了解数字货币原理和技术实现以及未来前景上比较清晰的，在投资者中比例更多一些， 而相反的人在投机者中的比例更大一些。那么我想3i从去年11月到现在，应该已经吸引里大部分人的目光，看好3i并理解3iDAC理念的大部分人的恐怕已经持有了pts或投资了ags。

如果选择给其他竞争币持有者一定比例的DAC，这些人投机性会更大一些，而投机性在DAC的前期发展上，没有多少好处，更多的是带来DAC价格的大起大落。

还有一点，这种免费赠送给竞争币持有者的营销方式，在一定程度上反而推广了竞争币，不但使更多的人了解其他山寨币，而且会促使更多的人购买相应竞争币来等待3i的赠送，这是不是有点搞笑？

+5

it is fine to let the developer make the final decision for the third party DACs, but for the DAC which will be developed by 3I, most of the resource come from the AGSer. isn't it reasonable to allocate more shares for AGSer?

Quote from: Stan on April 11, 2014, 03:00:46 am

Quote from: CrazyBit on April 11, 2014, 01:18:57 am

Should we allocate more shares for the AGSer in the coming DACs, let us say not 50/50 for PTS/AGS, but 60/40, 70/30...., coz i think the AGSer shows more support and confidence for the project ,without the AGSer, the crowdfunding would not such successful as we are seeing now, the AGSer contributes more for 3I, even for the DAC industry. there is a Chinese proverb:get more pay for more work done.

This decision must be made by the developers of each new DAC based upon their marketing and business plans.

As long as they treat both PTS and AGS equally with the first 10% each, they have honored the Social Consensus.

Now, they need to tune the remaining 80% to make their DAC successful.  If they need to attract donations, then emphasize a pool of proven patron donors - like AGS.  If they want to attract people who buy and hold liquid shares in the whole industry, or a specialized industry sector, then emphasize a deal tuned for PTS or one of its proto-children.

Whatever they choose, they must remember to ask what opportunity they are leaving open for their competitors to fork some other, "better" mix.

In the end, smart developers will do whatever gives them the best competitive edge for their new DAC. 

Market forces rule.

 

【The approach I would recommend is to destroy funds spent on tickets/bets, with maybe a 1% fee to ticket processors (miners) . . awarding all prizes from coinbase. Unlimited prize size. Profits are generated through deflation as money supply is gradually reduced.】这个不错。

【There are no need to issue jetton, lotto shares are themselves being as jetton, users use lotto shares to bet/buy lotto tickets, to win jackpots, then no need to back.
People own lotto shares to play the game, or act as DAC owners, or for purpose of mining, they can select whatever role they like.】参考这个，其中股份即为股份，又是筹码、奖金。其中不会涉及BTC、法币等。