Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zhouxiaobao

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 53
76
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote积分公告
« on: September 06, 2019, 01:13:30 am »
有这么多的收入来源了不妨发行IOUCNY,
用未来的收入预期担保IOUCNY的价值,制定好回购规则。

现在收入来源还没有一个实现,希望你能支持公会见证人ioex,至少先让公会有一个收入点,壮大公会符合绝大部分投资者利益。

77
中文 (Chinese) / Re: MCR=1.6和MCR=1.5的区别
« on: September 05, 2019, 12:59:09 am »
如果真的难理解,姑且还可以把mcr理解为锁仓比例。本来按照1.6比例锁仓的,结果降为1.5,锁仓比例降低了,价格能不跌么。

78
中文 (Chinese) / Re: MCR=1.6和MCR=1.5的区别
« on: September 05, 2019, 12:31:22 am »
       bts的机制就是主要靠爆仓实现锚定,bitcny贬值了,每次都是强清还没用上,爆仓就已经回收多余的bitcny了。
       只要bitcny贬值,爆仓是一定要爆的。mcr降低,本来1. 6就爆仓的,只会让市场进一步压低价格,压到1.5再爆。

79
中文 (Chinese) / Re: MCR=1.6和MCR=1.5的区别
« on: September 04, 2019, 04:29:48 pm »
首先,当然不够用。

爆仓抵押线分离解决不了什么问题,不过是把本来高位爆的搞到低位爆,割得更爽。

BTS价格不是由bitCNY需求量决定的,爆仓也不意味着bitCNY多余。

降低MCR对BTS价格不会有明显影响,但会增多bitCNY供应,也会增加系统交易费收入,提高回购的量。


bitcny供大于求……bitcny贬值……内盘价高于外盘价……爆仓单一出来就立即压盘(被吃,既bitcny被回收)……内盘价回落至外盘价附近……bitcny贬值消除。

bitcny供小于求……bitcny溢价……内盘价低于外盘价……爆仓单在成交价之上不压盘……由于不害怕爆仓,会鼓励投资者抵押(参考前段时间usd区)……内盘价上升至外盘价附近……bitcny溢价消除。

所以,消除溢价应当降mssr,不是降mcr。爆仓单挂在上面不是坏事,不用降mcr也会被吃掉,时间问题。只要不影响锚定,有爆仓单在上面又如何?内盘拉盘没用,内盘一拉,bitcny就贬值。只有bitcny供小于求的时候bts才会涨。

80
中文 (Chinese) / Re: MCR=1.6和MCR=1.5的区别
« on: September 04, 2019, 03:33:21 pm »
      现在不是cny不够用,为何还要加杠杆呢?
      如果要减轻爆仓的影响,为何不把爆仓线与抵押线分开呢?
      比如,抵押线在1.6,到了1.6就不允许抵押了。但是爆仓线设在1.5,到了1.5以下再爆仓。让做空有点障碍啊,至少砸10个点才有爆仓单吃,现在一砸盘就有爆仓,越砸越多,做空太容易了。

      bts的机制决定了价格是由bitcny的需求量决定的。当bitcny供大于求,bitcny会贬值,则系统就会用爆仓回收多余的bitcny,反之当bitcny溢价的时候,爆仓单比成交价还高,系统就停止回收bitcny了。现在bitcny需求不振,还加杠杆增加bitcny的供给,结果只能是系统通过爆仓回收多余的抵押出来的bitcny,造成价格进一步降低。

81
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股的未来,交易所还是稳定币?
« on: September 02, 2019, 04:33:22 pm »
内盘刷量成本太高,确实影响交易所制造流动性,abit提出过一个方法,就是按持币数量减少账户的手续费。这样方便内盘的交易所刷量,制造深度,没有做市商肯定是不行的。比如说从持有三百万以上的bts的账号开始梯次减手续费,一直到两千万以上的可以将手续费降为零。甚至说可以三千万以上的连gas费都省了。不知GDEX怎么看。

82
General Discussion / Re: AVG2907 dumping price massivly ?
« on: August 31, 2019, 02:39:33 pm »
I hope all witnesses will adopt the principle of maximum price.

That is mean, between the different exchange prices, the higher price is used as the feeding price.

This prevents whales from shorting at a very low cost on a single exchange.

83
不要慌, 老外还在懵逼中.

价格很稳定,老外很满意

今日早上4点钟某人在P网砸了200万个BTS,就把价格砸了近10%下来,现在都在懵逼中

一发而制全身, 这个喂价机制似乎并非那么可靠 :-\  尤其是现在整个外盘深度都浅的要死的情况下...

现在也没有人关心喂价, 也就马马虎虎这样了


最高价原则,最高价原则,最高价原则!

哪些见证人配合砸盘降喂价,不知你能否查出来,我们可以推动给他撤票。

84
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote积分公告
« on: August 31, 2019, 02:08:44 pm »
Just to inform i removed my vote for witness ioex because he offered profit sharing which many members and myself included told him this will make us not vote for him.

Seeing his permanet afford trying to join witness ,participating in discussion,upgrading his hardware and removing his profit share concept made me reward his positiv development.


With regret i will take my vote back from ioex


Quote
3.公会今后支持的节点,在节点质量合格的前提下,公会将谋求捐赠(分红)。目前公会节点ioex,入选后将给公会捐赠30%收入。今后节点数量还将增加。

      ioex是公会的节点,给公会捐赠部分收入支持公会发展,合情合理,并不是买票。

      公会的壮大也符合绝大部分持币人的利益。如果你是代表猴哥投的票,如果你也是持币人,公会的壮大当然也符合你和猴哥的利益。

       我也注意到你的投票策略和公会基本相同。希望你给ioex投票。

85
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote积分公告
« on: August 31, 2019, 01:33:12 pm »
6.公会谋求申请worker,worker 工资将用cnvote发放,worker收入全部用来回购cnvote。

老外理解为公会专门申请一个提案,提案的BTS全部用来回购CNVOTE,对他们来说就是以权谋私,变相增发。如果老外误解的话,希望有工会代表出来澄清。

6.公会谋求申请worker,worker                  工资将cnvote         发放,worker收入全部用来回购cnvote。

我的理解是这样...

就是如binggo所言,就是公会如果申请worker,这个worker可以是研发、宣传等等的,但是公会不想用bts砸盘来发工资,而是改为用cnvote发放。

86
不要慌, 老外还在懵逼中.

价格很稳定,老外很满意

87
General Discussion / Re: Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: August 27, 2019, 03:39:58 pm »
      I think our differences lie mainly in our different positions.

      I hold bts, so I want to raise the price, and you are workers, do not own bts, so you do not care about the price.You want to get paid by  worker.

      Similarly, the BTS in the BEOS account is not his own, and he doesn't care about the price too. He just wants to take money from workers.

     I hope all BEOS supporters will realize this.

88
General Discussion / Re: Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: August 27, 2019, 12:43:59 pm »
Please explain to me, the daily trading volume is 2M Yuan, and you complain about 16M being allocated over the next 6-12 months? Is that what you are saying?
Also, if you can find developers that can do high quality work for less than 100$/hr, please come forward with them. Surely none of our core developers would (and should) work for less (IMHO).
Quality has its price.

Also, BEOS has its own subforum, I suspect you can reach them there better.

     You really don't know anything about finance. I spent all an afternoon the day before yesterday and sold BTS for 30, 000 yuan, and the price was smashed down  0.005 yuan. You said selling 16 million yuan had no effect on the price?
     The total recharge of the DEX this month is about 14 million, with more than 13 million withdrawals. In a month, the inflow of capital is no more than 1 million yuan (fortunately, it is still an inflow), you said you withdraw 16 million, the price will not collapse?
      Of course, you can get a high salary if the job is really effective. But I would like to ask, last year BTS spent about 20 million yuan, this year has spent 8 million yuan, so much money, what are the effects ah?The effect is that prices have fallen more than any other smart coins?

89
当初中本聪创造BTC的初衷,就是为了对抗法币的无限制的增发。

难道BTS最终只是换了个形式来增发吗?

当前最大的问题是,象BEOS这样的大票仓,根本不关心BTS价格有没有支撑,根本不关心当前生态是不是足够健康,他们关心的,只是如何通过投票获得利益。

如果听任这样下去,市场只会越来越对BTS失去信心,BTSer们恐怕死无葬身之地。

我的建议是,通过投票停止一切可以停止的worker,等到市场恢复元气,再酌情恢复。

市场恢复元气,可以以USD市场黄单消失为标志。


蟹老板威武!散户表示非常振奋!
提一点小意见,我认为至少内盘日交易量持续稳定在一千万人民币以上才能认定市场回暖,毕竟这是以往最普通的交易量了。如果达到了,继续开发。如果永远都达不到这个交易量,说明市场抛弃bts了,再开发也没意义了。

90
General Discussion / Huge spending will lead to the collapse of BTS
« on: August 27, 2019, 09:11:14 am »
      According to rough statistics, the total amount of funds applied for by all of the workers this year is about 26 million yuan, and about 8 million yuan has been allocated.
     None of the projects have been fully allocated except for one worker named “steemfest”.
     Now the funding gap is more than 16 million yuan, and now the daily BTS trading volume is even less than 2 million yuan.It is clear that in such a flagging market, the withdrawal of such a large amount of money will inevitably lead to the collapse of BTS prices.
     In the end, these workers will not get enough money also, even if the vote went through.
     What's more, these workers are extremely corrupt, wasteful and inefficient. These worker's programmers, for example, earn more than $100 an hour.
      BEOS, who had about 350 million votes, voted for most of the workers ,I wish BEOS to reconsider his voting strategy.
      I appeal to all of you vote on "redund400k", to reduce this huge expenditure and rescue BTS.


     Here you can find out part of the amazing spending on these workers:
     https://workers.bitshares.foundation/

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 53