Delegates should be focused on getting the vote out, their pay should go up the more votes they get. 

Theory:  people not approving of a delegate shouldn't be expected to pay for that delegate so pay should be proportional.

This would significantly increase incentive for delegates to get people involved....

Created the Bitshares Market directory to help display current DAC information and highlight the known DACs in development.

Anyone who has done something as impressive as the ones on this list?

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5259.0

Quote from: gulu on August 05, 2014, 05:39:26 pm

How about making the protocol such that a checkpoint is automatically added whenever there are 51 accumulative changes of delegates ?  No centralization, and now 100% safe.

51 delegate signatures *is* a checkpoint. Adding a "checkpoint" at the protocol level would just be cosmetic, it has the same effect.

Having a process for changing the client to have client-side checkpoints is what you need to have "real" checkpoints.

居然没有我

Quote from: sfinder on July 25, 2014, 01:08:09 pm

可以算我一个，我是社区的一份子。和社区一起成长。为bts的普及做了很多工作。
1）多伦多华人学生课外项目义务辅导员。我指导这些孩子成立bts兴趣小组以及辅导他们设立btsx代表。
2）应bm要求设立网络演示钱包 http://54.191.7.103:8080/
3）和熊熊，J神等协助社区的稳定发展，以及解答一些技术和应用问题