个人认为这是一种非常危险的观点。原因如下。
一、喂价出现目前的状况，是因为缺乏准确的调节依据，gdex网关已经开始公布外盘BTS的实时行情，但最好的方式是在内盘建立起集成式的bitCNY承兑机制并以接口的形式提供给其它交易所，这样就能尽量的集中的统计每天bitCNY实时的承兑量及费率 。在目前缺乏以上基础时动态调节MCR将使BTS系统更加不稳定，。
二、MCR的动态调节既使技术上具备了可行性，但也要建立类似美联储式的预期式调节，而不能像目前喂价式的调节。在预期调节方式下，必须要建立相应的决策机制与机构，见证人只能是执行机构。

bitCNY目前还处于坚苦的阵地守卫战中，但我相信，我们能打羸这场战争。同时，危机也是转机，伟大的创举大都是在危机中旦生的！我建议一旦bitCNY在这次危机中走出来并且兑现1：1锚定。我们应该围绕着“币市危机下的bitCNY依然兑现着1：1锚定的承诺”主题，通过专门的提案资金按如下组织方式进行宣传。

一、选出若干公认的在币圈内有真正影响力的媒体平台，由其提供策划并报价;
二、将报价以提案形式确认并划拔资金，并建立多签账号，公开透明的支付运作;
三、建立BTS研究基金，按年或季度评选发布的关于BTS使用，方向，内容等各方面的有影响力的文章或论文，给予奖励。

I find this talk of transparency somewhat disingenuous, as very few witnesses produce a report of their operations periodically.

I will soften that to the extent I don't monitor non-English publications, so if there are non-English witness reports out there, great. Would be nice to see them announced on a prominent platform or in the Bitshares_Witnesses channel of Telegram. I asked one Chinese speaker to translate for me once, but he never followed thru. Neither did I in finding another.

I think Google translate has probably gotten good enough where it is adequate to bridge the language barrier between Mandarin & English now.

I have very consistently published a monthly witness report, I have been more transparent than most witnesses in what I do each month. I have repeatedly stated I use bts_tools for my price feeds. That will change when the MCR fix is released, at which time I will use zapata's price feed script.

I have been publishing my reports on steemit, but given the recent changes on that platform I will be moving to the whaleshares platform. I have no idea which sites Chinese shareholders have access to, given their governments censorship of the internet. I will make it a point to update my witness proposal thread here on this forum, to at least provide a link to my full report on Whaleshares.

I encourage all witnesses to follow the lead of zapata and myself to improve your level of transparency of ALL of your witness operations, at least those that don't compromise security, not just transparency in how you produce feeds.

Maximum respect to you @zapata. As a relatively new witness you set a good example for others to follow.

Good suggestion！But it's best to use the proposal form to determine it.

很高兴看到理事会成员巨蟹也开始呼吁！当时就提出这个要求，现在还是这个要求！在目前的情况下，这是最不坏的方式。

Our views are slowly becoming more consistent in practice. From the beginning of the reform, I have always suggested that without the chain acceptance function, there is no objective judgment on whether the supply of bitCNY is sufficient or not. Based on this, the strength of the negative feedback should not be too large. In addition, the establishment of the chain acceptance function helps the commercialization and promotion of bitCNY. Now I think the most important thing is to discuss the feasibility of accepting on the chain. By the way, we can also "pull it."

还是改革时的那个意见，在没有建立起内盘承兑及内盘承兑深度的情况下，大幅的调整负喂价反馈，今天的情况在意料之中。因为根本没办法客观的反应bitCNY是否充足。

最近有朋友用一个小号练习多签，把这个小号的多签阀值设为10，加入一账号将权重设置为5，同时把这个小号的公钥权重改为6，保存修改之后在做任何操作都提示广播失败。那么这账号是不是就废了。