I have the latest client installed, synced and running stable for a couple of days.  Now, I ask for your support with votes.

wallet_approve_delegate fox
blockchain_get_account fox
Name: fox
Registered: Genesis (Keyhotee Founder)
Last Updated: 9 hours ago
Owner Key: DVS7Tb498vc8hCUqa8FnEhaztPPbUWysDsETZZjuAcLNs7Rch6MWc
Active Key History:
- DVS7Tb498vc8hCUqa8FnEhaztPPbUWysDsETZZjuAcLNs7Rch6MWc, last used 26 days ago

ID    NAME (* next in line)           APPROVAL       PRODUCED MISSED   RELIABILITY   PAY RATE PAY BALANCE         LAST BLOCK  VERSION
==========================================================================================================================================
169   fox                             0.00058710 %   0        0        N/A           100 %    0.00000 DVS         NONE        0.6.2

Block Signing Key: DVS7Tb498vc8hCUqa8FnEhaztPPbUWysDsETZZjuAcLNs7Rch6MWc
Public Data:
{
  "version": "0.6.2"
}

The client is ready to produce when enough votes are achieved:
getinfo
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 216581,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "100.00 %",
  "client_version": "0.6.2",
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_scan_progress": "100.00 %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}

Looking forward to contributing thru testing.

At what point do community members feel the initial delegates (init1...init101) have fulfilled their launch goal of network stability and can safely be removed from their role, thereby turning the network over to a more decentralized slate of delegates?

I make the assumption that DACs Unlimited controls these initial delegates. I feel the time has come for DACs Unlimited to remove their stake in these initial delegates. 

Thank you for your consideration
wallet_approve_delegate fox